The Critic
New member
- Dec 16, 2009
- 673
- 0
Hey guys,
I have now owned my Rupes 21 for about two months.
Here are my thoughts on the product so far:
- The NVH is best-in-class, period.
- The 21mm throw provides a significant amount of cut and is an absolute champ with MF pads. However, be careful, as Meg did not design the MF pads to be used with a DA with this much power.
- The Rupes 7" pads are too big/thick for this polisher. As a result, the polisher stalls too easily on curved panels.
- IMO, the 21 works best with the 5" backing plate and standard 5.5" pads. The thinner the pad, the better. While the 5.5" pads do not completely eliminate the stalling issue, it is a significant improvement over the bulky 7" Rupes pads.
- This machine does finish a bit better than the Flex 3401. Light cutting pad + finishing polish can yield significant defect removal and still finish out great on soft paints.
- If you are only going to use the 5.5" pad, you may want to consider the Rupes 15. While the Rupes 15 has 30% less throw, it is a bit smoother on 5.5" pads and provides similar correction for a lot less money.
- It takes longer to break down certain polishes, at least compared to the Flex 3401. For instance, I have noticed that Sonax Perfect Finish takes noticeably longer to break down on the Rupes compared to the Flex.
While I definitely would not want the Rupes 21 as my only polisher, it definitely has a place in any detailer’s tool chest.
Please discuss and feel free to share your experience and/or offer your feedback.
Thanks!
I have now owned my Rupes 21 for about two months.
Here are my thoughts on the product so far:
- The NVH is best-in-class, period.
- The 21mm throw provides a significant amount of cut and is an absolute champ with MF pads. However, be careful, as Meg did not design the MF pads to be used with a DA with this much power.
- The Rupes 7" pads are too big/thick for this polisher. As a result, the polisher stalls too easily on curved panels.
- IMO, the 21 works best with the 5" backing plate and standard 5.5" pads. The thinner the pad, the better. While the 5.5" pads do not completely eliminate the stalling issue, it is a significant improvement over the bulky 7" Rupes pads.
- This machine does finish a bit better than the Flex 3401. Light cutting pad + finishing polish can yield significant defect removal and still finish out great on soft paints.
- If you are only going to use the 5.5" pad, you may want to consider the Rupes 15. While the Rupes 15 has 30% less throw, it is a bit smoother on 5.5" pads and provides similar correction for a lot less money.
- It takes longer to break down certain polishes, at least compared to the Flex 3401. For instance, I have noticed that Sonax Perfect Finish takes noticeably longer to break down on the Rupes compared to the Flex.
While I definitely would not want the Rupes 21 as my only polisher, it definitely has a place in any detailer’s tool chest.
Please discuss and feel free to share your experience and/or offer your feedback.
Thanks!