Mike Phillips
Active member
- Dec 5, 2022
- 51,004
- 7
- Thread starter
- #21
Mike these pads are interesting. I've read about them but have never used them. I do see a reason for having some on hand. My questions are somewhat subjective.
1. Say for the truck hood you did, how many pads would be required to complete just the hood?
The most difficult thing to do with these pads is clean them really good in-between buffing sections. The face of the pad becomes hard and almost glazed looking with use.
Brushing them with a stiff nylon brush helps but you never get the pad back to where it looked when it was new and that's what most people think they are going to do and what to do when cleaning a pad.
As long as you get any excess product off the face of the pad that appears to be good enough. The edges of the pads seem to want to curl inward, not sure if this is a huge deal or not. I can take a picture to show what I mean.
2. How long will a denim pad last relative to say a foam backed finishing disc?
That's one of those apples to oranges questions as these denim pads are very different from a microfiber pad.
The denim pad is just like your jeans and after being attached to the backing the surface is hard and non-giving. The microfiber pads are soft to the touch and have some level of cushion to them.
Also, these denim pads are for removing orange peel while the microfiber pads are for removing below surface defects or polishing and waxing.
I'm guessing a Flex 3401 might be an ideal tool being direct drive and that it oscillates.
A couple of comments...
1. Thin, hard pads don't buff really well on forced, rotation, gear-driven oscillating tools.
For example, the Meguiar's microfiber pads and the Lake Country "THIN" microfiber pads don't buff well on the Flex 3401.
Thicker pads do buff well on the Flex 3401, for example the thick Lake Country microfiber pads buff really well on the Flex 3401.
Instead of asking people to take my word for it I purposefully had two other experienced detailers test out both thin and thick microfiber pads on the Flex 3401 and then post their experience, you can read Robert's and Paul's thoughts on the thick versus thin MF Pads in posts #26 and #33 here,
2012 Dodge Challenger + Menzerna Color Lock Makeover
2. Currently the Denim pads by CarPro are only available in the 5 1/4" size. The factory backing plate on the Flex 3401 is just under 5 1/2". I just fitted one of these pads to the factory backing plate and it's undersized.
But again, I'm pretty sure if you tried these types of pads on a Flex 3401 the feeling you will get is what we call...
G-r-a-b-b-y
Because tools like the PC are free spinning, that is for lack of a better term they offer slippage which keeps the pad buffing smooth on the surface.
I like the safety factor over wet sanding but would look for something quicker than 8-12 passes.
Time is the trade-off for safety but you are cutting out the compounding step and keep in mind, compounding can bring with it heat issues as well as burn-through issues not to mention the time and mess associated with the compounding step, even little things like spurring a wool pad often when compounding out sanding marks.
As for the time issue, again I don't think anyone has dialed-in the perfect compound for this procedure yet. A lot of compounds tried, talked about but no definitive "Compound K is the best" type of conclusion yet.
I see this as a way of spot correcting quickly vs sanding and then polishing out the sanding marks. Could be a nice upsell or a way to deliver that something extra for a client.
It's an option that will reduce orange peel, maybe not remove it 100% depending upon the time factor.
It's definitely a new technology, new idea that will get more attention into the future and if things go like they normally go on forums like this one, the procedure will get perfected and then shared and then we'll all know.
That's why I say,
"Detailers that hang out on forums like this one know more than detailers that don't hang out on forums at all"
