A few months ago i got a ticket in CA. I live in NV and was traviling home from CA when i got pulled over. I ended up getting a ticket for my tail lights being tinted. Now when i tinted my tail lights i used a paint that is very transparent. CA is very strict with tail light laws but NV doesnt really care. The law in NV states that a break light must be visible from 300 feet which mine are. Heres the kicker though. When i got the ticket i wasnt even driving. On top of that the CHP wrote the ticket for the wrong violation. Its now a ticket for $658.83 which i think is ridiculous. CA deficit isnt my problem so to charge such an outrageous amount is extortion IMO. So im going to plea not guilty by trial of written declaration. For those who have experience do you think i have grounds to plea not guilty?
Heres some facts as stated above for those who read this quickly. Got ticket for tail lights, i wasnt the one driving although i was in the car, lights are compliant in the state in which i live, cop wrote the wrong violation on the ticket. The violation he wrote down pertains to interior lights altered to impersonate a police officer or something to that effect.
What do you guys think?