yinzer
New member
- Sep 14, 2014
- 11
- 0
Hi all,
So if you clay (if needed) and polish to get rid of defects that you won't need a cleaner before sealing/waxing?
But when doing research on the difference between SF400 & SF4000 that SF4500 left oils (or something) that would need to be removed.
So I'm curious about a scenario where using a true cleaner would be working backwards or negative. And it seems that at least some polishes would need either an AIO or a cleaner before the LSP.
~~~
FWIW I've tried Poor Boys, and Meg's 105 -202. I'm sticking with Menzerna FG-400 SF4000 for polishing (so for me my above question is moot, I'm just curious). If no corrections are needed then Sealing Wax APO 60. LSP Deep Gloss Paint Sealant 3.0 and maybe a wax.
So I guess that my Wolfgang Polish Enhancer was a wasted purchase.
TIA
Mike Phillips said:Common bit of confusion there.... a paint cleaner is an either/or type product. You either use a paint cleaner to prep paint before applying a non-cleaning wax or sealant or you polish the paint but you don't do both.
So if you clay (if needed) and polish to get rid of defects that you won't need a cleaner before sealing/waxing?
Mike Phillips said:<SF 4500 is an Ultra Fine Cut Polish
But when doing research on the difference between SF400 & SF4000 that SF4500 left oils (or something) that would need to be removed.
So I'm curious about a scenario where using a true cleaner would be working backwards or negative. And it seems that at least some polishes would need either an AIO or a cleaner before the LSP.
~~~
FWIW I've tried Poor Boys, and Meg's 105 -202. I'm sticking with Menzerna FG-400 SF4000 for polishing (so for me my above question is moot, I'm just curious). If no corrections are needed then Sealing Wax APO 60. LSP Deep Gloss Paint Sealant 3.0 and maybe a wax.
So I guess that my Wolfgang Polish Enhancer was a wasted purchase.
TIA