mywifehatesclowns
New member
- Jun 10, 2007
- 74
- 0
Why is it that everyone points to using a Dual Action Machine First before using a rotary? What about a very long time ago when all there was to choose from was: Orbital and Rotary?
The cost of these things over time seem just kinda like a waste. That is my opinion though.
I come here from another forum and I like this atmosphere better as there seem to be less "know it alls" and more people understanding.
So here is my question.
What do you think of people who just learn to use a rotary from the beginning but have read literature on it and only use it at a slow pace and never above 1200 rpm and know not to let it sit in one spot for too long and know not to bring it to the edges. Someone who understands they have to keep it moving.
It just seems to me that you cannot achieve the same results with a Dual action as you can with a rotary.
The cost of these things over time seem just kinda like a waste. That is my opinion though.
I come here from another forum and I like this atmosphere better as there seem to be less "know it alls" and more people understanding.
So here is my question.
What do you think of people who just learn to use a rotary from the beginning but have read literature on it and only use it at a slow pace and never above 1200 rpm and know not to let it sit in one spot for too long and know not to bring it to the edges. Someone who understands they have to keep it moving.
It just seems to me that you cannot achieve the same results with a Dual action as you can with a rotary.