So what did we decide for my using Speed on my 2014 Torch Red Mustang? BS Uro-Fiber or Lake Country Orange?
I would do 2 test sections, one with each pad, and then get a real good look/see and decide which one looks better.
Paul is spot-on.... no pun intended.
Do a Test Spot and then examine the results. I you really want to see what's taking place at the surface level, chemically strip the paint where you did both test spots and then inspect with bright swirl finder light.
To be fair to both pads, you need to have controls in place,
- Same type of pad, that is cutting, polishing or finishing
- Same mount of product
- Same number of passes
- Same speed setting
- Same size area
- Same downward pressure or same lack of pressure etc.
Basically, use great technique as you should for the pad, tool and product.
A
Like Mike Phillips says - foam tends to finish nicer, and more consistently than a fiber pad.
Agree.
I think what I type is, when comparing foam to microfiber pads,
Foam pads will tend to finish out nicer more consistently on a wider spectrum of paint systems than fiber pads
And part of the reason for this is because fibers act as a form of abrasive. I've explained this using the
Meguiar's Microfiber DA Correction System as an analogy.
Meguiar's introduced this system to change the production detailing industry by getting rid of the universally abused rotary buffer. The production detailing industry uses the rotary buffer for SPEED, not quality.
The idea was to replace the rotary buffer with a free spinning orbital polisher, the G100 or the MT300. (same 8mm free spinning orbital polishing action)
To make up for the loss of direct drive power and speed offered by the rotary buffer the incorporated a microfiber pad or a
FIBER pad to assist in faster defect removal. The fibers act as a form of abrasive plus aid the actual abrasives in the compound and polish.
Car Detailing History 101
