Thanks Mike. Is it worth the extra bucks rather than using 3M paper?
In my opinion and experience the answer is "yes".
Paint is thin, you don't have much to work with. The Unigrit technology used to make the Nikken "finishing" papers, (not sanding papers), removes paint more evenly and leaves a scratch pattern that is more equal in depth. This means you will remove the sanding mark pattern faster, with less heat generated and leave more paint on the car.
I wouldn't hand sand a car again unless I had to since now days we have sanding discs for machine sanding.
If I HAD to hand sand for some reason my first choice would be Nikken Finishing Papers. I hand sanded before sanding discs were invented.... been there, done that.
The below is an excerpt from this thread, note the year is 1999. This is where I first met Chip Foose and worked on his car 0032 and also met Christopher Titus and then hung out all weekend with these guys. That was a blast.
Scrape, Terry Cook, Chip Foose, Christoper Titus and the Titanic
A few months later Terry Cook brought me to Southern California to buff out and prepare Scrape for the Monterey Auction where Scrape sold at the Monterey Auction in
1999 for a record.$275,000
While I was down there, I also did the wetsand, cut and buffed on one of Terry's other creations, The Titanic.
Hand Sanding the Liberace Lavender Paint on the Titanic
When I arrived in Monterey, they had the Titanic set-up in the 3rd floor of a 4 floor parking garage and all I had for lighting were the overhead florescent tubes. Not what you would call an optimum setting for wetsanding a car that's 20 feet long with case-hardened clear coat paint.
See the circle on the front fender? This is called a
TEST SPOT in
1999.
Back then we didn't have all the cool tools we have now for machine sanding nor the abrasive technology now available in aggressive cutting compounds. It's sure a lot easier to sand down paint and buff it out then it was back then.
Test Spot - The story behind the story...
