Cliffs Notes: Brand new car, front and rear bumper have less metallic flake than rest of car - repaint? or other factor?
Full story:
So I just got a brand new 2016 STI in WRB pearl. I ordered this car and waited 2 months, car arrived on a Friday at the dealer and I picked it up Monday morning 2/8 with 5 miles on it.
I didn't let the dealer do any prep other than remove some of the plastic so I could avoid the dealer installed swirl option. So the car was obviously a bit dirty when I picked it up, as to be expected after transport. I've since noticed about about 6 or 7 minor defects on the paint that I know I'll be able to remove, no big deal I pretty much expected some due to being handled by various people.
The weather here has not been great, so day of pick up I did a wash and quick wax with collinite 845, with the intention of doing a full detail at some point in the near future. It was a bit nicer this weekend so I was able to do a wash followed by a topping with Souveran. I had previously noticed what appeared to be a difference in the amount of metallic flake in the paint on the front bumper. Since we actually had some sun, I was able to really fully inspect the car and it appears that the front and rear bumper share the same difference in flake from the rest of the car.
Now, the reason for this post is I want to get everyone's opinion here as to why there's a difference. I know that cars can be repaired in port due to damage during transport, so I don't know if the bumpers have been repainted, or if it's a case of the front and rear bumper being painted separately from the rest of the car at the factory, or if it's just a case of the paint laying differently on the plastic of the bumper as opposed to the metal panels on the rest of the car (though the rockers and wing are plastic and look no different)? Subarus aren't known for excellent paint quality, I know this, but didn't expect what seems to be a mis-match on a brand new car.
Thoughts?
Front bumper / fender:







Quarter panel to rear bumper:









Full story:
So I just got a brand new 2016 STI in WRB pearl. I ordered this car and waited 2 months, car arrived on a Friday at the dealer and I picked it up Monday morning 2/8 with 5 miles on it.
I didn't let the dealer do any prep other than remove some of the plastic so I could avoid the dealer installed swirl option. So the car was obviously a bit dirty when I picked it up, as to be expected after transport. I've since noticed about about 6 or 7 minor defects on the paint that I know I'll be able to remove, no big deal I pretty much expected some due to being handled by various people.
The weather here has not been great, so day of pick up I did a wash and quick wax with collinite 845, with the intention of doing a full detail at some point in the near future. It was a bit nicer this weekend so I was able to do a wash followed by a topping with Souveran. I had previously noticed what appeared to be a difference in the amount of metallic flake in the paint on the front bumper. Since we actually had some sun, I was able to really fully inspect the car and it appears that the front and rear bumper share the same difference in flake from the rest of the car.
Now, the reason for this post is I want to get everyone's opinion here as to why there's a difference. I know that cars can be repaired in port due to damage during transport, so I don't know if the bumpers have been repainted, or if it's a case of the front and rear bumper being painted separately from the rest of the car at the factory, or if it's just a case of the paint laying differently on the plastic of the bumper as opposed to the metal panels on the rest of the car (though the rockers and wing are plastic and look no different)? Subarus aren't known for excellent paint quality, I know this, but didn't expect what seems to be a mis-match on a brand new car.
Thoughts?
Front bumper / fender:







Quarter panel to rear bumper:








