Review: Nanolex Reactivating Shampoo

EVOlved

New member
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
1,128
Reaction score
0
Today I will be reviewing Nanolex Reactivating Shampoo. I received this shampoo as a tester from Gil of Nanolex.us. I believe the sample is somewhere around a 4oz. bottle.

First impression:

20140825_182956.jpg


Shipped securely in a nice sample container which was then placed inside of a ziplock bag just to be sure. So open the spout and it smells like banana. Go to put it in the bucket and it is a very watery consistency much more so than the soaps I am used to at this point (mainly CG and Lusso auto bathe).

Use:

The vehicle I used for this test is my girlfriends 08 Acura TL in Royal Blue Pearl (a.k.a. The testbed). It was in a relatively dirty state:

20140825_145626.jpg


Didn't look too bad from far, but up close:

20140825_145514.jpg


20140825_145831.jpg


And then there was our favorite animal leaving it's presents behind:

20140825_145522.jpg


20140825_145506.jpg



I decided I would use the soap as part of my usual 3BW. According to what Gil said, we were supposed to use the whole bottle in one wash. I had already foamed the car with Honeydew Snow Foam, so I decided I would use around half the bottle just to be safe. It came out of the bottle extremely quickly because of the watery consistency, so I actually ended up with a little over half the bottle in the bucket. The smell was pleasant, even though I hate bananas. It foamed up quickly and had a nice amount of suds.

20140825_161520.jpg


So off to a great start, now onto putting the mitt to the paint. The suds didn't really transfer all that well from the bucket to the mitt then onto the paint. So it didn't really glide as well as my favorite Lusso soap, but it was along the lines of the CG just a little less smooth. So now rinsing the soap was easy and it did seem to either leave something behind or “reactivate” the Hydr02 that was on the car because of:


20140825_162521.jpg


20140825_162530.jpg



Then what was left in the bucket:

20140825_163004.jpg


Not a lot of suds, but suds none the less. So the car was now cleaned I proceeded to dry it and dress the tires and trim and here is the end result:


20140825_181237.jpg


20140825_181158.jpg


20140825_181210.jpg


20140825_181123.jpg


Conclusion:

I liked the soap. It cleaned well, smelled good, and foamed up well enough. That said would I purchase it? I don't think so. Reason being I prefer the glide, smell, and gentleness of Lusso Auto Bathe. The other reason would be the price, I thought Lusso would be the most expensive soap I would ever use at around $3.25 a wash at regular price, but according to Gil's dilution rate and the price of this soap at their site it boils down to $12.75 a wash :wow:. So it is a good soap but it may only be worth the price of admission if you have the LSP it is supposed to “reactivate” applied and even at that only once in a blue moon if you ask me.

Thanks for viewing.
 
Thorough review, thanks for your time and effort!

Quick question: What's your LSP that you used on that Acura?

Would be informative to know what this "Reactivative" product was working with.

Thanks
 
Thorough review, thanks for your time and effort!

Quick question: What's your LSP that you used on that Acura?

Would be informative to know what this "Reactivative" product was working with.

Thanks

So now rinsing the soap was easy and it did seem to either leave something behind or “reactivate” the Hydr02 that was on the car because of:

I did :). And thank you for the kind words.

In all honesty I'm guessing it's meant to "reactivate" the sealant that is listed on their site. I'm thinking but just speculating since I haven't used it yet that it has a somewhat similar makeup to CarPro Reset.
 
*facepalm* sorry I missed that!

I could see how an addition of an amount of the same ingredients in the wash that are in the sealant could provide some longevity. Again, thanks for the write-up
 
Back
Top