Ebola in Texas!?

HD.Detailing

New member
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
928
Reaction score
0
Saw this on the news this morning:

Officials with Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital in Dallas released the following statement Monday night:

“Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas has admitted a patient into strict isolation to be evaluated for potential Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) based on the patient’s symptoms and recent travel history. The hospital is following all Centers for Disease Control and Texas Department of Heath recommendations to ensure the safety of patients, hospital staff, volunteers, physicians and visitors. The CDC anticipates preliminary results tomorrow.”

The patient’s travel history and specific symptoms remain unclear, but it is said to involve a high fever and vomiting. The name of the patient has not been released.

CBS 11 News spoke with Dallas County Health and Human Services director Zachary Thompson, who confirmed that the patient had been in an area where the Ebola virus exists. “Looking at the travel history is the first indicator, and then the next step is [treatment or non-treatment] once we get lab results,” he said.
Thompson definitely felt that there should be a heightened sense of awareness in North Texas, based on what has happened internationally. “With what we’ve seen in the media and how deadly the Ebola virus is, it is a concern,” he said.

Thompson stressed that there are certain procedures that will be followed if tests for the patient come back positive. “We [health professionals] all had been planning to look at what our next steps are if there is a confirmed case,” Thompson said. “Again, we have to do the public health follow up to see what contacts, where this individual has gone since they arrived here in Dallas. There are a number of things that have to be looked at.”

As far as possible infection to others here in North Texas, Thompson said, “The key point is, if there’s been no transmission, blood, secretion, any type of bodily fluids by the infected person to someone else, then that risk is low to none.”
 
Doubtful anything to worry about. Transmission of Ebola is extremely difficult regardless of what the news wants you to believe.
 
Its confirmed. He has the Ebola virus.

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
 
This Ebola scare is so silly. Be more concerned about other diseases. :) Ebola is only a problem in under developed nations. Honestly you could shake the hand of someone in early stage of ebola and wash your hands after and not get it.

The media needs to hype something, it's been slow for the networks lately.

Also watch the movie Contagion if you want to be scared! Hahah

I much prefer a disease that made people zombies, I want too go all Rick Grimes on one.
 
Waiting for the first person to call out of work because they think they have Ebola.
 
I get the concern, but let's put things in perspective. More people die from the flu every month than have ever died from Ebola.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using AG Online
 
Same thing happened to a couple people in Georgia a couple months ago.
 
Same thing happened to a couple people in Georgia a couple months ago.

Actually they got it while in Africa, and were brought here for treatment. They were doctors and I believe aid workers. Different scenario than now, where this person came from Liberia to visit family, wasn't showing signs and only showed symptoms 4 days into his visit.

So in the first story yes they were Americans, but no were not here upon infection, they traveled back for treatment. This guy arrived this way, just albeit not knowing he had it.

Technically no one got sick here, they all got sick there. So it's really not "here" in the US, even though "technically" it is. And that's why this is all so silly, overhyping nothing to scare people.
 
I get the concern, but let's put things in perspective. More people die from the flu every month than have ever died from Ebola.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using AG Online

not quite accurate analysis.. most die from this disease that acquire it not the flu.
 
Actually they got it while in Africa, and were brought here for treatment. They were doctors and I believe aid workers. Different scenario than now, where this person came from Liberia to visit family, wasn't showing signs and only showed symptoms 4 days into his visit.

So in the first story yes they were Americans, but no were not here upon infection, they traveled back for treatment. This guy arrived this way, just albeit not knowing he had it.

Technically no one got sick here, they all got sick there. So it's really not "here" in the US, even though "technically" it is. And that's why this is all so silly, overhyping nothing to scare people.

never know who he had contact with on the plane, airport, hotel, restaurants, restrooms, etc.. since being back. It very well could be "here"

I think it is definitely something to be concerned about and hopefully the CDC will truly have a cure by December assuming this disease doesn't mutate.
 
I think it's important to remember the mortality rates we are seeing are MUCH lower when the patients receive proper, modern treatment. It's still a serious disease, but it's just not as deadly for a patient with access to first world level care.
 
never know who he had contact with on the plane, airport, hotel, restaurants, restrooms, etc.. since being back. It very well could be "here"

Well the CDC did "contact tracing" which basically is a web of whom the person was in contact with, so far everyone one the flight is ruled out. It's who he visited in the 4 days while showing symptoms who the CDC will isolate and examine. However, they've had no other issues or cases presented, even by his family who touched him, etc....so so far so good. But honestly, it is so hard to spread in more civilized countries like here where it is easier to trace, then say the Sierra Leone or Liberia. Where theres no records kept, no in and out records of travel, etc....its hard to trace who touched who, who got sicks where, literally people living on the streets in their own crap, its horrible, but close quarters, lack of healthcare at first diagnosis, all of that is why it is dangerous in underdeveloped areas. Not here, here once the CDC s notified, it casts its web, covers everyone who was in contact, determines risk, elevates those who need isolation, cuts them off and observes. Much easier to do here in the states, since its easier to determine who was wear, where they then went etc...

ehh, not trying to argue or anything, just like talking news!
 
not quite accurate analysis.. most die from this disease that acquire it not the flu.

Actually i was showing contrast between total deaths of the different contagions, not survival rate. It is a pretty good analysis actually! Ebola is not that big of a threat unless it goes airborne. Then there is a real issue.

Not to mention modern countries have advanced effective means to combat a contagion such as Ebola, like hot water and soap.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using AG Online
 
never know who he had contact with on the plane, airport, hotel, restaurants, restrooms, etc.. since being back. It very well could be "here"

I think it is definitely something to be concerned about and hopefully the CDC will truly have a cure by December assuming this disease doesn't mutate.

Any contact there would not be enough to transmit. Extended human contact is required for transmission. This is why underdeveloped countries have such a higher rate due to lack of medical care so family members take care of one another. This close contact over days is what leads to transmission. Not a simple sneeze on one another.
 
Not most...all. There is no cure for the Ebola Virus.
There's no cure for ANY virus--just supportive care. And even in third world countries people survive Ebola. With proper care, you are likely to survive.
 
Back
Top