I'm glad to hear someone finally say this.
I Thought I was crazy. Test spots (initial contact with orange pads and the 3,4,5 dots of your liking, circle...... doesn't matter) seemed to cut great on the wife' s Jeep. Then after a panel, less so it seemed.
Yeah, I really, really dislike that foam. Gives up the ghost for cutting, requires very heavy pressure to have an effect on the paint, resists rotation more than other dense pads. The pore size / density / composition just doesn't work for me at all...
I do like the white for AIO, but prefer the B & S black, which is more aggressive than the LC.
I remember when I washed my pads after a job. I used the Orange LC, and green B & S. When I was running my thumbs over them to clean the out, the green was still very coarse feeling compared to the orange. I thought I was crazy too! I had my GF, and Mom do the same to get their opinion, and they both said the green was more rough.
Then I put them to test on the paint, and the green killed the Orange every time. I remember one job I came back from a break and tried the orange... Took that thing off immediately, and put the green one back on.
The green is sold as a polishing pad, but I believe that is because it was widely recommended to use a lot of downward pressure with the random orbitals emerging on to the scene. Back in the rotary days, the green was a "cutting" pad. Sometimes medium, and sometimes light. Adams had it positioned as their heaviest cut in their line, while the orange (Buff and Shine) was light cut...
The green requires way less downward pressure, runs cooler, spins well, "scrubs" the paint, and accommodates panel contours very well. To me, I no longer fight my instincts, and just buy what works best for me.
I still have and use the beautiful Hydrotech pads for my diminishing abrasive liquids, but for my SMAT Megs, I just need the green and blue Buff and Shine pads.