rockford33
New member
- Oct 12, 2010
- 162
- 0
I did a search, but came up with many, many posts with "test spot" in them, so I apologize if this has been covered before and I missed it.
I recently watched Mike's video on doing a test spot. In the video, he just did a spot in the center of the hood (I understand for demonstration purposes only). Unless I missed it in the video, I didn't hear/see anything about how he chose the test spot. Since a typical car will have different levels of swirls on it (hood might be real bad, roof not so bad), how do you choose a test spot?
If you choose the worst looking area, you might be too aggressive on other areas that aren't as bad (therefore not using the "least aggressive pad/polish" theory). If you choose a spot that is not that bad, you might not have the right combo to get out swirls, RIDS, etc. elsewhere on the car.
I guess you would go with an average area (not super swirled/scratched, but with some defects)? This way, areas with worse defects might need a little more work/passes, etc. and areas with very light or minimal defects would not be overly corrected. Does that sound right?
Thanks,
Neil
I recently watched Mike's video on doing a test spot. In the video, he just did a spot in the center of the hood (I understand for demonstration purposes only). Unless I missed it in the video, I didn't hear/see anything about how he chose the test spot. Since a typical car will have different levels of swirls on it (hood might be real bad, roof not so bad), how do you choose a test spot?
If you choose the worst looking area, you might be too aggressive on other areas that aren't as bad (therefore not using the "least aggressive pad/polish" theory). If you choose a spot that is not that bad, you might not have the right combo to get out swirls, RIDS, etc. elsewhere on the car.
I guess you would go with an average area (not super swirled/scratched, but with some defects)? This way, areas with worse defects might need a little more work/passes, etc. and areas with very light or minimal defects would not be overly corrected. Does that sound right?
Thanks,
Neil