zmcgovern45
New member
- Sep 5, 2012
- 3,443
- 0
So I don't think anyone has asked this...
but why not just step up to a more aggressive product like FG400 instead of making multiple passes with small pads over the same area with a finishing polish? You can still achieve fantastic results with these heavier cutting products if you work them long enough on rock hard paint.
FF3000 has a cut level of "4" and gloss level of "9" while FG400 has a cut level of "9" and gloss level of "7". Using FG400 definitely would have allowed you to use a pad like 5.5" and then you could have finished with SF4500 (cut of "2" and gloss of "10") if your inspection revealed any haze remaining from the compound. It just seems way more tedious trying to knock out defects on rock hard paint with a finishing polish and a tiny pad.
Anyway, car looks great!
but why not just step up to a more aggressive product like FG400 instead of making multiple passes with small pads over the same area with a finishing polish? You can still achieve fantastic results with these heavier cutting products if you work them long enough on rock hard paint.
FF3000 has a cut level of "4" and gloss level of "9" while FG400 has a cut level of "9" and gloss level of "7". Using FG400 definitely would have allowed you to use a pad like 5.5" and then you could have finished with SF4500 (cut of "2" and gloss of "10") if your inspection revealed any haze remaining from the compound. It just seems way more tedious trying to knock out defects on rock hard paint with a finishing polish and a tiny pad.
Anyway, car looks great!