Mckees Krystal Ceramic Wax vs 3 comps

acuRAS82

acuRAS82

New member
Joined
May 30, 2017
Messages
2,847
Reaction score
0
I received Mckees 37 Krystal Diamond SiO2 Ceramic Wax today. It came packaged similar to other PBMG waxes (I know M37 is no longer PBMG, but w/e):
View attachment 67927View attachment 67928View attachment 67929


I decided to do a very small scale comparison test of this new wax versus 3 competitors.
I don’t have a car in need of protection right now, but the top, back tailgate panel of my X5 was repainted around 7 weeks ago and is currently bare, and would serve as the test specimen. I cleaned, polished and then prepped per the pic below:
View attachment 67930
View attachment 67931


The 4 ceramic waxes all include SiO2 plus carnauba:
A) PBL Synergy
B) Mckees 37 Krystal Diamond SiO2 Ceramic Wax
C) IGL EcoCoat Wax
D) Dodo Juice Supernatural Hybrid Nano
Control: Angelwax Enigma which is applied on the rest of the car.
View attachment 67933


Synergy and Nano are very hard waxes and have a mild smell of solvents (I think?), whereas EcoCoat and the new Krystal Wax are what I consider soft waxes if going by Dodo Juice standards (basically same consistency as most PBMG waxes as well). Both EcoCoat and Krystal smell good... EcoCoat like a fruit punch, and Krystal smells strongly like an oceanside resort. Nick explains it better in his new video, and I basically agree with his description. Here’s how the waxes look:
View attachment 67934


I applied each in the same order listed and shown above, going from driver side to passenger side of the top tailgate. Synergy and Nano went on very thin, Krystal and EcoCoat were a bit thicker consistency.
View attachment 67935View attachment 67936View attachment 67937View attachment 67938

*Note that I also reinforced Enigma around the tail lights and paint adjacent to this panel since my polisher went over some places to get corners, and I didn’t feel like taping.

The directions for these vary from leaving on for 10 minutes, up to 30 minutes. I let them all sit for 35 minutes so everything is equal. Wiping off was easy for all 4, but if I had to rank, I would have Synergy as easiest, then Nano, then Krystal, then EcoCoat. Here’s some pics after wiping:
View attachment 67939
View attachment 67940
View attachment 67941View attachment 67942View attachment 67943View attachment 67944


All pictures were taken in my garage at night time. I’ll let these cure 24 hours and snap some better pics. The car will likely stay dry until Thursday when it may rain, otherwise I’ll do some beading comps with the hose.

Thanks for reading my tiny test (better than nothing hopefully)!
 
Great initial post. Looking forward to how they all perform once the weather hits...

Man I’m gone for just a couple of months and I feel like I’ve missed out on so much new stuff I’ve never seen before. Lol.

Btw, what’s going on with your rear window? Lol.
 
Eldorado2k said:
Great initial post. Looking forward to how they all perform once the weather hits...

Man I’m gone for just a couple of months and I feel like I’ve missed out on so much new stuff I’ve never seen before. Lol.

Btw, what’s going on with your rear window? Lol.
Click to expand...
Back window has some polish splatter... Or am I missing something else?


By the way, I forgot to mention originally: none of the four felt sealant-slick after application, but they all have that smooth carnauba feel. I couldn’t tell differences in slickness but had my wife come check it out. She thought the Ecoshine may have been the slickest, with no additional #2-4 rankings for the other 3.
 
How was application compared to synergy. Can you look at it in the sun to see which one wiped the cleanest.
 
fightnews said:
How was application compared to synergy. Can you look at it in the sun to see which one wiped the cleanest.
Click to expand...

Application wasn’t much different other than it loaded on the applicator thicker and therefore wasn’t as easy to apply thin. This makes sense I think because Synergy spreads really far and boasts about 25 applications out of 5oz whereas Krystal claims 25 apps out of 8oz. It wiped off easily though. Both directions are to wipe off after hazing which takes about 10 mins (I waited 30+ though). Both required almost no pressure to wipe off. If I had to give an edge, Synergy would get the win, likely because it was applied thinner though.

I will check it in the sun Monday night (if we have sun, it’s supposed to rain all day) or Tuesday morning to look for residue or other wipe off issues.... I do recall your Synergy issues with wiping off. I haven’t noticed any issues with Synergy leaving residue or marks, but haven’t put much effort to do so. I will check all 4 closely.
 
Update 9/26/19:
The test panel saw a bit of rain this morning. Not enough to see great accumulation on the vertical panel but here’s the pictures anyways (from left to right looking at back panel; NOTE: The bottom half of each picture is the panel. The top half of each picture is the rear window.)
View attachment 67975

PBL Synergy (Enigma on left side panel)
View attachment 67974View attachment 67976View attachment 67977

Mckees Krystal Wax
View attachment 67978View attachment 67979

IGL EcoShine Wax
View attachment 67980View attachment 67979
*Pulled out wiper which was blocking some water:View attachment 67981


Dodo Juice Nano (Enigma on right side panel)
View attachment 67982View attachment 67983


Not the most exciting pictures due to the weakness of the rain event. I’ll either do a hose-down later; or Saturday 9/28 it should rain again.


My observations, whether meaningful or not due to lack of rain / angles of panel:

- Synergy side has least amount of drops remaining and smallest drops.

- Dodo Nano is second for both (beads on top ridge look not uniform because of angle, not LSPs fault).

- Krystal is 3rd for both, but a few beads on the top ridge are not uniform.

- IGL EcoShine had the most beads remaining and largest bead sizes. Possible asterisk: the wiper above may have interfered with how and when the rain dropped down this section of the panel.

Hopefully some better results and observations to cone in the next few days.
 
Update 9/27/19:

I was able do some water testing on the back panel today.
Video:

YouTube

I tried to take the sheeting photos (second photo) the moment after turning the hose off for each photo combo below. The third picture is a second, separate try to better catch the sheeting in a picture.

PBL Synergy
View attachment 67993View attachment 67994
View attachment 67995


Mckees Krystal
View attachment 67996View attachment 67997
View attachment 67998


IGL EcoShine Wax
View attachment 67999View attachment 68000
View attachment 68001


Dodo Nano
View attachment 68002View attachment 68004
View attachment 68005


All of them are newly applied ceramic waxes on a vertical panel, so it was hard to capture the speed of sheeting in pictures, but they all sheet awesomely. But this would be boring if I left it at that, and it’s easier to see small differences in real time than it is in pictures.

My observation/summaries:
- Synergy and Dodo reflect the water immediately, it appears to fall faster than gravity can cause. I can’t see any dripping effect, water bounces off immediately.
- IGL EcoShine sheets 3rd fastest, I can see the stream of water dripping down for a quarter second before the panel appears dry.
- Mckees Krystal sheets the slowest, I can see the stream of water drip down for a half second before the panel appears dry.

As I mentioned prior, the entire panel has amazing water behavior. But the slight performance edges are in order of price, as is how I view the ease of application/removal as well.
 
acuRAS82 said:
Application wasn’t much different other than it loaded on the applicator thicker and therefore wasn’t as easy to apply thin. This makes sense I think because Synergy spreads really far and boasts about 25 applications out of 5oz whereas Krystal claims 25 apps out of 8oz. It wiped off easily though. Both directions are to wipe off after hazing which takes about 10 mins (I waited 30+ though). Both required almost no pressure to wipe off. If I had to give an edge, Synergy would get the win, likely because it was applied thinner though.

I will check it in the sun Monday night (if we have sun, it’s supposed to rain all day) or Tuesday morning to look for residue or other wipe off issues.... I do recall your Synergy issues with wiping off. I haven’t noticed any issues with Synergy leaving residue or marks, but haven’t put much effort to do so. I will check all 4 closely.
Click to expand...

Thanks I bought a can of mckees I might apply it today and post picks.
 
fightnews said:
Thanks I bought a can of mckees I might apply it today and post picks.
Click to expand...

I do apologize that I never checked really close (different lighting angles) for marks left behind by Synergy or Krystal. To the naked eye under normal lighting, they look great.
 
acuRAS82 said:
I do apologize that I never checked really close (different lighting angles) for marks left behind by Synergy or Krystal. To the naked eye under normal lighting, they look great.
Click to expand...

No problem thanks, I wanted to share that as a prep wash before installing this stuff I used the Gtech citrus foam with a couple ounces of Ps21 total auto wash mixed in a foam cannon. This is a good combo I think when you want a tad stronger wash on your paint protection before topping it with something like this wax.

I use it as a pre soak where I keep reapplying the foam while I go around doing the trim, tires, windows, whatever. It takes about 10 min and I'll refoam like 3 times. Then I just do a normal bucket wash with reset or whatever coating or regular wash you feel like using.

It works really good cause they are both citrus based cleaners
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top