I question how so many bag on the durability of NXT but conveniently ignore that quality with Pinnacle Souveran? Now, in all fairness I haven't tried Souveran and it's been 1.5-2 years since I've used NXT, but my information tells me that 1. Neither last. 2. Pinnacle is expensive, NXT is cheap. 3. Pinnacle looks superb. NXT? Well it doesn't look like ass now does it? I would be surprised if Pinnacle doesn't look noticeably better side by side but for for 8X the price it should. If it lasts a week or two longer than NXT, then for 8X the price it should. If it goes on and comes off twice as easy, yeah, for 8X the price it should. If it smells 3X as good, you guessed what I'm going to say next, for 8X the price it should. Now I don't recall NXT being hard to use, I don't recall it smelling like ass and I don't recall it looking like ass. I can take a few guesses at the answers I'm going to get, but I'd like to hear them nonetheless. How come one is judged so harshly, when the other is forgiven of the same shortcomings, has another shortcoming altogether, and is only seen for its virtues? I guess the Pinnacle is the high maintenance girlfriend who rates at 9.5 in looks, beauty trumps all. And the NXT is the high maintenance girlfriend, with less expensive tastes, who rates a 7 to 7.5 in looks, whose similar flaws are never overlooked.
Sorry for the thread hijack, I just wanted to get that off my chest.