Ohio Detailing
New member
- Apr 28, 2008
- 913
- 0
What is the difference with Meg's hydrophobic polymer etc technology they advertise - and the other QD's on the market? What is their claim and does it pan out or give an advantage in any way?
Meg's new teck...
- Thread starter Ohio Detailing
- Start date
AjNavo61490
New member
- Oct 29, 2007
- 548
- 0
UQD provides a layer of polymer technology that makes the water bead up and give it a nice shine
ScottB
New member
- Mar 3, 2006
- 18,803
- 0
I think alot of the same technology is called different things in the name of marketing. (ie standing out)
What I will note is Megs was critisized on NXT and some other products for sheeting water versus beading, not that beading is an absolute indicator of protection, but complied with beading to make the end user happy.
What I will note is Megs was critisized on NXT and some other products for sheeting water versus beading, not that beading is an absolute indicator of protection, but complied with beading to make the end user happy.
SanAndreas
New member
- May 10, 2008
- 14
- 0
I find that their regular QD is pretty good comparable to Wolfgang and probably already has some sealant. I haven’t tried their Ultimate QD. It looks like a way to get a couple more $’s out of you. I guess it extends protection for people who use Meg’s wax once every 3 months or less. But why worry about protection if you already seal or wax often enough? I noticed they also make it in 22oz size vs. 16 and 32oz for QD so direct cost comparison is impossible.
I can’t believe these jerks trademarked ‘Hydrophobic Polymer Technology’. Give me a break.
I can’t believe these jerks trademarked ‘Hydrophobic Polymer Technology’. Give me a break.
Ohio Detailing
New member
- Apr 28, 2008
- 913
- 0
- Thread starter
- #5
HAHAHAHA!!!!
Wow - I guess marketing reigns king! Does everyone else agree that this 'technology' isn't truly a revolution at all?
Wow - I guess marketing reigns king! Does everyone else agree that this 'technology' isn't truly a revolution at all?
supercharged
New member
- Mar 7, 2006
- 7,305
- 0
it's a revolution compared to their first QD, which was a total junk...Optimum or DP QD mixes are much better and cheaper too...
SanAndreas
New member
- May 10, 2008
- 14
- 0
I’m wondering why you say it’s junk. To me a lot of QD’s are pretty much the same.
Ohio Detailing
New member
- Apr 28, 2008
- 913
- 0
- Thread starter
- #10
I just got a sample of Pinn Crystal Mist - can't wait to try it out! I'm really not looking for a lot or any of 'protection'... I was looking for the brightest/deepest gloss from a spray detailer - on a bright red paint job. Thoughts? Is there any detailer everyone can agree upon (or a majority, lol) that is just insane on dark colors consistently? AG's brands are amazing I'm sure, but it's hard for me to differentiate between their brands...
supercharged
New member
- Mar 7, 2006
- 7,305
- 0
That's because you haven't been spoiled by high quality QD+. Try some Pinnacle Crystal Mist, Wolfgang Spritz, DP, ClearKote Quickshine, and you will understand what I'm talking about...Meguiar's quick detailer offers same durability as plain water...In fact it's scented water with a scoop of alcohol in it...and they charge so much for it...Believe me, Optimum No Rinse or DP 4-in-1 will make you a better QD, cheaper too...
New Meguiar's Ultimate QD is quite nice though...finally some improvement from them.
Ohio Detailing
New member
- Apr 28, 2008
- 913
- 0
- Thread starter
- #12
Supercharged...
Because of your quote above with the Meg's QD, and my belief that this forum is very legit and educated - I am not going to purchase anymore from Meg's line (unless it's the Glaze professional line or maybe at some point their new QD you gave props to) but paying for packaging and overhead isn't my idea of quality... I had no idea it was just water and alcohol - BUT, it makes sense now that I think about it.
Because of your quote above with the Meg's QD, and my belief that this forum is very legit and educated - I am not going to purchase anymore from Meg's line (unless it's the Glaze professional line or maybe at some point their new QD you gave props to) but paying for packaging and overhead isn't my idea of quality... I had no idea it was just water and alcohol - BUT, it makes sense now that I think about it.
SanAndreas
New member
- May 10, 2008
- 14
- 0
I have Wolfgang Spritz right now. But I don’t think I’ve ever used it on anything but paint in good condition with a good coat of sealant already on it. Maybe there’s just not a noticeable difference if the paint is already pristine.
Spritz and Meg’s QD both leave the surface slicker. Maybe the thing to do is try half a hood with each after washing and see if either has much slickness after the next wash and any other differences. I’ll be the first to criticize Meguiar’s but there’s got to be more than water, alcohol and perfume in QD.
You are right about DP being cheaper.
Spritz and Meg’s QD both leave the surface slicker. Maybe the thing to do is try half a hood with each after washing and see if either has much slickness after the next wash and any other differences. I’ll be the first to criticize Meguiar’s but there’s got to be more than water, alcohol and perfume in QD.
You are right about DP being cheaper.
supercharged
New member
- Mar 7, 2006
- 7,305
- 0
Meguiar's was the first to introduce quick detailer, and I think this is their original formula, obviously not the best. I found Final Inspection to offer easier application (better slickness), or Last touch detailer cut with water 1:1. I do like the sprayer though, it creater really fine mist...:cheers:
I have used both. The regular or original QD, I only use for claying as lubricant. I do like the new Ultimate QD, as it does offer a little protection, and you will notice a difference in gloss enhancement. The UQD is not really suited for claying as it is slicker and does cost more than regular QD.
Andy
101impala
Andy
101impala
Ohio Detailing
New member
- Apr 28, 2008
- 913
- 0
- Thread starter
- #17
I was referring to the new NXT, or Ultimate QD Meg's offers.
I have used the regular red bottle QD for years, and love the super fine mist it gives.
As for claying, is there a reason why using something slicker isn't better, would that be so the clay can grab better? What is the difference in a spray that would be optimal for strictly claying, rather than a detail mist?
I have used the regular red bottle QD for years, and love the super fine mist it gives.
As for claying, is there a reason why using something slicker isn't better, would that be so the clay can grab better? What is the difference in a spray that would be optimal for strictly claying, rather than a detail mist?
Mike T
New member
- Mar 3, 2006
- 1,716
- 0
Correct. YOu want the clay to be able to grab at the surface. embedded contaminates can be difficult to remove, especially if there is to much lubrication involved.
Ohio Detailing
New member
- Apr 28, 2008
- 913
- 0
- Thread starter
- #19
Oh, OK Mike... never realized that - wow, thanks bro. Oh, and I haven't forgotten about your write-up, ugh - I hate making you wait, but I'm off to work again right now... soon my friend!
Ohio Detailing
New member
- Apr 28, 2008
- 913
- 0
- Thread starter
- #20
Has anyone ever tried Wizard's products, specifically their quick detail?
After all these years, I believe it is still superior to anything else I have ever tried. I have never gotten a single streak, and it leaves the surface super slick and clean. I found a bottle of Wizard's last week that I have literally had for six years, and I used it on my car after a good wash, and was STILL impressed; I can't believe the chemicals held up that long.
After all these years, I believe it is still superior to anything else I have ever tried. I have never gotten a single streak, and it leaves the surface super slick and clean. I found a bottle of Wizard's last week that I have literally had for six years, and I used it on my car after a good wash, and was STILL impressed; I can't believe the chemicals held up that long.