Whether to seal or coat is purely personal preference. Speaking from my own experience, you have to reset your expectations a bit when switching from sealants to coatings. The coatings' primary purpose is paint longevity, not appearance. So you don't get quite the gloss or the feel of a top-notch sealant when switching to coatings. Not to say a coated car doesn't look sharp when properly cleaned up; they sure do. I personally like knowing the vehicle has an invisible shield on it, protecting it from dirt, IFO, bird droppings, and water spots, and will accept a drop in glossiness. But it depends on what your goals are, and what the vehicle is primarily used for. If I had, say, a fully-restored classic car I took to shows, but rarely drove, I'd probably favor sealants over coatings. However, to maintain the new appearance of a DD, a coating is probably your best bet.
One of my beefs with marketing (and Internet lore) related to the coatings is the notion that they're "permanent." While a coating may be permanent in a chemical sense, in the real world, sooner or later you're going to need to have a door-ding repaired, or a panel replaced due to accident, and the coating will have to be re-applied to the panel. So the notion of "permanent" coatings bugs me a bit, but I've gotten over that now.
Right now, I've got one vehicle with OC 2.0 on it, applied by me; another vehicle has OC Pro, applied by a professsional. In my case, the OC Pro vehicle has a noticeably nicer gloss to it, and I'm very happy with it. I'd probably recommend going that route, if you decide to try a coating.