Search results

Ok so you'd be able to remove 1000 grit with fg400 using your kind of pads? Everyone suggests to use wool or really cutting pads to cut that kind of grit. If you tell me I can remove it with those pads you mentioned I'm buying those. Because working with wool is really much dangerous...

I'm talking about very cutting pads. The spider pad can cut like a wool pad. You only mentioned medium-heavy pads that they are not comparable to the spider pad in terms of cutting power I would use the s2 with a cutting pad to remove p1500 grit marks (that is 800 grit in USA cami designation)...

Hey everybody. Two questions about this really good pad. 1.scholl states this is a pad for orbital machines. Did anyone try this pad with rotary and can say it works as well? Low temperature and high cut as well? 2.equivalent pads and comparisons: chemical guys hex, wavy pads, cutting...

could you tell me which is the best AIO for you? someone said the s3 xxl and someone the 3d adapt. What about fg400? It's not considered an AIO but can we compare it to these products?

Aren't all the products you mentioned above similar to menzerna fg400 or meguiars 105? But I heard someone saying its necessary to use 3d cut before 3d adapt. Is that wrong? Anyways... In that forum you posted here there's a guy who states the Norton 03b can remove 500 grit and leave a good...

Man the product your talking about is like a medium compound. It needs a cutting compound before because it can't remove sandpaper scratches... If you read in the site they state this liquid ice can remove sandpaper scratches and as you use softer pads you can get a finish without scratches

Guys its an automotive product. I saw it in this video-> http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zgZRo_u9HUA You can see it in the firsts minutes

Hello everyone. What do experts of this forum think about multipurpose polish like Norton's liquid ice? The guy in the video says it breaks with temperature so it depends on the type of pad you use. That's a water-based polish. Liquid Ice® What do you think?

Ok sorry

So can we say that 3in1 removes the haze left by the fg400 better than the new super finish 3500(that is the old sf4000 but with less cut)?

It seems the sf4000 changed his cutting power too. Older datasheets showed a cutting power of 3 while now as super finish 3500 is 2/10..... That's why I'm considering to use the 3in1 instead of the sf4000

Great Mike! Thanks for your comment. So my reasonament wasn't wrong... There is always the possibility to leave a small amount of swirls and scratches even with great products like the fg400. With the 3in1 we sacrifice a little the really small swirls but we're 100% sure we correct all the...

Ok the scheme is wrong then

Looks terrific to me... Is there any glaze on the 3in1?

The topic is not about the durability because everyone knows the durability is not even comparable to sealants

This scheme says they have the same cut

Sorry that message was wrong Read it above Anyway like you all I have the fg400 and the sf4000 plus I have the pf2500 I'm considering to buy the 3in1. It depends on what you will suggest me :-) PS. I could try the pf2500 with the fg400 to try to notice how many medium scratches it removes but...

Seems really few detailers here have tried the 3in1... Ok it's a relatively new product but we can't say fg400+sf4000 is the best without comparing it! I haven't tried it too but and that's why I'm asking... So examples and photos would be appreciated

Menzerna states 3in1 too has the power of removing holograms... So talking about shc300 I'd use the 3in1 after that... Because from what I can see in the scheme even these two overlap each other... Wouldn't it be a good combo? Shc300+3in1

You are the only one who said it isn't actually a stupid idea. I'd like you to explain which are the cases where you can see better results PS. Pictures would be great if you can