Angus
New member
- Jun 14, 2012
- 1,583
- 0
Cool video. What kind of car is that?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks, it's a BMW 335i.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cool video. What kind of car is that?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hey mike In the picture of the Camaro that you corrected, the one picture of the hood where it shows the compound buffing circles.
I was always told to work it small sections whenever compound, polishing, or waxing but obviously this wasn't the case with this vehicle that you did from viewing the photo.
So have I been wasting extra time by doing smaller sections for no reason ?
Sent from my iPhone using AGOnline
Mike Phillips said:This is the Jescar Micro Finishing Polish - it's almost translucent and wipes off effortlessly as does the compound.
![]()
Boom! There it is. Final results after compounding and polishing. The paint is as close to flawless and this guy chooses to get it considering it's a daily driver but it looks dang good.
![]()
This Camaro is now ready for wax and that is the next step I did to the paint sealing in the results created by the new Jescar Correcting Compound and Micro Finishing Polish.
Mike Phillips said:Because the Flex 3401 is a gear-driven, forced rotation polisher it offers a lot of power and for this reason I'm able to buff out this large section at one time.
![]()
I think the Jescar polish is on par with the Menzerna Super Finish 3800
Here's the deal... even if it did squeeze out a little more shine, applying a wax or sealant or even coating would create a uniform appearance that would negate any difference.
When polishing paint, the application of a wax or sealant is the great equalizer. That is, applying a wax or sealant will tend to diminish any gained increase of one polish over the other.
I should write an article on this topic. (the great equalizer)
I did when I tested it on my black paint panel and it passed with flying colors. For a chemical stripper I used what was closest to my hand and that was the Gyeon Prep.
My preferred chemical stripper for compounds and polish is simple de-odorized mineral spirits.
I would never lay claim to the title expert about anything, in fact I've probably typed over a hundred times on this forum that I'm a
Perpetual Student
New technology is being introduced so fast that they only way to keep up is to have an open mind and be learning all the time.
And if you don't have a compound/polish tag team then give them a try. I guarantee they will not let you down.
I was impressed not only with the performance of the product but the simplicity of the line, that is two products, not 20, there's a compound and a polish. Pretty easy to figure out what to use and the order to use them.
![]()
So does that mean that the jescar finishes like a jeweling polish or there is no need for a jeweling polish at all?
What if you used menzerna 3500? Would there be no benefit to using 3800 afterwards to "jewel" the paint because the wax will negate any benefit?
If that's the case I'd say a lot of people including me are wasting their time jeweling? I'll skip it next time I detail my car.
Doing 7-8 passes per section takes me a long time
Great questions but the answers are,
What you need for a follow-up polish depends on what you used initially, the pad and the results.
If you use a wool pad on a rotary and a great compound you still might need a medium cut polish with an orbital and a foam pad to remove the holograms from just the wool pad fibers.
If you cut with a foam cutting pad and a great compound on an orbital an ultra fine polish or jeweling polish might be enough to remove any haze (seen or unseen).
These are deep questions... there good questions but lots of factors not to mention your goals.
I would say that by the time you apply a wax, a sealant or a coating, the difference created by a medium cut or fine cut polish as compared to following either of these two categories of product with a THIRD step using your reference of a JEWELING polish which would be an ULTRA FINE CUT polish would be negligible as an LSP is the great equalizer when it comes to final end results.
Make sense?
Man I can go as deep as anyone and usually deeper....
![]()
Yeah definitely makes sense,
Do you think that menzerna 3800 on a red waxing pad would have enough bite to follow menzerna 2500 on a black finishing pad? I'm talking the force flex colors.
Either way there would be negligible benefit to using 3800 on a waxing pad after using jescar finishing polish on a finishing pad.
Even if the 3800 squeezes more gloss out of the panel the wax/sealant/coating would equalize the gloss on the final finish.
You can only see so much reflection through a layer of wax?
Good stuff thanks for the valuable information Mike Phillips, always enjoy reading theses articles on my slow days/Off days!
Hey so are you racing any sharks in the near future? Lol just joking...