jfsully
New member
- Jan 7, 2007
- 99
- 0
I've seen this term used (or maybe misused) many times on this forum and others.
The rule, if applied as in economics, means that for each successive coat of wax there WILL be an increase in utility and/or looks. That incremental increase will become less with each coat of wax BUT there is still an improvement.
Is it worth the effort? that may be a valid question and all of us involved in this hobby (or profession) make that decision when we become addicted to detailing. The difference between a dirty car and a clean one is massive, the difference between a clean car and an LSP'd car is a little less, the difference between a LSP'd car that has been polisihed is a little less...... and so on.
Is this the way the term is being used or do people mean that for each additional coat of wax (after a specific point) there is a detrimental effect to the look and/or protection?
The rule, if applied as in economics, means that for each successive coat of wax there WILL be an increase in utility and/or looks. That incremental increase will become less with each coat of wax BUT there is still an improvement.
Is it worth the effort? that may be a valid question and all of us involved in this hobby (or profession) make that decision when we become addicted to detailing. The difference between a dirty car and a clean one is massive, the difference between a clean car and an LSP'd car is a little less, the difference between a LSP'd car that has been polisihed is a little less...... and so on.
Is this the way the term is being used or do people mean that for each additional coat of wax (after a specific point) there is a detrimental effect to the look and/or protection?