Search results

Four sectional passes using an orange flat LC pad with Meg UC. Koz

Thanks Mike! Koz

Counter

I only have an after picture. This is going to sound silly but, I used an flat orange LC pad with meg UC and made 4 sectional passes. Koz

That's right I used my Flex 3401 on a solid surface type (Corian) counter top with meg UC and they look amazing. lol Koz

You would have to get new pads but it would work. Koz

You can use the 3M 4" Edge pads with the adapter. I know that doesn't help with the Megs. I thought I read someone had cut a BP down to fit a 4" pad. Koz

This was their reply. "Yes it is 9600 rpm but has to be seen as two strokes 4800 forth and 4800 back." Koz

I would go even further on this point. I think the fact that the rotation being forced in the opposite direction of the orbital rotation is the key to its effectiveness. Think about it, you have two opposite cutting forces happening at the same time. Sort of like cross-cutting a lawn, in one...

The factory spec for the 3401 is "Orbital Rate - 3200-9600 RPM" not stroke rate (From their website). Side by side comparisons show that the 3401 corrects faster then the PC. Some people claim the PC and/or other ROs have more OPM and more power (Looking at output power, not input power)...

Nothing works better then this for removing adhesive! Link removed per forum rules. -Admin Koz

I wouldn't be surprised if this product was good for many other auto detailing issues. I have a friend in the vinyl lettering/sign business who introduced me to this product. He told me it was the only product that would take off old vinyl lettering on automotive paint, with very little effort...

To remove old vinyl, this is the best and safest product to use. Not only for vinyl but many other uses (Read the reviews). I bought a dozen bottles because whenever something works so well it ends up being taken off the market. I've tried every adhesive remover there is, even some industrial...

You both were using the same pad type/size and product? A smaller pad can be used on the Flex (4" 3M Edge). The Flex's opm is faster then the GG (The Flex and GG's opms are both direct drive), its the force rotation that is different (Gear driven). There is more to performance then power...

There is only one way to determine if the forced rotation is worth diverting power and extra money. You are in the position to make that determination. You and your partner could do a side-by-side comparison on the same vehicle with the same pads/products. This would be VERY interesting! Koz

The 850w cited for the GG is input power. The input power of the Flex is 900w. How the power is distributed does not change the total power of the machine. It will affect the performance. I'm sure flex determined that 900w was enough power to also drive the forced rotation feature. On paper, the...

I'd like to first say that in no way do I think that your personal opinion on the GG is wrong, everyone has an opinion that is based on their personal experience and (To me) this is the most important opinion a person can have. I do however feel that there is a mistake on the post that you...

I'm not sure why you feel there is any kind of combative nature to my post. First off, I'm a noob here and to the detailing world so you may have posted hundreds of times about many different subjects that a noob has never read. I am however a motorhead and car fanatic. I also am a member of...

You claim the GG is more powerful. Could you explain how you came to that conclusion? Here are the specs for both machines. Flex - 900w motor @ 9600rpm w/.31 stroke GG - 850w motor @ 6800rpm w/.31 stroke Koz

I would like to try the new products