szjalo
New member
- Sep 19, 2011
- 138
- 0
plz correct me if I am wrong here, but my understanding:
#501: more cut, great durability(supposed to be 1 yr?), great look
#105: less cut, same durability(claimed to be 1yr?), same look
I am sure both are awesome products. I just don't quite understand why lots of ppl use them as a combo, top 501 with 105.
I can understand 501 should be a great AIO and be applied first. Then why 105? I mean, 105 is still an abrasive AIO. I assume it will still remove certain amount of 501 if not all. So it actually harms the durability of 501? If so why many ppl use 105 as a following procedure instead of using some non-abrasive sealant. I am sure that are few sealants there providing the great look and at least claiming they last like 1 year. Would 501/ other-non-abrasive sealant provides a better choice than the current 501/105?
Thanks in advance!
#501: more cut, great durability(supposed to be 1 yr?), great look
#105: less cut, same durability(claimed to be 1yr?), same look
I am sure both are awesome products. I just don't quite understand why lots of ppl use them as a combo, top 501 with 105.
I can understand 501 should be a great AIO and be applied first. Then why 105? I mean, 105 is still an abrasive AIO. I assume it will still remove certain amount of 501 if not all. So it actually harms the durability of 501? If so why many ppl use 105 as a following procedure instead of using some non-abrasive sealant. I am sure that are few sealants there providing the great look and at least claiming they last like 1 year. Would 501/ other-non-abrasive sealant provides a better choice than the current 501/105?
Thanks in advance!