collinite 845 Over Ceramic Coating?

bryanviper said:
True, this is to put on family members cars that do not maintain the paint. No more ceramic coating for them :laughing: However collinite 845 will at least be easier/quicker to apply and last longer then reload. Also for them I dont think they will even notice the Hydrophobic properties.

Thanks
Click to expand...

In this case, I say go for it. It's not like the paint is going to melt off.
 
Sleeping on what I mentioned in full in my few posts, I should have mentioned a disclaimer.

Firstly, I'm not a chemical engineer, so I cannot technically know on many basis' of what the possible detrimental effects of products like #845 or other "unorthodox" products used as toppers applied on freshly applied, or intact ceramic coatings might have?

I might guess for the obvious reasons that one might not want to be using certain AIO's if they have abrasives, there's the possibility that certain other products that have detergents-cleaners in them could possibly have a negative effect on a coating.

And when I say a negative effect, I'm not so much talking about lesser changes like altering hydrophobic qualities, I'm largely referring to the damage and removal of such coatings and drastically shortening-affecting their durability and life. Two of the major reasons people use and want coatings on their paint.

Again, I might "guess" one would not want aggressive LSP's like AIO products, but I cannot proclaim with any certainty and authority that products such as Collinite, or lets say other beauty waxes with not much in the way of cleaners, like Fuzion, Midnight Sun, Zymol, etc., and products along this nature won't somehow "chemically attack" such coatings?

I'll assume Carpro, and other companies have chosen products such as Reload, and others recommending C2V3, BF Coating Booster, etc., for the obvious reasons of retaining much of the original coating's qualities and behavior, and as well being the least harmful products to not effect longevity of such coatings.

Reason I personally reached for #845 in this instance was that I basically have no coating left on my vehicle at this point in time, and I desired something that would give me good paint protection for the time being.
 
Same with the car I plan on applying 845 on. coating is over a year old, has not been maintained & winter is coming up. I probably wont have time to touch their car again before winter so I want to get a layer of protection down on it to help. I'm not concerned about the coating & they dont even know what a coating is & I did it for free anyways (Family member). Cant wait to try it.

Thanks

MarkD51 said:
Sleeping on what I mentioned in full in my few posts, I should have mentioned a disclaimer.

Firstly, I'm not a chemical engineer, so I cannot technically know on many basis' of what the possible detrimental effects of products like #845 or other "unorthodox" products used as toppers applied on freshly applied, or intact ceramic coatings might have?

I might guess for the obvious reasons that one might not want to be using certain AIO's if they have abrasives, there's the possibility that certain other products that have detergents-cleaners in them could possibly have a negative effect on a coating.

And when I say a negative effect, I'm not so much talking about lesser changes like altering hydrophobic qualities, I'm largely referring to the damage and removal of such coatings and drastically shortening-affecting their durability and life. Two of the major reasons people use and want coatings on their paint.

Again, I might "guess" one would not want aggressive LSP's like AIO products, but I cannot proclaim with any certainty and authority that products such as Collinite, or lets say other beauty waxes with not much in the way of cleaners, like Fuzion, Midnight Sun, Zymol, etc., and products along this nature won't somehow "chemically attack" such coatings?

I'll assume Carpro, and other companies have chosen products such as Reload, and others recommending C2V3, BF Coating Booster, etc., for the obvious reasons of retaining much of the original coating's qualities and behavior, and as well being the least harmful products to not effect longevity of such coatings.

Reason I personally reached for #845 in this instance was that I basically have no coating left on my vehicle at this point in time, and I desired something that would give me good paint protection for the time being.
Click to expand...
 
No clue as to how it will operate on a coating. I just came in to say that I also love 845. It's my go to. The reflections, the water beading, and longevity are all at the top of my list for everything I've tried. The price truly makes it a no brainer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top