Customer says I caused holograms in coating? - Wants to sue me!

Joined
Dec 5, 2022
Messages
51,004
Reaction score
6
Customer says I caused holograms in coating? - Wants to sue me!


Anytime I get questions via e-mail, a PM or a FB message I prefer to invest my typing time where

A: It's easier for me to share links, pictures and videos.

B: More people can read and thus benefit from the information. (no just one set of eyeballs)


The reality is, most people that contact me found me via an article I've written or a reply I've written on this forum. The thing is, instead of figuring out that the whole reason they are contacting me is because they found me via an article or answer I wrote on the forum that they to should bring their question to the forum because not only will that help them.... but it will help a future "them". If I answer everything in a private e-mail or other touch point, no one would find and contact me. It's a cycle or pattern that repeats as long as everything is shared in the public domain.

The above is kind of wordy but re-read it slowly and it will make sense.


So I get an e-mail asking,




Hi Mike big fan.

I have a problem I wanna get your in put on....

I ceramic coated a Gentlemans ocean blue Silverado back in September. he called me a few weeks ago saying he has holograms in his ceramic coating. I asked him to bring it to my shop so I can see it and indeed there are holograms in the entire ceramic coat. I asked him what he was using to dry the ceramic coat and he said a shammy and pulled it out of his truck, and it’s one of those ones that you can buy at Walmart. I explained to him that I told him from the begging not to use a shammy I also gave him a pamphlet from the C quartz UK3.0 that states how to properly maintain the ceramic coating.

I told him the only thing I can think of is the shammy is what put the holograms in it.because I know he didn’t take a rotary buffer to the ceramic coat but I also don’t know if he had another detailer touch it ( I havnt touched the truck since giving it back after the ceramic coating and it didn’t have holograms cause he didn’t want the paint correction just the ceramic coating)but none the less he wants to blame me saying I didn’t install the c quartz 3.0 and is threatening to sue me if I don’t refund his money but I don’t believe with everything that I’ve learn that I’am at fault. I believe your written expert opinion will help me in this matter.

Please and thank you




Wow!

Sorry to hear of your dilemma. I'm not sure how much I can help?


First - words mean things. Let's start with the word hologram or holograms. From my article below,



The word holograms means a specific scratch pattern inflicted into paint using a rotary buffer


The discussion about holograms comes up all the time in the car detailing world. The word holograms means,

a specific scratch pattern inflicted into paint using a rotary buffer

The pattern of swirls you see are actually scratches and the pattern you see in the paint mimic the direction a rotary buffer was moved over the surface.

Holograms from the use of a rotary polisher

watermark.php







So a shammy cannot inflict holograms into car paint or a coated car - ONLY a rotary buffer can put holograms into a car's paint, or coated paint.

A shammy can cause swirls and marring, but not holograms.


You say he did not want to pay for paint correction so you didn't do any paint correction you only applied the coating? At least that's what I think I'm reading from what you wrote. Then it could be you coated over someone else's hack work. That is, the truck could have had holograms in the paint BEFORE you worked on it and because you didn't do any paint correction, (a polishing step), you merely coated over the holograms and now he's blaming you.

The only other option I can see here is if this customer took it to someone else to detail AFTER you coated it and the other person used a rotary buffer to put holograms into the coated paint.


Here's the deal - I have my own rules for coatings cars and that is if I'm going to apply a ceramic paint coating or any LSP - I'm going to do at least one machine polishing step and thereby avoid this problem.


I don't have an easy answer for you but the easy way out and avoid a lawsuit would be to simply re-do the truck. ONLY use and orbital polisher. Do NOT use a rotary buffer. Machine polish the entire truck to remove the holograms and then chemically strip the paint and re-apply the coating.

The above is not the fast and easy way out but it is the way to save your reputation and satisfy the owner. Then share this thread with him and I'll back you up in that coatings are NOT invisible force fields and "YES" even a coated vehicle must be washed carefully and dried carefully.

In the future - if you're not already - get a copy of my Vehicle Inspection Form and be sure to inspect the paint on any car you detail before you touch it and document all pre-existing damage.

Holograms in the paint ARE pre-existing damage.

And one more thing - in my detailing classes, both the big 3-day class here and my roadshow classes - I teach guys how to avoid this problem in the first place. Plus I teach a TONS of other stuff. Read some of the reviews I get from people that attend my classes and if I'm in your neck of the woods - take the class. It won't cost you money - it will MAKE and save you money.






Hope that helps and feel encouraged to join our forum, this is where I answer questions. Email and Facebook messaging are okay, but the forum is a LOT more powerful. (think about it - it's how you found me in the first place)


Click here to join the AutogeekOnline.net car detailing discussion forum - THE best forum on the Internet


As you can see - I don't answer question via FB messaging...


:)
 
Mike pretty much covered it. But I'll add this. It's been almost 5 months and he just now is coming back with a complaint. If it was something that noticable and you caused it he would have/should have noticed it from the get go.

He doesn't have a leg to stand on.
 
I’m curious if there are any attorneys on the forum who could chime in with their take on this situation.
 
Mike pretty much covered it. But I'll add this. It's been almost 5 months and he just now is coming back with a complaint. If it was something that noticable and you caused it he would have/should have noticed it from the get go.

He doesn't have a leg to stand on.

I agree. If the holograms are that visible the op would have seen them when applying the coating, or when doing a final wipe down before delivery.

Sounds like someone for whatever reason, hit it with a rotary.
 
I wonder what prep he did before the CQUK 3.0 if he did not polish it. This is just a thought and a big if. What if there where some kind masking LSP product on the paint before he got it to installing the coating. And the prep didn't desolved that and made the coating fail to soon. So know he see the holograms that was masked and have been on the paint from the beginning. As Mike also mentioned but maybe a reason the detailer did not see the holograms before.

My bet is the customer either himself or another detailer has done the holograms. In a way to attempt to correct the marring swirls from inproper wash and or drying technique and products used. Or the holograms he sees is not holograms but wash indused marring or dry indused marring. That he thinks is holograms but not is it. Hard to say without pictures.

It's hard this as a business owner if you are going to make it right even if you have not done any fault. But sometimes it could be needed to do it. And many customers are well aware of this and takeing advantage of this situations. To avoid it as much as possible as a detailer in the future Mikes advise on the inspection of the vehical before the work and the customer signs it. And when talking with some customer before takeing the work and you notice that they have unreal expectations and other red flags. It's learning to say no to those job. And that's not easy either to do and not always to easy to detect those PITA customers.
 
Wow sorry to see this happen to you. I agree with Mike, re-do the entire vehicle. MAKE HIM SIGN the Vehicle Inspection Report BEFORE & AFTER completion. Once he is satisfied....NEVER HAVE HIM AS A CUSTOMER AGAIN. My GUESS 6 months from now he may come after you for the same thing! I hope you see the pattern I am trying to make....a repeat offender.
 
That’s why it’s helpful to get some input from a lawyer too.
 
Wow sorry to see this happen to you. I agree with Mike, re-do the entire vehicle. MAKE HIM SIGN the Vehicle Inspection Report BEFORE & AFTER completion. Once he is satisfied....NEVER HAVE HIM AS A CUSTOMER AGAIN. My GUESS 6 months from now he may come after you for the same thing! I hope you see the pattern I am trying to make....a repeat offender.

I forgot to add. When you are finished with the re-do, TAKE PLENTY OF PICTURES. I would take BEFORE and AFTER PICTURES. Date them and include them in the VIR. That way he can't come back at you 6 months from now saying you screwed the ride up again. Just my thought! Cover your Behind!
 
Wouldn't using a rotary remove the coating anyway, so it's not holograms on the coating but the coating has been removed and is now showing the holograms? I'm not seeing how using a rotary would leave behind holograms on the coating and still have the coating intact.
 
Wouldn't using a rotary remove the coating anyway, so it's not holograms on the coating but the coating has been removed and is now showing the holograms? I'm not seeing how using a rotary would leave behind holograms on the coating and still have the coating intact.
Maybe the coating is not intact. Too many unanswered questions.
 
Maybe the coating is not intact. Too many unanswered questions.

That's what I'm saying, referring to what Mike posted about a rotary leaving behind holograms on the coating, I don't see how that's possible. That would have to be one seriously tough coating to still be there.
 
Mike nailed it in his answer. There really isn't much I or anyone can add. Mike's answer is 100% spot on. From a legal view, a point was made that this was discovered after 5 months? With that said, I think Small Claims court is what?? Damages over $1000.00? First off, no judge wants to hear it, so they'll ask if it can get sent to arbitration. If both parties have to hire lawyers ($$$), file papers and suit in court ($$$) show up and argue ($$$) It's going to cost more to file a suit than just settle it.

Damages is described as any "monetary value."
it's not really "damages" because about 3 hours with a DA and some polish will remove all the scratches, so it's not like you ruined the paint. A judge will not know anything about this, so once explained that it's just superficial scratches in a semi-permanent coating (that is going to wear out in 18 months anyway), and can be rectified easily in a few hours, the judge will send both of you on his/her way wondering why precious time was wasted in his/her court room.


As Mike states, a coating has to go down on mechanically, chemically decontaminate, defect free paint. The ONLY way I know how to do that is:
- Wash
- Iron-X
- Wash
- Clay
- Inspect Paint
- Compound or Polish to the degree of paint correction required
- IPA (or what I use... Erasure) wipe-down
- Tape off glass (so you don't get over-spread of coating and high-spots)
- Apply Coating with two towel method, inspect as you wipe and reinspect to avoid high-spots (CQUK 3.0) has taken a lot of this risk out over prev versions
- One more inspection
- Deliver vehicle

Do a VIF to provide an accurate quote, take good pictures during the VIF, good before pictures when car is dropped off, and good after pictures.
Cutting corners now, leaves doors wide open in the future... Even if the person in question didn't cause the holograms, there are no preparation steps performed to say he didn't.
Again, if no correction was done, the amount paid couldn't have been too much... At least under $1000.00 ---> either refund or redo, send the guy on his way.

People who throw the term "I'm going to sue" really have no concept of what that means, and the time & costs involved. If they did it, they wouldn't say it...
 
I wouldn't worry about it. That would be a hard case to prove if the customer waited 5 months down the road. People today are just sue happy. I have a lawyer on retainer at all times to tell the customer to go *bleep themselves*. If you sue me you better have a loan already approved to a hire a top of the line lawyer cause I'm gonna bury you in legal fees etc.


Besides that doesn't look that bad I can fix that in 4 hours.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Autogeekonline mobile app
 
If the vehicle was satisfactory when he left that's it, period! A shop can't be held responsible for what happens next, once it leaves it's on them. What if he decided to do the 52 carwashes in a row test like Nu Finish, just an example. The problem here is the internet and review sites, how does someone protect themselves from a leach like this, I feel sorry for you guys dealing with the public (see our thread about the public posted recently)

Hope this all works out!

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Not a week, not a month, not 5 weeks, but FIVE months.

Here in NY, we have a saying for that.

It would involve contorting your body........ :laughing:
 
Not a week, not a month, not 5 weeks, but FIVE months.

Here in NY, we have a saying for that.

It would involve contorting your body........ :laughing:
I heard Eric Cartman say that before too, the F word was bleeped, LOL!

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
I also apply coatings without any paint correction if that is what the client wants. I don't feel it's up to me to decide what is good or not for the client. I explain in great details what I recommend he does, but in the end if he doesn't want paint correction or polishing, that's his right.

I assume you take before and after pictures. So you should have visual proof of either : a) pre-existing damage in the paint in the form of hollograms or swirl marks b) post-coating condition of the car. So if your pre-existing pictures show swirls, you have proof they are not the result of your work. If your post coating pictures show no such damage, again it is proof that is not the result of your work.

So now you know if the problem was you or not. If it was, I would simply re-do the work and correct the problem for the client as Mike suggests.

If the problem is not your fault, I would offer to do the same but charge the client for the work. Once the car leaves your garage, you are not responsible for what the client does. And you should not have to pay for his mistakes. If he wants to sue you, show him the pictures. If he still sues, you will win because you have proof.

Also, as suggested, a vehicle inspection sheet is a good idea, I use one on every detail I do.

An other thing I do is put details on the invoice about what was done. In the case of a coating, if the client goes for a coating without correction I put the following as the main item: Basic paint coating package without any paint correction or polishing. So if I get sued, I can explain to the judge that I have suggested to the client to polish the paint prior to coating but he decided not to pay for the extra service.
 
I wouldn't worry about it. That would be a hard case to prove if the customer waited 5 months down the road. People today are just sue happy. I have a lawyer on retainer at all times to tell the customer to go *bleep themselves*. If you sue me you better have a loan already approved to a hire a top of the line lawyer cause I'm gonna bury you in legal fees etc.


Besides that doesn't look that bad I can fix that in 4 hours.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Autogeekonline mobile app

He didn't post any pictures, he's not a forum member yet. Mike P posted that photo to show an example of what holograms are.
 
Sounds like you customer owns a rotary and some pads and tried to do the paint correction himself to save money and you must have missed the hologram ms when you coated
 
Back
Top