erichaley
New member
- Apr 27, 2013
- 844
- 0
Have you tested this? Because it does not make intuitive sense. The paint is 50x thicker than opticoat, so if a rock has enough energy to displace that much paint the opticoat should offer little or no additional protection.
There are several threads on Autopia about this and the consensus is that it wont protect against chips.
But if you have performed some sort of test Id love to hear about it.
I have not had a chance to fully test this yet. I am currently basing this opinion on the fact that Opti-Coat is harder and has greater scratch/mar resistance. If you put a harder substance over a softer substance, you're going to add a certain degree of protection to that softer surface. Now the million-dollar question is, how much? With soft Honda paint, I'm going to take what I can get, even if its only a 1% reduction in chip resistance.
My belief is that most of the "rock chips" we Honda owners see - particularly on the 2013 Accord - are actually the result of bug impacts, and are the primary type of damage I am trying to reduce. They aren't necessarily "chips" in that the paint is still intact, rather they are more like tiny craters. Lots of tiny craters...
There is a thread over on Optimum's forum that states Opti-Coat will protect against chips.
Maybe we have differing opinions as to what "protect" means? Does it mean "eliminate" or does it mean "reduce"?