PA DETAILER
Well-known member
- Mar 5, 2011
- 6,017
- 251
- Thread starter
- #21
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just trying to get caught up here, I didn't read the whole thread closely, but when I saw the title I figured the 700+ HP cars were going away, but the link showed only 400 something HP--why is this car stickered at over $100K?
The SRT DEMON is 797 HP. Last call this year on Dodge's high HP vehicles. Including RAM TRX.
Ok that's what I figured. A few weeks ago I was talking to someone about the doom-and-gloomers who think the electrification of cars is going to result in boring cars, I was reminding them of 40 years ago, with the nexus of fuel economy and emissions regulations choked all the horsepower and driveablity out of cars, those of you who are old enough (or Klasse, the walking encyclopedia) will remember those anemic days. But the result of that was new technology and fantastic cars, culminating in these Chrysler's with just ungodly HP.
I will admit that there are a few out there that I'm warming up to. There is a kid in our hood that has a WRX that I think is around a 2012 that I like the lower RPM growl. I think those engines have many various exhaust notes depending on your aftermarket choice.
There are several vehicles from those times that I truly love, even though the power level was soooo bad. The Buick Grand National was a huge surprise to many of us back in the 80's lol.
The GN started in 82' and they weren't all black, actually two-tone silver and black w/4.1L V6's, not turbocharged but apparently they made a handful 3.8L V6 turbos for 82'...NO GN's for 83, just like no Corvettes for 83'.I always considered the beginning of the Grand National to be '84, but apparently it goes back further than that, and I guess I don't remember the T-Types starting as early as they apparently did. I do seem to recall Buick not being able to publish the actual HP number of the later GN's because it was higher than the Corvette, and Lloyd Reuss getting in a bit of trouble over that (I see he died a year or so ago).
But I was thinking 82'ish, or maybe it started with that EPA change in '81, when the GM cars wouldn't run when they were cold because they had the idle mixture turned down so low to meet the cold start emissions. That and the Crossfire engine in the 'Vette, and if I recall, the '82 Rabbit GTI had the fastest 0-60 time of any car C/D tested that year, at 10.something seconds. Dark days. But all that stuff started to turn around by the mid-'80's with the introduction of fuel injection, etc.