Menzerna, names and labels.... :D :)

I do like the smaller bottles so you can try something without committing to 32oz. The 16oz is just not cost effective.
 
If the formulations have not changed, I wonder why some of the cut, gloss, and grit removal numbers have? For example, FG 400 was a cut of 9, gloss of 7, and grit removal of 1200. HCC 400 is cut of 8, gloss of 8, grit removal 1500.

Not that it is a big deal, but curious nonetheless.
 
Dan K said:
If the formulations have not changed, I wonder why some of the cut, gloss, and grit removal numbers have? For example, FG 400 was a cut of 9, gloss of 7, and grit removal of 1200. HCC 400 is cut of 8, gloss of 8, grit removal 1500.

Not that it is a big deal, but curious nonetheless.
Click to expand...

I would imagine the release of the SHC300 had to do with the changing of FG400 description. Before, FG400 was the most potent offering and the rating was determined. With the arrival SHC300 there is now a comparison for the two rather than just making a graph for one.

As for the grit removal rating change, I would imagine it was changed to a more conservative numbering of 1500 as it is safer, easier, and less intensive to pull this out rather than 1200.

Remember, tool variances and pad choices will affect what you are actually able to pull out.
 
So they in development of new products... Nice...Wonder how long till we see a Ultra,Super,Hyper, Mega compound thats 15/10 and polish thats 30/10 lol. On a serious note am curious about the new products in development,hopefully not another AIO with more cut.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top