I've copied and pasted a comment from another thread that you made and I hope that I haven't taken those comments too far out of context, but they did spur a little question that I'd like to ask you.
Here's the quote, and if I've taken it out of context, then I apologize.
It seems these days the pads keep getting smaller and smaller all the way down from 3" pads, to 2" pads, and even 1" pads and respective backing plates. That said...
How concerned should we be of marring the paint when buffing with these small pads?
How much does the tool, dual action vs rotary, factor into this? (I think the rotary would be the biggest concern, but for the sake of those reading I thought I'd include the da in my last question. I may even learn something new.)
Can you get by without any of these, or better yet, which of these smaller sizes do you find yourself using most often?
Here's the quote, and if I've taken it out of context, then I apologize.
My experience is when buffing with small pads there's an increased risk for leaving marring versus larger pads. You're using a very small pad.
![]()
It seems these days the pads keep getting smaller and smaller all the way down from 3" pads, to 2" pads, and even 1" pads and respective backing plates. That said...
How concerned should we be of marring the paint when buffing with these small pads?
How much does the tool, dual action vs rotary, factor into this? (I think the rotary would be the biggest concern, but for the sake of those reading I thought I'd include the da in my last question. I may even learn something new.)
Can you get by without any of these, or better yet, which of these smaller sizes do you find yourself using most often?