Buff Master Mike P...
My first post mentioning you, so here's my first official CONTRATS on your new job at Autogeek. It is nice to see that Autogeek has an official AG Guru in
you!

rops:
Thanks for e-mailing me for some input on this. The information listed down the line pertains to the random orbital.
First off, the
KBM is not for everyone because most guys are more than satisfied with how a random orbital performs as used in its traditional manner. I am good with that! :xyxthumbs: Further, each buffing liquid features the manufacturers recommendations pertaining to the use of that particular product, and polishing enthusiasts should use traditional polishing methods and follow the guidelines set forth by the liquid manufacturer prior to using this procedure. I have always stated that this procedure is not for
newbies and that this method is
not a replacement for a rotary. Rather, it is simply an alternative method that I use which can deliver a higher degree of success (in terms of defect removal and finishing capability).
The products I've used this procedure with the most are Meguiar's M86 and M105, so that should be kept in mind. Why is there no short answer? Quite simply because the short answer gives directions only, and no theory. Is that really teaching anything?

For quite some time I just e-mailed guys that wanted to know how I was applying M86 and M105 with a random orbital because neither was officially recommended for use with the random orbital. First it was a one-page e-mail, the two, then three. As I kept chasing my tail trying to supplement the procedure, I decided to write about some of the theory behind why I thought it worked so well. Well, it ended up at twenty pages with only four diagrams to take up space. A very boring read unless a guy was truly interested in the theory behind the method!
Once it was finished (a little over a year ago), I had a few guys read it and it became painfully obvious that more diagrams would improve the paper, so I began creating them. I am still not done, and believe me- I wish I was. Time constraints have slowed the completion of the document, but the time is near. Why did I start discussing the "KBM" online? Because
Todd Helme aka TH0001 mentioned he used
"Kevin Brown's methods of madness" to polish a 1948 Lincoln Zephyr, and the inquiries began.
There is a huge thread of information over on detailingworld that I recently put together after a guy posted his, a-hem... interest in my paper.

I have already been busted for unintentionally linking to another site, so if anyone wants to see the biggest group of information pertaining to the KBM, they've kindly placed it in their
Detailing Guide forum, and it is super easy to find.
I am most excited about this: No longer is the random orbital looked upon as an "electric wax applicator", or as a "hazemaker". For some time it was perceived by the big guns as the sissies machine. Some rotary guys still don't like it, and that is fine. I am not writing this paper for them! :surrender:
KBM points to consider when using a random orbital:
Maximize the polishing capabilities of the pad by thoroughly priming it with the buffing liquid.
Minimize the cushioning effects of the pad by applying downward pressure to the machine.
Adjust downward pressure to maintain
some random rotation of the backing plate.
More rotation is better for defect removal.
Less rotation is better for final polishing.
Clean the pad throughout the process. Compressed air is BY FAR the best tool for the job.
Maintain pressure throughout the polishing cycle. This goes for defect removal as well as final polishing.
Prepare the pad for final polishing by priming it and then letting it sit for a couple minutes. Prior to use, remove the excess product from the pad by placing the pad face onto a microfiber towel. Run the machine for a few seconds until the excess material is removed. Then, apply small amounts of buffing liquid as needed. The goal is to have enough polish available to abrade paint away, but not so much that there are clumps of buffing liquid on the pad face or in the pore structure of the pad.
Introducing a spritz of water or detail spray is a no-no because although cutting power may increase, so too will scouring. Besides- wet pads are not helpful.
If scouring is noticeable when the buffing liquid is applied by machine but not by hand, then the pad is the culprit- not the machine. Use a different pad (size or material), or adjust pressure, speed, and amount of product until satisfactory results are achieved.
Thanks again! :buffing: