Meguiars M21 2.0 vs Wolfgang DGPS 3.0

AeroCleanse

New member
Joined
Nov 17, 2008
Messages
2,422
Reaction score
0
As the title says it all, which one is the best? I'm trying to decided between them, money aside.
 
I think M21 2.0 looks superb, and it's way more economical. That being said, I've never tried Wolfgang.
 
I think M21 2.0 looks superb, and it's way more economical. That being said, I've never tried Wolfgang.
Read the OP again. Money is not an issue and you should try wg3.0.
 
I've tried both and I will bet that if you bought both, and had a friend do one side of the hood with WG and the other side with Megs while you were away - you wouldn't be able to tell the difference, except in the wallet. FWIW - I'm not a big fan of Megs stuff, but I do think 21 2.0 is really good.
 
I like the look of M21 a little more but the slick feel of DGPS is awesome!

I have both and will continue to use both. :cheers:
 
I haven't tried M21, but just reordered Wolfgang DGPS along with Fuzion. I really love the DGPS, the deep, wet look along with the slickness. I am relly looking forward to using the Fuzion.
 
WG DGPS is one of my favs.....even prefer it to SN (v2) and Fuzion.
 
If money isnt a thing buy them both do your own evaluation to see which one works best for you.
 
i own both and i have to say. dgps 3.0 is hands down the better of the two
 
Dragging this up, but I have a similar question. Now to me, I think they are different products as the description of M21 says it has fillers. Does DGPS have fillers as well?? If so, i would think that M21 might look bettter on neglected finish and WGPS might look better on a perfect finish?

Im trying to find a nice sealant for production details, DGPS seems to be out of the pricerange, but a little goes a long way, and the M21 seems nice since it will help the finish a little more after a single stage polish on the car. Opinions?
 
...Im trying to find a nice sealant for production details, DGPS seems to be out of the pricerange, but a little goes a long way, and the M21 seems nice since it will help the finish a little more after a single stage polish on the car. Opinions?
I would think that the cheaper product would make more sense for a production environment. No sense spending more money on something that your customers would not appreciate. Of course, if your customers can really tell the difference, and value that visual difference enough to justify paying you more money for the more expensive product, then go ahead and use the more expensive product. But, my guess is that the customers that do not see value in a multi-stage polish are also the same customers that wouldn't really see any value in the better looking product.
 
I would think that the cheaper product would make more sense for a production environment. No sense spending more money on something that your customers would not appreciate. Of course, if your customers can really tell the difference, and would really see enough value in that to pay you more money for the more expensive product, then go ahead and use the more expensive product. But, my guess is that the customers that do not see value in a multi-stage polish are also the same customers that wouldn't really see any value in the better looking product.

:iagree: 110%
 
Back
Top