M105/M205 results. would like opinions/comments

BarryK

New member
Joined
Jan 31, 2009
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
Hi I'm new on here. I've been lurking for some weeks now, reading a lot and trying to learn as much as possible.

Wanted to post on a detail job I just did on one of my collector cars.

I've been waiting to try the M105/M205 on my 1965 Corvette for a number of weeks. Had some nice weather the other day so was finally able to get started.

First, a brief history - the car was completely repainted back in 2005 with basecoat/clearcoat. The painter is very good but one thing that just wasn't done to my satisfaction was some of the wetsanding and buffing - he left a fair amount of orange peel so it went back for him to do it again. Than the car went back to him again last March (a year ago) for a minor repair on a fender at which time he again did a complete re-do of the wetsanding and buffing to get rid of a little bit more orange peel and paint shrinkage that occured (common of vettes because of the way paint cures over time on the fiberglass). It's been sitting in the paint/bodyshop for 11 months until I just got it back a few weeks ago. There were still also a few places that he seemed to have missed with the buffer after this last wetsanding.
Besides having to do a basic heavy cleaning (been 2 years since she was washed and she spent the last 11 months in the body/paint shop collecting dust EVERYWHERE on her) there the remaining wetsanding marks and a LOT of swirls and holograms.

Here are some "Before" pics: (sorry, I'm new to trying to take pics of a car's paint finish so these didn't come out great)

DSCF0170.jpg

DSCF0171.jpg

DSCF0172.jpg

DSCF0173.jpg

DSCF0174.jpg

DSCF0175.jpg

DSCF0176.jpg


I wanted to finally try out the M105 so I picked the worst spot on the car, an area on the passenger side door window frame where it looks like he missed completely with the buffer after wetsanding.
Considering I have the Flex 3401 but I haven't had it long so I wasn't too comfortable machine compounding my baby with such an aggressive cut product so I figure I'd try it by hand first to see what results i got.
Using a terry cloth application pad I used the M105 on the problem area of the door. Working it in well with what i'd call medium pressure on the pad. Worked it by hand for about a full minute than simply wiped it off with a fresh clean MF cloth. I was shocked! Even by hand and working the M105 for such a relatively short time it came out looking great - all the sanding marks gone and basically looking ready to put final wax on. I went back over it anyway with the M205 and it just really made it pop.

With my success with the same area on the door I proceeded on more of the car and did about 1/2 the hood with the M105 by hand. After the first half of the hood with the M105 the results were pretty much the same as the first test area with just a few small areas I had to go back and hit again but than the result was a great finish basically ready for final waxing. The M105 really does finish down excellent although I still went back over it with the M205 and it just made it "pop" some more but I can easily see skipping the M205 step and going directly from M105 to wax or sealant.

After seeing how easily the M105 was working on the car I got brave and decided to try the Flex on the car. Having never used the Flex on the car before and never having used the Flex with the M105 yet I was cautious and went with what I figured would be a very mild pad for a compound - a Country Lake 6.5" Grey.
I started with spraying the pad with a few sprays of the XMY pad conditioner than putting the M105 on the pad and handspreading it around than finished covering the working area on a speed of one than increased the Flex speed to 5. Only worked the area for about one or one and a half minutes with medium pressure on the Flex than went over the area again using only the weight of the Flex itself, than than wiped it off with a MF towel. WOW!!! Looked better than it ever did - all the swirls, sanding marks, hazing, etc gone and just glossy and gleaming as you would want. Again, the results straight from M105 looked great enough to go right to wax but I wanted to use the M205 so...
I than switched to the Country Lake 6.5" Blue pad and went over the area with the M205. Yep, made it just pop and shine a bit more but again I can see than if I wasn't REALLY motivated to get as good of a finish as possible the M205 step could easily be skipped, it really looks that good straight from M105.

I now have about 80% of the car done and the difference of before and after using the M105/M205 combo is night and day.
This is my first time using the M105 and M205 AND only my second time using the Flex (actually any buffer) and I'm really impressed. Very easy to use, the M105 works really fast but also works as easy or as hard as you need or want it to work. Removes wetsanding marks when you need and than also with lighter pressure and shorter working time gets rid of swirls, hazing, etc.

Some 'AFTER" pics:

DSCF0167.jpg

DSCF0169.jpg

DSCF0183.jpg

DSCF0184.jpg

DSCF0185.jpg

DSCF0186.jpg

DSCF0187.jpg

DSCF0193.jpg

DSCF0197.jpg

DSCF0198.jpg


Anyway, any opinions or comments on the job on the Vette? i'm VERY open to ideas, suggestions, whatever on what I may have done to improve things even more, whether it would be possible better results (although personally I think it looks pretty good), a better working method, shortcuts, or whatever.

I know I have a LOT to learn yet so any critisism or suggestions are welcome.

OH... I also have another question.
Today or tomorrow when I finish up with the remaining areas of the car to M105/M205 should I bother with going with #7 Show Car Glaze? Than, am I better off with the #26 yellow wax or the #21 Synthetic Sealant 2.0 or is is any advantage to using 26 on top of #21?
I have the products and I'm looking for the best possible look and finish since the car has to be at an indoor show in a couple weeks and with the indoor lighting I want it to look it's best.
 
Last edited:
Nice work! The show car glaze couldn't hurt. You could try a sample panel, half with the glaze and wax, the other half with just the wax. See if you see a difference. #26 is the hi-tech wax right? It has polymers and carnuba. You can use it by itself, apply 2 coats 12 hours apart.
 
thanks loudog1. :)
really the first time using a buffer (my new Flex) and first time with M105/M205 so I was very pleased how well it seemed to come out, especially without having any learning curve behind me.
I have no doubts at all someone more experienced would have gotten it even better but all things considered I'm pretty pleased.

I guess you are right, I'll just have to experiment to see if there will be any benefit to using the #7 glaze or not to bother.

Yes, the #26 is the Hi Tech yellow wax.

Basically I have the #26 wax, #21 Sealant, and I also have the NXT wax but it's the first version, not the newer 2.0 and I was never real happy with the results the few times I tried to use it - I could understand why they reformulated it to the 2.0 version. I'm just trying to figure out which would be my best options to use or combination to use as a final step product.
The car is mostly a show car and only gets driven a minimum amount - usually less than 500 miles a summer so overall durability or long lasting isn't as important as "looks" as I can always put another coat of whatever product on at any time. When it's not being used the car just sits in the garage under a soft car cover. Usually All I need to do is lightly wipe it down with a California brush and give it a quick detail spray to get any dust off it and that's the extent of it's normal cleaning required. An actual wet washing is very rare unless I get caught out in the rain during a drive.
 
So the durability of a sealant is not really needed. I would just stick with the #26. Maybe re-apply a coat evey 3-4 weeks. You might want to look into a paint cleanser. It has the oils to shine up the paint before was application. it also will remove the old wax, so you will have a nice new coat each time.

Be careful with the california duster. A nice lubricating QD and some good microfiber towels might be safer.
 
yeah, you are probably right regarding not really needing the sealant. I'll stick with the #26 and experiment with the #7 glaze to see if it makes any difference.

I've heard concerns from others also about using the California duster. I figured it was better it try to get excess dust off before using a QD spray with the MF towels so that even with the QD spray I wasn't rubbing dust into the finish but maybe I was wrong in that assumption. I suppose that could be where a lot of my swirls came from since it wouldn't really be from washing the car since like I said, an actual wash is very rare on this car.

now that I've removed probably 98% of the swirls using the M105/M205 I should probably try just keeping the dust off with the QD and not use the California brush and see if that helps keeps the swirls away better.
 
megs 105 and 205 are the best polishes megs offers. I personally hate #83 DACP, dusts like crazy and takes forever.
 
yeah, you are probably right regarding not really needing the sealant. I'll stick with the #26 and experiment with the #7 glaze to see if it makes any difference.

I've heard concerns from others also about using the California duster. I figured it was better it try to get excess dust off before using a QD spray with the MF towels so that even with the QD spray I wasn't rubbing dust into the finish but maybe I was wrong in that assumption. I suppose that could be where a lot of my swirls came from since it wouldn't really be from washing the car since like I said, an actual wash is very rare on this car.

now that I've removed probably 98% of the swirls using the M105/M205 I should probably try just keeping the dust off with the QD and not use the California brush and see if that helps keeps the swirls away better.
A QD sprayed as a fine mist attaches to the dust. Which adds lubrication for removal. the california duster just drags the dust along the paint. Which in turn will cause swirls.
 
Fantastic job! Once you have finished the entire car, I think you should lay down one or two coats of the Synthetic Sealant, and then top it with the #26 Hi-Tech Wax.
 
oh sure Emile, NOW you reply..... LOL
I actually finished the M105/M205 yesterday.
Tried a small area ans tested the #7 Show Car Glaze but honestly couldn't see any difference so decided not to go thru the trouble of the extra step.
Was about to put on the #26 wax when I found I had a bottle of the NXT 2.0 I didn't know I had. Not sure when I got it because after my disappointment with the original version of NXT I don't recall buying the 2.0 version but .... I seem to have it so I gave it a try. Looks nice, feels good.
The paint surface on the car is the smoothest and glossiest it's ever been now.
 
the power of the force is strong with this one. great results for a first timer you obviously did youre research and used some great products to achieve the outcome. well done.
 
not to knock the product, but some should understand there appears to be two versions of M105. One is DA approved, newer, and it appears cuts less. The original is quite abrasive and can be used with rotaries and powders less.

Now back to your regular station ...
 
the power of the force is strong with this one. great results for a first timer you obviously did youre research and used some great products to achieve the outcome. well done.


actually, it's probably simply more "beginners luck" than anything else! :)
 
I see and hear alot of good things about M105 and M205. Here's my question, do 105 and 205 look and feel the same. While at the detail fest, I got a sample from Mike. I didn't see what bottle he got it from.
So I don't know what I have. It's snow white, has very very fine grit feel. I hope he gave me the 205. Please tell me 105 is gray, tan, anything other than white, with a gritty feel.
 
actually, it's probably simply more "beginners luck" than anything else! :)
Luck or not, it still looks great. What did you end up using? Did you use the glaze, sealant and tech-wax?
 
I see and hear alot of good things about M105 and M205. Here's my question, do 105 and 205 look and feel the same. While at the detail fest, I got a sample from Mike. I didn't see what bottle he got it from.
So I don't know what I have. It's snow white, has very very fine grit feel. I hope he gave me the 205. Please tell me 105 is gray, tan, anything other than white, with a gritty feel.
105 is also white .I will open the 205 if you don't get your answer Craig
 
The results look fantastic. I would skip #7 show glaze.
 
Luck or not, it still looks great. What did you end up using? Did you use the glaze, sealant and tech-wax?

I tried the #7 glaze on a small area and honestly didn't see any difference or improvement so just skipped it.
Found I had a bottle of the the newer NXT 2.0 so decided to try that instead of using the #26 wax. I'm pretty happy with how things came out.
Had the car out in the sunshine this afternoon. Saw a couple places that I want to go over again with with the M105 as there were a few scratches that seem to still be in there (must have missed them in the indoor lighting) but they are few. I guess I shouldn't be too surprised I missed a few anyway considering it was my first time and I was using a pretty mild pad (gray with the M105 and blue with the M205).
Still, they are the types of small areas that *I* noticed because I was looking for any flaws but I'd bet 99.9% of anyone else looking at the car, even at a show, wouldn't notice them.
 
I see and hear alot of good things about M105 and M205. Here's my question, do 105 and 205 look and feel the same. While at the detail fest, I got a sample from Mike. I didn't see what bottle he got it from.
So I don't know what I have. It's snow white, has very very fine grit feel. I hope he gave me the 205. Please tell me 105 is gray, tan, anything other than white, with a gritty feel.

both the M105 and M205 are white. Both pretty much look and feel the same.
M105 might have a slightly grittier feel to it but I'd have to specifically go out and test that for you. Just using the products I didn't notice any obvious or significant differences in the feel - of course I wasn't looking for any differences in the feel of it to observe but there wasn't anything that really stood out as different either.
 
205 should not feel gritty at all, so I'm assuming you got 105.

105 will work VERY quickly and disappear into nothing when using a clean pad, 205 has a longer working time and kind of looks oily on the paint.
 
Barry K and Matt, thanks. I just have to try a little and see how it works. Knowing the 205 has a long working time and oily looking, should help me figure out what I have.
 
Back
Top