Eldorado2k
Well-known member
- Nov 9, 2015
- 14,545
- 645
The family I work for has owned the business for 41 years now. With that, you certainly have a "we've been doing this for 40 years" type of mentality. Of course, those 40+ years of experience are well worth having, I guess you don't last that long if you are not doing things right. But, that also brings an our-way-or-the-highway type of attitude, one that can be extremely frustrating to work around.
On one occasion, a new employee was told she was welcome to try new things, that as a business they could benefit from new or fresh ideas. The result ended up being things done differently, but "not how we always do things". So which is it then? Fresh blood and fresh ideas, or do as we say because that's how we always do it.
I'm the sort of person who likes to find different ways to do things, mainly from an efficiency point of view. If I find a way of working that is more efficient and deliveries the same or superior results, then doesn't that make me more productive as an employee? As an employer, why would you waste energy trying to suppress that. In this sort of working environment, I have found the line to be extremely thin when it comes to showing initiative and being unmotivated or lazy. Frankly, sometimes an employer only ever sees their employees as a liability, that they see things from one angle rather than the bigger picture.
Reading your reply and seeing my 2 previous posts put together like that makes me wonder if what I posted might possibly be misunderstood. Just to clarify, the 1st post was completely hypothetical and in no way was I comparing my real life experience with Bemiss to that. My description of working with him was just me saying that I was willing to put my personal practices aside out of respect for the man who I was working for.
I know sometimes certain thing can be misunderstood over text and wanted to clarify that just in case.
