Controlled section in the middle [bare paint on the thin center strip] Compared to a much lighter form of protection, in this case Megs D156 Synthetic Spray Sealant.
It’s like night & day. No doubt which side has more solid protection.
Now check this out.. I took this pic on May 13th [as you can see on the timestamp] just 3 days after starting this experiment. Look at the difference in the condensation.
Here’s a pic of the trunk.
That weak thin layer of condensation after just 3 days was the 1st red flag. So I grabbed the hose and was curious about the water behavior..
After hitting it with the shower setting on the nozzle. Keep in mind this is only 3 days into the test.
I knew at that moment something was off. That’s just not how it outta be..
1st of all that’s way too much water to still be on the panel after a fierce shower from the nozzle. 2nd those beads aren’t what they should be, IMO they’re already at the point of nearly going limp and just flat out wierd looking.. Bottom line that’s way too much water sticking to the paint.
Here’s an example of what I’m used to seeing, and this is like almost 2 months in on a normL stand alone application of sealant with no toppers ever applied to the paint. The water beads good, but more importantly if there’s even a little bit of force behind it [i.e. the hose nozzle] it runs away from the paint and does it’s best to be gone aka water fearing. This panel would be nearly dry if the application wasn’t 2 months old, but even then it sheets a whole lot better than this current experiment at only 3 days into it.
Now lets fast fwrd. to June 3rd. This is just 25 days into the test, no rain, the car hadn’t even moved the whole time.. Just sitting outside parked 24/7. It’s kind of dirty/dusty so here’s the day I did a pre rinse prior to waterless that I described in my previous post.
Rinse.
Now check out the water behavior/beading and lack of sheeting. IMO those beads a total mess and are to the point of asking for trouble the way they’re just sitting on the paint. [they actually did in fact turn into water spots that are kind of visible at the moment]
Also, notice the top section, which is McKee’s 360 AIO serving as the base layer has officially failed.
And on the trunk... Even more dramatic failure on the Griots panel, just 25 days in. [Griots Boss Finishing Sealant serving as the base on top. Megs D151 PRC serving as the base on the lower half of the panel]
I still want to run this test again just in case for some strange reason this is a fluke. [I highly doubt it as I was clinical in my application of all this]
But so far all signs point to the AIO’s causing extreme detriment when used as a “polish” or base layer under a sealant that typically provides very strong and long lasting protection, easily going 5-6 months on its own.
This is what the beading Should look like. Not that mess you see in those test panels.
...Interesting results. I’m going to try this same test on a different vehicle soon.