hernandez.art13
New member
- Apr 8, 2013
- 6,958
- 0
Just use an old 3000 

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just use an old 3000![]()
Actually this is a moot conversation. Technological advances in wet sanding will soon render harsh abrasives and pads obsolete. I am a firm believer in the 3M 3000-5000 Trizact system. Soon 6000 grit papers will be available.
I will always use a polish after compounding so I am most interested in the compounding ability. I should probably give M100 a try. I've been using FG400 and really have no complaints, but like most people I was looking to save a little money.If my knowledge serves me right, the compounding step is to remove paint defects, and the polish is just to refine hazing from the compounding step.
Agreed that M105 dusts a lot more. Here's a very in-depth comparison that's pretty awesome...
In the video, they still used a rotary, but after the 3000 and the 6000, a Rupes or a Flex would finish down almost LSP ready with a medium cut pad and FG400. I know, I did it this past weekend.
You can check my post on my wife's Toyota Camry. I sanded with 3,000 followed by 5,000 and then took the Rupes 15 with the yellow Rupes pad with FG400. Finished out very nice. I then took SOnax 4/6 and polished the vehicle. You can see the results in the thread. I did all of this in around 8.5 to 9 hours. If I would have conventionally compounded the vehicle and then tried to polish I would not have gotten it done in the time I had.
HUMP
I want to learn
The price may inhibit that....List price for the 6" 5000 grit is $100 for a box of 15 Almost $7 per I have heard 4 panels per pad, so an SUV would take 3
Did you dona test spot to see if you could skip the compounding after 5000 and go straight to polish?
I wonder if you could have saved a bunch if time.
If you are going to compound w FG400, the 3000 grit sanding marks would not have been an issue.
I think the value of the 5000 & 6000 grit papers is realized only if they allow you to go straight to polish
I used a polishing pad with the FG 400 to get the initial cut but also to allow it to finish down. The point is not necessarily to go faster, but to create controlled chaos with the imperfections in the paint. The sanding does this. It was however faster than doing a standard hard compound and cut then refining that part and much safer. This is after 5000 and doing the polishing with the Rupes Yellow and FG400. You be the judge.
HUMP
$100 for 15 ?????
Shop around a little bit :dblthumb2:
I quoted the "list price" I think they are $89 on AGO right now How many 5000 grit would you use on a typical sedan?
5000 lasts longer than 3000, much less clogging of the paper with slurry. I would guess 3-4 disks.
Your work looks great! I have no doubt that finish sanding is fantastic and can play a role in some paint corrections. I have been taught machine sanding with 1500 & 3000 grit down at Meguiar's. I just question the economics for the average detailer. If the time savings offsets the additional product costs of 3000/5000 versus compounding
For round numbers, let's call it $5 per sanding pad
3000 grit 4-5 discs = $20-$25
5000 grit 3-4 discs = $15-$20
So for a detailer who's earning target is $40 per hour; the discs need to save him at least an hour to break even. Assuming they have every hour of the week booked solid.
I can't imagine going straight to polishing without re-washing a car after damp sanding, so factor that in as well.
You can buy a lot if compound for $45
I think the 5000/6000 grit papers will find their place, but I don't believe it will be with detailers who are doing anything less than Concours level work.
All that being said...I look forward to playing with them!