Pics were taken only a couple weeks apart- but it's not driven daily- it's been in the garage. So just to be sure we're on the same page, the pictures can be considered to have been in the same condition- I took the top picture outside in daylight, and the bottom picture taken in the garage, at night, lights out, with only the flash of the camera as lighting. I am adding a couple more pics that may show more clearly what I'm seeing.
Basically, the car looks really good in most cases- I have to actually create the conditions required to see this contrast in finishes. It is not noticeable at all 99% of the time. I only noticed it when I was looking for swirls with a flash light in a dark garage, and as I was walking around the car, I noticed that all of the original paint looks very smooth, no swirls, only some random small scratches and scuffs, but reflects that gray tint with the flash light while in the dark; and the repaint areas (the A-post and driver's door) reflect in more of a dark black tint.
It really is not noticeable in daylight at all, and is not noticeable at night, in other car's headlights, or under street lights.
So bottom line, are you suggesting the parts that are fresh paint maybe weren't buffed out, or that they only buffed out the fresh paint?
This is same area in garage with the lights on, and camera flash, and with lights on in garage the area does not reflect gray.
[/IMG]
This pic is with lights off, flash on, but a few feet back to show A-post, so you can tell a little better which part of the car it is. Lights in garage are off, camera flash is on.
[/IMG]
So basically, the only difference in two above pics, is top pic has no ambient lighting. A-post is repaint, hood & fender are factory.