1st day with my Flex 3401

I imagine anyone familiar with the use of a Rotary Polisher would maybe not have a difficult transition to the Flex 3401.

I think I can talk from a bit of experience, is to use one of those "boat anchor" Christopher Columbus Milwaukee Rotarys with Wool Pad from 30-40 years ago, and you'll truly understand the definition, and meaning of "walking"! LOL

Closing my eyes, and seeing myself with one of these in hand years ago, I could make a comic movie! That ain't no crap!

The Flex has to be a breeze by comparison.
 
If you're a beginner, get a GG 6" DA or 3401. The Rupes LHR21 takes very good technique to get the most out of it, especially on non-flat panels.
 
I imagine anyone familiar with the use of a Rotary Polisher would maybe not have a difficult transition to the Flex 3401.

I think I can talk from a bit of experience, is to use one of those "boat anchor" Christopher Columbus Milwaukee Rotarys with Wool Pad from 30-40 years ago, and you'll truly understand the definition, and meaning of "walking"! LOL


Closing my eyes, and seeing myself with one of these in hand years ago, I could make a comic movie! That ain't no crap!

The Flex has to be a breeze by comparison.
I'd be scared to near machine like that :eek:.

I didn't want to make it sound like the Flex was difficult to use, it isn't, just a small learning curve to get used to it. I'm a newbie when it comes to machine polishing but it only took a couple of section passes to figure it out.
 
Y'all running 6.5 Hybrids or 5inch?

I have the 4 3/8 BP, trying to pick
 
I like the new Meg's foam pass better than the hybrid pads.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I like the new Meg's foam pass better than the hybrid pads.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why do you like the Meg's pads better?

I bought some the Meguiars pads before I got the Flex and was planning on using them with my GG DA. Then ended up getting some Hybrids after reading how everyone really liked how they worked with the Flex.
 
Why do you like the Meg's pads better?

I bought some the Meguiars pads before I got the Flex and was planning on using them with my GG DA. Then ended up getting some Hybrids after reading how everyone really liked how they worked with the Flex.

The hybrid pads lose their firmness after a bit of polishing; they become mushy. The Meg's new foam pads do not do that. They also make the 3401 enjoyable to use.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Why do you like the Meg's pads better?

I bought some the Meguiars pads before I got the Flex and was planning on using them with my GG DA. Then ended up getting some Hybrids after reading how everyone really liked how they worked with the Flex.

i've used the new megs foam (yellow polishing) with the GG6 and it works well, though IME it seems to soak up product a little faster (a little softer as well) due to how thin they are. if I were to do order them for the first time at a minimum I would order at least five. one can never have enough pads...
 
The hybrid pads lose their firmness after a bit of polishing; they become mushy.

Actually.... all foam pads lose their firmness as they become wet with product. That's the nature of foam.



The Meg's new foam pads do not do that.

I would have to disagree with you on that. Even the maroon foam cutting pad softens up with use like all foam cutting pads.

A few pictures of the pads after we buffed out this completely swirled out Camaro and with time and repeated introduction of fresh product to any foam pad the pad will soften and as Mark says, become mushy.


NEW! Meguiar’s Foam Buffing Discs


watermark.php


watermark.php





They also make the 3401 enjoyable to use.

You mean the Meguiar's foam pads make the Flex 3401 more enjoyable to use over any other foam pad or just over the Hybrid pads?

How?



:dunno:
 
I'm aware all foam pads lose their firmness to some degree during polishing. Some become more mushy than others. Over time during a polishing session, the Meg's maroon cutting pad holds it's firmness better than the hybrid orange and blue, IME.

I didn't mean the Meg's foam pads make the machine more enjoyable over the hybrid pads, it was more of a general statement.
 
Just to note...

I show and recommend the Meguiar's foam pads for the Flex 3401 in my new Flex 3401 how-to book. You'll find a picture of the pads and my comments about the thick versus thin version on page 18.


Little tidbit of information...

This how-to book became available to the public about one week before SEMA started. At that time the pads were still top secret as they were to be announced and introduced to the world at SEMA.


watermark.php




Was a simple oversight but not a single person spotted these and broke the news in the forum world. Also shown in the Flex 3401 book were the new Sonax products on page 28.


Click here to get your own copy



:xyxthumbs:
 
Just to note...

I show and recommend the Meguiar's foam pads for the Flex 3401 in my new Flex 3401 how-to book. You'll find a picture of the pads and my comments about the thick versus thin version on page 18.


Little tidbit of information...

This how-to book became available to the public about one week before SEMA started. At that time the pads were still top secret as they were to be announced and introduced to the world at SEMA.


watermark.php




Was a simple oversight but not a single person spotted these and broke the news in the forum world. Also shown in the Flex 3401 book were the new Sonax products on page 28.


Click here to get your own copy



:xyxthumbs:
Although they're the same colors, aren't the 7" soft buff rotary pads different foam compared to the new DA foam discs?
 
While we are on the subject of Pads used for the Flex 3401, and in regards to other non-forced rotation DAs I have some questions regarding such?

Would one say that the Flex by its forced rotation feature, it is harder on any given foam Pad per se, or no?

Like it is noted by you folks, pads lose their firmness due to product absorbtion. I imagine heat too also breaks down a pad.


With a machine like the PC7424XP, I note that one usually by its design has to use either speeds 5 or 6 for correcting, otherwise Pad-Plate Rotation suffers.

Now with the Flex 3401, is it a quality due to forced rotation, that one doesn't necessarily have to run the machine "full out" at its highest speeds to be effective? Thus perhaps actually less detrimental to shortening pad life because of this? Meaning there's actually less heat generated?

Hope the way I worded my questions is understandable.
Thanks, Mark
 
Nice work OP. I've been a flex guy for over a yr now. I tried the LHR15, it was ok for a couple months until it broke. Now I use the 3401 and PE-14 in tandem. One of the best 1-2 punches in the business!!
 
We also did my friends older 4runner.

Using D151 and orange pads. He used a PC on half, I used the Flex on half. Not racing, just a quick AIO one step going our own pace. Speed 5 on Flex, Speed 5.5-6 on PC.

I finished about 15 minutes before he did, and my side had much better depth and clarity. The Flex just ripped right through it.
 
While we are on the subject of Pads used for the Flex 3401, and in regards to other non-forced rotation DAs I have some questions regarding such?

Would one say that the Flex by its forced rotation feature, it is harder on any given foam Pad per se, or no?

The answer is yes but due to the ability to push the machine harder than a free rotating spindle machine my guess and experience is guys DO tend to push the machine harder, (I know I do), and thus it's not just the machine being harder on pads it's us. :D


Like it is noted by you folks, pads lose their firmness due to product absorption. I imagine heat too also breaks down a pad.

Pressure over time creates heat. So pressing a pad against a panel and buffing creates heat. The longer you buff, the harder you push the more heat you create.

The violent oscillating action plus any chemical seepage to the adhesive and Velcro of both the pad and the backing plate PLUS the heat created by pressure over time, all of these factors affect pads in a negative manner but that's the nature of the beast.



With a machine like the PC7424XP, I note that one usually by its design has to use either speeds 5 or 6 for correcting, otherwise Pad-Plate Rotation suffers.

I'm pretty much on the 6 for everything by light polishing or machine sanding.


Now with the Flex 3401, is it a quality due to forced rotation, that one doesn't necessarily have to run the machine "full out" at its highest speeds to be effective?

Some people like to use the lower speeds for correction work, I think that's the jist of Mike aka smack's technique for using the Flex 3401.


My take on it is I tend to always recommend a range to other people and let them decide what speed works best for them tailored to their,

  • Pads
  • Chemicals
  • Working climate (low/high temperatures, inside/outside, windy or no wind)
  • Type of cars and thus type of paint
  • Type of cars and thus type of body panels
I just find to state a specific speed setting to be kind of limiting when I deal with people that live all over the world. Whether coming to this forum or coming to my class. For example I have a guy coming to my class this weekend from New Zealand, about 8000 miles away. I'm not going to tell him in his location for his cars for his pads and products a specific speed to use any tool but instead a range that is known to work.


Me? If I'm doing correction work with the Flex 3401 I'm almost always on the 6 speed setting for a number of reasons, one is there's actually VALUE to just being able to knock out the correction step as fast as you can.

I switch cutting pads out often so pad condition is a huge variable to speed when doing correction work.


Thus perhaps actually less detrimental to shortening pad life because of this? Meaning there's actually less heat generated?

I would agree that running the Flex at a slower speed setting would be less destructive on pads in general.


Hope the way I worded my questions is understandable.
Thanks, Mark


Always clear Mark.


:dblthumb2:
 
We also did my friends older 4runner.

Using D151 and orange pads. He used a PC on half, I used the Flex on half. Not racing, just a quick AIO one step going our own pace. Speed 5 on Flex, Speed 5.5-6 on PC.

I finished about 15 minutes before he did, and my side had much better depth and clarity. The Flex just ripped right through it.


For the last three years I've taught a class at Mobile Tech Expo called,

How to detail faster and maximize profits

The description for the class reads,


Mike Phillips, author of How to use the Flex 3401, will show you how to turn the Flex 3401 Forced Rotation Dual Action Polisher into your own money making machine for doing both production detailing and show car detailing.


The classroom this year hold 147 people and every seat was taken.


2015 Mobile Tech Expo Class Schedule




The key is to use the softest pad you can get away with and cleaner/waxes that use great abrasive technology.

And do a Test Spot first... or course...



:)
 
That's my second class at Mobile Tech Expo


Class 2 - How to reduce correction time and make more money


:props:

I can't wait to take your classes when I get back to the states Mike - you've truly been an inspiration to me and following your sage advice I've been able to take my business to the next level.
 
Back
Top