If You Could Only Have One .....

Looks like the 3401 is getting the most love minus a few haters here and there.:righton:
 
Looks like the 3401 is getting the most love minus a few haters here and there.:righton:

Not hating it, I'm just picking the one that's more flexible for different situations. Kinda hard to polish an A pillar with a 5.5" or 6.5" pad without making a mess. Same with all of the other small areas such as the top of bumpers.
 
Not hating it, I'm just picking the one that's more flexible for different situations. Kinda hard to polish an A pillar with a 5.5" or 6.5" pad without making a mess. Same with all of the other small areas such as the top of bumpers.

Those are some very good points.
 
I might have gone with the PCXP had it been able to effectively correct the paint on my truck. I don't know, but I believe GM coated my truck with liquid rocks or something. It took 2 sometimes 3 passes with the DA MF system to get the same results I got with just one pass using the 3401 and hydrotech pads. That's how I know that there some corrections that are out of the PCXP's reach. It's versatility puts it at a close 2nd behind the 3401 but the 3401 has yet to fail me.
 
If I could only have one, that is easy: Flex 3401. Most versatile polisher I have, no worries about how it will finish out or holograms. I can also apply and remove LSPs with it.

I own a PC, Flex 3401, and Flex PE14 Rotary.

I agree!

Flex 3401 for all those reasons plus how smooth the operation is as opposed to feeling like your D/A is a jackhammer.

I've used the griots 6" griots, 3" griots, flex 3401, and Flex rotary (the new one). I have not used my rotary for more than a few hours so far.


Flex 3401 as long as I dont need a 4 in pad.....

Kinda hard to polish an A pillar with a 5.5" or 6.5" pad without making a mess. Same with all of the other small areas such as the top of bumpers.

I recommend modifying a regular backing plate to create a 3 7/8" backing plate. It works great with a 4" pad for small areas!!

Show everyone your 1-off backing plate :Picture:

You got it Richard!

My buddy had this made for me!

IMG_5929.jpg


IMG_5930.jpg
 
Even with that fancy dancy backing plate the PC will still get in tighter areas ;) Well maybe if you remove the handle from the flex it would help.
 
Even with that fancy dancy backing plate the PC will still get in tighter areas ;) Well maybe if you remove the handle from the flex it would help.

Yes, and the PC will continue to vibrate while my Flex will continue to make me smile :). ;)
 
Yes, and the PC will continue to vibrate while my Flex will continue to make me smile :). ;)

Yes the Flex is a bit smoother but its not that big of a difference. Makes me wonder if something was wrong with your PC? Did you have the counter weight on it?
 
Yes the Flex is a bit smoother but its not that big of a difference. Makes me wonder if something was wrong with your PC? Did you have the counter weight on it?

Never used the PC but I know from others including you that it vibrates more than the Flex.

The griots I used vibrated much, much, much more than a Flex. There isn't even a comparison.
 
Hmm I can send you mine so you can try it out. Until then stop arguing with me :D
 
Eeny, meeny, miny, moe.....I just cannot decide.. :laughing:

Collection_RD18.jpg



The Flex 3401 is quite a machine. I has everything going for it except for size, sometimes it's a bit too large so I grab my Porter Cable 7424. My Makita 9227 set up for larger pads while the Flex PE14-2-150 is setup for smaller pads for those tight spots..
 
I have the GG with the Megs DA MF System , 3" GG DA and Flex 3401. I use LC HT on the Flex. Only 1 would take the Flex. But the GG MF combo cuts quicker IMO.
 
I would go with a DA (not my Flex) if I had to have ONE.
 
I agree!

Flex 3401 for all those reasons plus how smooth the operation is as opposed to feeling like your D/A is a jackhammer.

I've used the griots 6" griots, 3" griots, flex 3401, and Flex rotary (the new one). I have not used my rotary for more than a few hours so far.






I recommend modifying a regular backing plate to create a 3 7/8" backing plate. It works great with a 4" pad for small areas!!



You got it Richard!

My buddy had this made for me!

IMG_5929.jpg


IMG_5930.jpg

How were you able to get it so small? Which bp did you start with?
 
id take my makita. Did you guys see the thread of rasky doing that impala? if you all read closely. IT WAS ALL DONE WITH A ROTARY!! I just love rotarys. Who cares if you cant apply a wax with it, you still have your hand and an applicator pad. :xyxthumbs:
 
Looks like the 3401 is getting the most love minus a few haters here and there.:righton:
Making logical statements about a machine is not hating.
Yes, and the PC will continue to vibrate while my Flex will continue to make me smile :). ;)
You have little girly arms, so I can see how the additional vibration might bother you...LMFAO j/k Dog
id take my makita. Did you guys see the thread of rasky doing that impala? if you all read closely. IT WAS ALL DONE WITH A ROTARY!! I just love rotarys. Who cares if you cant apply a wax with it, you still have your hand and an applicator pad. :xyxthumbs:
You can't finish every type of paint with a rotary, you can't glaze, paint cleaner, wax, or seal with it either. It is the LEAST versatile tool that is listed here.
 
You can't finish every type of paint with a rotary, you can't glaze, paint cleaner, wax, or seal with it either. It is the LEAST versatile tool that is listed here.

It's also the most powerful of the bunch and has the most potential for producing the best finish.
 
It's also the most powerful of the bunch and has the most potential for producing the best finish.
There are VERY few paint finishes that cannot be totally corrected with a DA and modern pad technology. so again, if you could only have ONE tool a rotary would be the least useful since all it can do is cut and sometimes finish.
 
Back
Top