MoBenzOwner
New member
- Sep 13, 2007
- 356
- 0
I am aware that when using IronX and clay in tandem, the generally accepted practice is to ironx first then clay. This is to make the claying go easier as I am sure it does.
However, my logic (for what it's worth) tells me to clay first then IronX. The reason being is that claying should shear off the above surface particles, which would leave only embedded below surface particles for the Ironx to clear up. We all know that if IronX does not remove all of the particle, claying obviously will not remove the below surface portion. In short, is IronX capable of removing the larger metal particles that extend both above and below the paint surface? If the answer is no, wouldn't it make more sense to clay before IronX instead of after??
However, my logic (for what it's worth) tells me to clay first then IronX. The reason being is that claying should shear off the above surface particles, which would leave only embedded below surface particles for the Ironx to clear up. We all know that if IronX does not remove all of the particle, claying obviously will not remove the below surface portion. In short, is IronX capable of removing the larger metal particles that extend both above and below the paint surface? If the answer is no, wouldn't it make more sense to clay before IronX instead of after??