SON1C
New member
- Apr 4, 2011
- 3,442
- 3
1st Kevin Brown post since 02-23-2012, 02:21 AM
lol live stats! thank you allen
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1st Kevin Brown post since 02-23-2012, 02:21 AM
Longer working time with the compound polishing the paint, minimal dusting, perfect example 105 vs hd cut or even m101 vs hd cut
although thanks to JSou I had the opportunity to work with wolfgang uber for a couple days on several vehicles and that is quite a compound, great cut, finishes well, incredible work time.
Don't mean to start a debate with all of this, just throwing my 2c in.
However I do know you are the 105 king and I lost track of how many times I tried to replicate your method with using m105! While it has great cut and finishes well it is a bear to work with in my opinion thus I have turned to other compounds.
I hope they do so 3d can teach meguiars about working time within compounds
If this is true I will be ordering some gallons before 3m ruins their product line![]()
SMAT vs DAT. You are comparing apples to oranges. Meguiars compounds weren't designed to have diminishing abrasives. Squirt a small amount of water after working the product for more cut and longer working time. Don't see why people have so many problems with meguiars 105....
Does a working time for a compound have to be long for it to remove the defect?
If you really want some work time, add some mineral oil to the compound and spend extra time trying to remove the oily residue. Or, try and make D300 dry up.
What exactly was ruined? We're all curious to know, since there's so much "secret" information in this thread.
Longer working time with the compound polishing the paint, minimal dusting, perfect example 105 vs hd cut or even m101 vs hd cut
although thanks to JSou I had the opportunity to work with wolfgang uber for a couple days on several vehicles and that is quite a compound, great cut, finishes well, incredible work time.
Don't mean to start a debate with all of this, just throwing my 2c in.
However I do know you are the 105 king and I lost track of how many times I tried to replicate your method with using m105! While it has great cut and finishes well it is a bear to work with in my opinion thus I have turned to other compounds.
No sweat, not lookng for trouble... :bat:
Just interested to talk about things like this. Sometimes a simple statement can lead into a really great discussion!
There's so many ways to extend or shorten the length of a buffing cycle. If we're on the same page here, you are basically wanting an increase in the amount of time that one application of a buffing liquid can be used?
In addition, you don't want dust, or you believe that the compound you were using dusted too much?
I heard Megs bought out 3D. Can any1 confirm this?
:xyxthumbs:No sweat, not lookng for trouble... :bat:
Just interested to talk about things like this. Sometimes a simple statement can lead into a really great discussion!
There's so many ways to extend or shorten the length of a buffing cycle. If we're on the same page here, you are basically wanting an increase in the amount of time that one application of a buffing liquid can be used?
In addition, you don't want dust, or you believe that the compound you were using dusted too much?