DeWALT DWP849X vs Makita 9227C Rotary Buffers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mike Phillips
  • Start date Start date
M

Mike Phillips

Guest
DeWALT DWP849X vs Makita 9227C Rotary Buffers

DeWALTvsMakita000.jpg


First both tools are exceptionally well built, strong performers for their class which is Full Size Rotary Buffers. This article is just to give you a close-up look at each tool with high resolution pictures, resized for easy viewing on any computer monitor. The goal of this article is to simply let you see up close, what each tool looks like and offers in the way of design, fit and finish.

If you attend any of the classes offered here at Autogeek you are always encouraged to take both of these tools as well as all the tools we carry for a test drive and see for yourself, which tools fits you best.


Left: DeWALT DWP849X Right: Makita 9227C Rotary Buffers
DeWALTvsMakita001.jpg



The DeWALT DWP849X
DeWALTvsMakita002.jpg




The DeWALT comes with a soft rubber cap over the head of the polisher. This serves two function,

1. It makes gripping and holding onto the head comfortable and secure.

2. It acts as a bumper to prevent scratching or marring if you accidentally bump the head of the polisher into any painted surface an other components.
DeWALTvsMakita003.jpg



DeWALTvsMakita004.jpg



Soft Rubber Tool Rest
There is as soft rubber horizontal tool rest across the top of the DeWALT at both the front and the back. This keeps the tool from sliding off a smooth surface or even scratching it should you lay the polisher down when not in use.

DeWALTvsMakita005.jpg



Below you can see the rear soft rubber tool rest and also note the speed selector is recessed to help prevent accidental changes in speed while using the tool.
DeWALTvsMakita006.jpg



Recessed Lock Button
The drive gear lock button is also recessed to prevent you from accidentally pressing the button when gripping the head of the unit while running the buffer.
DeWALTvsMakita007.jpg




Wool Ingestion Shields
The fresh air intake has a wire mesh shield to help prevent wool fibers and other debris from being sucked into the motor and body cavity.
DeWALTvsMakita008.jpg


DeWALTvsMakita019.jpg




The Makita 9227C
DeWALTvsMakita009.jpg


Powder Coated Head
The head unit of the Makita Rotary Buffer comes with a powder coating that is corrosion resistant.
DeWALTvsMakita013.jpg




Metal Tool Stands
Their are two raised metal tool stands at the head of the polisher stable when placed upside down and not in use.

DeWALTvsMakita010.jpg


At the end of the tool there is a hard plastic tool stand and the variable speed dial is exposed.
DeWALTvsMakita011.jpg



Semi-Recessed Lock Button
The locking button for the drive gears is semi-recessed with a raised ring surrounding the button to help prevent accidental engagement while operating the buffer.
DeWALTvsMakita012.jpg



Side Air Vents
DeWALTvsMakita013.jpg


DeWALTvsMakita020.jpg




Product shots for dimension reference
DeWALTvsMakita014.jpg


DeWALTvsMakita016.jpg


DeWALTvsMakita017.jpg



On Autogeek.net

DeWalt DWP849X 7”/9” Variable Speed Rotary Polisher

Makita 9227C Rotary Polisher


DeWALTvsMakita015.jpg
 
Great info Mike. I sold my Makita 9227C and purchased the DeWalt 849X. Couldn't be happier.
 
I feel like between the two, the DeWalt 849X is the only way to go
 
As someone who has worked in the construction for many of my younger years, i always purchased Dewalt. They have always been the most durable tools ive ever tried. They can take some serious abuse and still work like new. +1 for Dewalt tools!!
 
Interesting, there is no mention on weight comparison between the 2.

From memory DeWalt is a bit heavier, but this needs to be confirmed.

Anyone aware of 849X made in 220Volt version?
 
Interesting, there is no mention on weight comparison between the 2.

From memory DeWalt is a bit heavier, but this needs to be confirmed.

?

I guess it's a little bit lighter yeah the old one was a monster and used to give me back problems

DeWault specs-

No Load Speed
0-600 / 0-3,500rpm
Spindle Thread
5/8"-11
Spindle Lock
Yes
Tool Length
17.3"
Tool Weight
6.5 lbs



Makita Specs
-

No Load Speed
600-3,000rpm
Spindle Thread
5/8"-11
Spindle Lock
Yes
Overall Length
18.5"
Tool Weight
6.6 lbs

but this also says the makita is a little bit longer which does not seem like it from the pictures Idk if the measurements were done different :dunno:
 
With all the rotary discussions going on, this thread is perfect timing...

Thanks Mike! :props:
 
Does anyone know if either of these are made in the US? I doubt it but would be a deciding factor for me.
 
Well i cant edit but if i wouldve lookd at the pics the dewalt says made in China and the Makita says assembled in U.S.A.
 
Well i cant edit but if i wouldve looked at the pics the DeWALT says made in China and the Makita says assembled in U.S.A.


That's why I took pictures of the labels to answer this type of question...



:)
 
Mike, great post. Thanks

Your thoughts on Dewalt DWP849X vs. Flex PE14-2-150
 
Mike, great post. Thanks

Your thoughts on Dewalt DWP849X vs. Flex PE14-2-150

I've already posted my thoughts a number of times but it's a great questions so here you go,

They are two different categories of buffers, one is a full size and one is a compact size. Your comparing apples to oranges as I originally posted in post #45 in this thread,

Here's two excerpts...

Mike Phillips said:
More reciprocating mass creates more torque
My personal thoughts are that if you're going to be buffing out sanding marks all day long or removing oxidation from large boats all day long then a full size rotary buffer would be a better choice.

The gears are bigger in size as are the rest of the components in a full size rotary buffer and I think having more reciprocating mass creates more torque and this is something you would want if you're going to be doing heavy compounding and polishing with full size pads, (8" and larger), 6 days a week.


Mike Phillips said:
Apples to Oranges
Comparing the Flex PE14 to any of the full size DeWALT rotary buffers, or the Makita, or any other brand of full size rotary buffers is like comparing apples to oranges in that the Flex PE14 is a true compact rotary buffer and falls into the Compact Size category, while the DeWALT DWP849X falls into the Full Size category for rotary buffers.


That's just two excerpts from that thread, the entire thread is basically a how-to article on how to use a rotary buffer including finishing out with only a rotary buffer for a show car finish.

49SedanDelivery0042.jpg


49SedanDelivery0043.jpg


49SedanDelivery0050.jpg


49SedanDelivery0052.jpg



If your budget only allows the purchase of one rotary buffer then a full size rotary buffer is probably the best option and at this time I think DeWALT has the best bang for the buck.

If your budget allows for more tools now or down the road it's really hard to beat the compact size and lightweight of the Flex PE14 Rotary Polisher for doing surgical buffing and intricate work.

Two different categories.


Good question.

I suggest getting both and using the right tool for the job.


:dblthumb2:
 
Having used both the Dewalt is a superior tool IMO. The build quality just seems higher when holding it in your hands. Also it runs smoother and is much quieter than the Makita. I have one and it gets more use than any flex I have. It's a great machine.
 
Also it runs smoother and is much quieter than the Makita.

I agree it's a very nice for a full size rotary buffer. You can hear the gears grinding when you do a side-by-side test compared to the Flex PE14 but the Makita and the 3M do this also but that's because they are made using a Global Manufacturing Process which means these buffers are made to,
  • Steel grinding, sanding and cutting
  • Concrete grinding and cutting
  • Polishing paint
The Global Manufacturing Process is a one-size fits all approach so that one tool design can be marketed into multiple industries.


I have a very good interview thread with Bob Eichelberg here,



Rotary Buffer Talk with Bob Eichelberg from Flex Tools


Bob Eichelberg, the President of Flex Power Tools North America, stopped by Autogeek today for a meeting and after his meeting I asked him if he had some time to talk shop about rotary buffers and he politely said "yes"

Yesterday I had all the rotary buffers out to show comparative size for this thread...

RotaryBuffersSizes02.jpg


So while all the rotary buffers were still out we spent some time talking about some of the differences between Flex power tools and the others you see on the work bench.

mikeandBobrbs01.jpg


mikeandBobrbs02.jpg



One of the things we did was one-by-one, turn each rotary buffer on, set the RPM to the lowest setting and then listen to each one as it was running.

Bob pointed out the lack of grinding noise with the Flex PE14, so I asked him why the difference?

He said the noise comes from the gears as they mesh together while the tool is running. The gears used in Flex power tools, (all their tools), are each hand ground by machine and then heat treated to strict tolerances. These extra steps,
  • Reduce noise so the tool runs quieter
  • Reduce wear-n-tear for increased working life

He also pointed out that Flex Polishers are designed and engineered specifically for automotive paint polishing instead of using a Global Manufacturing Process, which means the tools are designed for multiple applications, such as,
  • Steel grinding, sanding and cutting
  • Concrete grinding and cutting
  • Polishing paint
The Global Manufacturing Process is a one-size fits all approach so that one tool design can be marketed into multiple industries.


Bob said this is key difference that separates Flex Power Tools from others plus all Flex power tools are designed and manufactured in Germany with a 90 year reputation of German engineering quality.

I also asked him about using the PE14 in the same manner that a person would use a full-size rotary buffer, that is with a full size wool pad doing heavy cutting all day long and he said "yes".


Thought I would share our shop talk from today with all my forum friends and to be fair and balanced, anytime a representative, or even the President of any of the other companies for the tools we carry wants to stop by and talk shop the door is always open.



The BIG picture is to get the right tool for you and your needs. Don't limit yourself to just a single machine polisher either, all the Pros I've know have more than one tool and can pick and choose the right tool for the job.


:dblthumb2:
 
Makita 9227C vs DeWALT DWP849X
A better comparison would be to compare the Makita 9227C with the DeWALT DWP849X as they are much more similar and my guess is that DeWALT introduced this new model to compete against the Makita rotary buffer. Both of these buffers, the Makita or the DeWALT would be great choices. I've always been a fan of Makita rotary buffers if for no other reason because I used one for years until it finally wore out having purchased it new in 1988.


The best of both worlds
In a perfect world a person would have at least two rotary buffers, a full size working dog for doing all of the grunt work and a compact, light-weight rotary buffer for when you need to do surgical precision work. This way you can use the one that best fits the job at hand.


The compact size and low weight of the Flex PE14 plus the 600 RPM range are the features I'm most attracted to. It's light weight and small size make it really easy to control when doing intricate work. Perhaps we'll see the introduction of other compact, lightweight rotary buffers into the future.

After the compounding the upper half of the 1949 Sedan Delivery, I just switched over to the Flex PE14 due to the light weight and compact size features. I could have used either for the rest of the job by my preference was for the easiest tool to work with as this streetrod has a lot of real-estate to buff.


Here's some pictures to show relative sizes...

The two Flex rotary buffers on the left are in the Compact category while the other 4 rotary buffers are in the Full Size category. Comparing the compacts with the full size rotary buffers can be done but it trends towards the comparing applies to oranges analogy as in person and in use you can tell right away when you switch from a full size to a compact or visa-versa.
RotaryBuffersSizes01.jpg



RotaryBuffersSizes02.jpg



The new DeWALT DWP849X is wider and more bulky like the other full size rotary buffers in these pictures.
RotaryBuffersSizes03.jpg



You can that the Flex is more narrow from top to bottom...
RotaryBuffersSizes04.jpg



RotaryBuffersSizes05.jpg


RotaryBuffersSizes06.jpg





One of these days I'll see if I can have my trusty, dusty Makita rebuilt, I buffed out a lot of cars before I wore the side of the sandcast head smooth with my hand...


600_mediumshotafter15yearsofbuffing.jpg


600_closeupafter15yearsofbuffing.jpg




:buffing: :buffing: :buffing: :buffing: :buffing:
 
Thanks for sharing the reviews Mike. I just received the Dewalt. It wasn't a hard decision because i had a few power tools from both companies. I Don't trust the Makita because a couple of the Makita batteries die prematurely while the Dewalts i got 5 years ago still going strong.
 
The one thing that has always made me lean toward Makita's 9227c is the slow start function. Not sure if this new DeWalt model has it or not but I'm very tempted to try it out regardless. I love the rubber bump guards all around it. I'm always very paranoid about the clearances of spoilers and air dams vs the height of my Makita because there is no going back from one bad contact between the paint and one of the metal tool stand posts on the head.

I always thought DeWalt made a better overall machine for its rugged durability and power, but purchased a Makita due to being a little quieter, pad rotation seemed smoother (to me) and the slow start prevents me from accidentally hitting the paint at full speed with an unprimed pad or bumping the trigger too soon and damaging the car or the buffer itself.

Mike did you ever experience weak points in your Makita's power cord, especially near the handle? I've had to rewire mine twice in the past five years, and the paint shop I worked at was always having to keep spare cords on the shelf for the few we used there. If I had to name one real issue with that brand buffer, the power cord would be it.
 
Mike did you ever experience weak points in your Makita's power cord, especially near the handle?


I probably replaced the power cord a half a dozen times, each time wiring in a 25' extension cord for functionality.


My old Makita is sitting on a book shelf next to me here at the office, I'll see about getting it rebuilt as long as it retains the worn aluminum head. Had to buff out a lot of cars to wear it down to where it's at today.


:)
 
I would make a collage of pictures you might have of you putting it to work and use that as a background to mount it on the wall. If it can't keep the worn head, make her a trophy. :) Just a thought.
 
Back
Top