rms64 New member Joined Dec 18, 2012 Messages 1,122 Reaction score 0 Jan 15, 2014 #21 So, I'm guessing that based on the low-speed limitation, the lightweight would not be the best choice for jeweling?
So, I'm guessing that based on the low-speed limitation, the lightweight would not be the best choice for jeweling?
Rsurfer Well-known member Joined Jan 26, 2007 Messages 14,161 Reaction score 26 Jan 15, 2014 #22 rms64 said: So, I'm guessing that based on the low-speed limitation, the lightweight would not be the best choice for jeweling? Click to expand... If I remember correctly, 3M Ultrafina recommends 1800 rpms. You would think a manufacture as big as 3M has done their homework.
rms64 said: So, I'm guessing that based on the low-speed limitation, the lightweight would not be the best choice for jeweling? Click to expand... If I remember correctly, 3M Ultrafina recommends 1800 rpms. You would think a manufacture as big as 3M has done their homework.
rms64 New member Joined Dec 18, 2012 Messages 1,122 Reaction score 0 Jan 15, 2014 #23 Rsurfer said: If I remember correctly, 3M Ultrafina recommends 1800 rpms. You would think a manufacture as big as 3M has done their homework. Click to expand... Interesting, thank you. For some reason I thought that a lower rpm - like 600 ish - was ideal for jeweling. I could definitely be wrong on that and will research further. :xyxthumbs:
Rsurfer said: If I remember correctly, 3M Ultrafina recommends 1800 rpms. You would think a manufacture as big as 3M has done their homework. Click to expand... Interesting, thank you. For some reason I thought that a lower rpm - like 600 ish - was ideal for jeweling. I could definitely be wrong on that and will research further. :xyxthumbs: