TWEEDERTWEEK
New member
- Apr 16, 2010
- 211
- 0
Holy awesome review Batman! Great job Corey, and thanks for the in depth and time taken to give such a great review.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Corey, like we were talking about on L2D chat, it will benefit everyone greatly to have a realistic test that tests the coatings in a way that would reflect the kind of challenges that face any surface protection. The difficulty lies in creating a test that is aggressive enough yet still is realistic to everyday car care. I'm hoping rubbing a coarse mf across a dry surface will be enough to induce some marks as that would be a good, reasonable, appropriate test. If not, back to the drawing board. Thanks so much for your continued efforts!!:dblthumb2:
How about shooting a bb gun from a rest at a junk panel that is tilted so it's not a direct hit. That would simulate an indirect rock at highway speeds. And for a wash marring test put sand in with wash water and shampoo and make sure to drag the mitt through it.
Sent from my iPad 2 viaTapatalk
1 Month update:
I just wanted to give a quick update with a couple observations.
First the good:
In the area on the roof that had catostrophic clearcoat failure it is holding up very well! After 1 month not one single spot has started to peel. It's only a matter of time but I am surprised it even helped for this long.
Now the bad and the ugly:
I've seen a lot of people say how incredible these coatings self clean or release dirt. While I think there is an improvement I haven't witnessed anything on the level that others talk about. Dirt is released easier but bugs that got splattered on your car and left for a week are not coming off easily. I would say get that image out of your mind. I hope some more people will speak up and tell me I am wrong or right based on what they have seen.
Specifically I found on paint neither coating helped me remove baked on love bugs (maybe I was asking too much) On glass (windshield) I found the Opticoat did outperform Cquartz in ease of removing the bugs. The Opticoat side of the windshield was easier to rid of bugs.
Bugs and debris release better...and baked on bugs release better are two different statements. I would always recommend getting bird bombs and bugs off ASAP or else you are only using the coating as a sacrificial barrier. An interesting thing we've noticed about bird bombs is that sometimes they appear to have etched the coating, but then later the etching disappears. I can't really explain it, but it is very cool.
Bugs and debris release better...and baked on bugs release better are two different statements. I would always recommend getting bird bombs and bugs off ASAP or else you are only using the coating as a sacrificial barrier. An interesting thing we've noticed about bird bombs is that sometimes they appear to have etched the coating, but then later the etching disappears. I can't really explain it, but it is very cool.
Very Thorough review Corey , well done.. as i told you already i admire your time and patient.
few remarks to some guys posts here,
we dont call our coat "permanent coat" since nothing in life is permanent,!
if coating can be removed by chemicals or abrasion it means its not permanent.
we dont like to promise too much as many paint "protection" companies did in past years over the USA, promising "5 years warranty" ,"life time guaranty" etc.. they just ruined this market reputation.
though we say up to 2 years ,Cquartz can last much longer even, as you saw the harsh tests Corey has done, its all in the maintenance after.
about the fun of waxing and detailing your cars... ofcourse it wont replace this fun... some guys like more protection on there cars, less washing it, less marring the paint..
waxing is nice... but as you all saw here this is few "blocks" ahead of any organic /synthetic sealants and others. and still you can use wax on Cquartz coat.
:xyxthumbs:
Layering
As a person who likes to remove the orange peel out by wet-sanding, to me, I care about the total thickness of the clearcoat + Opti-Coat/CQuartz.
It seems like CQuartz is better of the two products because it can be layered. From what I've been reading, Cquartz can be layered and adds 0.7 ~1.5 microns each time. Opti-Coat 2.0 adds 2-3 microns but cannot be layered.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it appears that CQuartz could ultimately provide more UV and paint protection because I can get it thicker with multiple layers.
It also makes sense that CEE DOG noted that "The Opti-Coat seems to be slightly darker particularly on black paint." One application of CQuartz is half as thick as Opti-Coat 2.0. I wonder what the test would have been like when comparing 2 coats of CQuartz (or using the same thickness using a PTG.)
I have not tried either one yet, but I'm leaning toward CQuartz as overall thickness is important to me.[/QUOTE
I am confused by what you are saying. If Opticoat adds 1.5 to 3.0 microns but can not be layered and C Quartz adds .7 to 1.5 microns but can be layered what is the benefit of using CQuartz if Opti Coat provides that amount of thickness in just one coat? Maybe I am missing something but isn't Opti Coat using 1/2 the amount of product to accomplish what CQuartz needs two coats to achieve.
Stu