Review: Chemical Guy's Speed Wipe

swanicyouth

New member
Joined
Mar 3, 2011
Messages
9,388
Reaction score
0
Today's "Spray Wax" is:

bezesynu.jpg


Speed Wipe by Chemical Guys. Recently CGs have came out with a "Vintage" line of products. SW is now relabeled under that line:

yhu9e9a3.jpg


As you can see, it's no longer labeled "Spray Wax and Quick Detailer". It's now labeled "Spray Gloss and Quick Detailer". CGs freely admits this product contains no wax, but does contains polymer protection (sealant). So, assuming the product has only been relabeled and not reformulated, they are now choosing to emphasis the "quick detailer" aspect of the product. Either way, the lines between "spray wax" and "quick detailer" are getting more and more blurred.

SW comes in 3 sizes directly from CGs: 4oz ($4.99), 16oz ($9.99), and 1 gallon ($29.99). That makes the product pretty cheap in my book, especially if your picking it up by the gallon. I'm guessing the product is most commonly sold in the 16oz size - I have 2 bottles in this configuration. Each bottle comes with your standard clear plastic CG's spray head. Those sprayer are neither the best nor the worst. They work well enough to get the job done, but are not noteworthy. The clear sprayers don't atomized the product extremely well, but they don't dribble or leak either.

CG's claims the following regarding SW:

Super slick formula
Fresh cherry scent
UV protection
Reduces static cling by 75%
Enhances shine and protection
Removes dirt, dust, fingerprints and water spots
Also available in 16 ounce size and 4 ounce trial size

To me, the product smells like strawberry bubble gum - not cherries. Either way, the smell is pretty nice and not overbearing. As you will see below, the product looks pink and sprays out pink on the surface:

hyreqeza.jpg


The cool thing about SW is how user friendly and un-streaky it is to use. My experience with it is that it usually just takes a single wipe or "pass" with a towel and it's gone. You are left with a slick glossy surface.

One wipe (from above):

bubu9asa.jpg


SW seems to work well with any towel. It won't matter what you use. Like most spray waxes (liquids), I prefer to use a waffle weave if using on a clean surface. The product is super easy to work with. I find this product is great if you just washed your car a day or so ago and want to remove a days worth of road dust/dirt from the surface. It flashes off a bit faster than a waterless wash, so it's a bit quicker to use - but not too fast. "Speed Wipe" is actually a very good name for this product. Spray it on the panel, wipe - it's gone. It handles light dirt and dust no problem.

It also seems quit slick to me. When you are using it, the slickness is pretty confidence inspiring. You just feel like your not scratching your paint. I'm guessing that is where CG's comes up with the "reduces static cling" claim from. I'm not a big believer that any product actually repels dust from your car. I'm also not a big believer that SW gives much UV protection, as the manufacturer claims it does.

This product does not haze or streak for me, period. It works pretty well in the sun. It also works well on plastic, chrome, and glass. Here is a picture of a window I just cleaned with SW:

5y4eguhy.jpg


I'm able to get perfect glass with this product when using it on lightly soiled glass. One or two wipes and the window is clear and the glass feels slick. I can't really find any fault with this product, and plan on picking it up by the gallon when I run out.

So, the question some may be wondering is how does it compare to V7, CG's poster child for "spray waxes"? Well, honestly, I like it better than V7. Why? Well, it seems to clean better than V7. It also seems a bit slicker than V7 and seems to spread a bit farther than V7. V7 flashes off very fast, maybe a bit too fast. Both are pretty good. SW doesn't seem to affect beading negatively like V7 can do. While SW isn't a terrific beader, it doesn't seem to mute beads either. Longevity is anyone's guess, as I this stuff doesn't seem to affect beading properties much if at all. To me, that's a big deal.

Not like I think it shows anything, but here are some pictures after I used SW as a waterless wash after 2 days of light road dust.

sa6ymy4e.jpg


ranyba2y.jpg


murujyry.jpg


buqepyhu.jpg


peje7a7a.jpg


Then next day I drizzled lightly, beading still tight:

ajy8yte4.jpg


So, I always like to post the MSDS when I do this. I emailed CGs to get the MSDS. I got an email response stating my invoice number was needed to provide me with the MSDS. I emailed them back telling them I bought it at Auto Geek with an image of AGs invoice.

I haven't received a response yet. So, if I get the MSDS I will post it. I'm not sure why some places want to keep this secret. It just doesn't make sense. You can't duplicate the product from the MSDS and it's designed to give the user safety information. What's the point if its difficult (or in some cases impossible) for the user to get?

Then some places will say "the MSDS is for professionals only". I know shops are legally required to have them, but an accidental poisoning or consuming of the product by a child is more likely to happen at home. One would think a "professional" would be taking appropriate safety precautions to begin with, since he is working in his area of expertise and with types of products he is familiar with. That's my take on that.

So, to recap:

- SW is great
- SW is cheap
- SW doesn't streak or haze on paint, glass, or trim
- SW works well as a light waterless wash.
- SW is slick
- SW doesn't affect or boosts beading
- SW is better than V7 IMHO

Thanks for reading. Opinions welcome.
 
I love SpeedWipe and have been using it for years. It's a fantastic all around QD that is economical and gets the job done. After trying it I ended up buying a gallon.
 
Great review, I purchased some a couple of weeks ago. Only thing I don't like is the smell, which I agree is some kind of Strawberry. Definitely slicker than V7 and seems to repel dust. Overall though, works great as a QD. I currently have Blacklight topped with V7 but thats going to change pretty soon, more to be revealed!
 
I've been using this for a few years and love it.
 
Sounds like they copied Adams detail spray, or the other way around lol
 
Sounds like they copied Adams detail spray, or the other way around lol

I've heard so many rumors about this. Main one being Adams is just rebranded cg...who knows what to believe anymore :(
 
I've heard so many rumors about this. Main one being Adams is just rebranded cg...who knows what to believe anymore :(

Now Adam's just has to find away to re-brand that $10,000 peach extract wax and they will be on to something, lol.
 
I've heard so many rumors about this. Main one being Adams is just rebranded cg...who knows what to believe anymore :(

I thought they were both manufactured by warner...

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
 
Aren't they required to have an MSDS posted somewhere?
When they do things like that it makes me dislike them even more than I already do.
 
Aren't they required to have an MSDS posted somewhere?
When they do things like that it makes me dislike them even more than I already do.

Apparently legally it's not required. Don't dislike them too much, AG won't give me one either for their stuff. "Company policy".
 
Aren't they required to have an MSDS posted somewhere?
When they do things like that it makes me dislike them even more than I already do.

Actually, the thing that pisses me off is they asked me for proof of purchase, I provided it - now they are ignoring me.

Yes, that pisses me off.
 
I don't understand what's the big deal anyway, the MSDS doesn't list the recipe of chemicals for the product, nobody is going to use that to steal the product..
I would be pissed too. Hopefully they will get back to you.
 
I know empoyers have to provide them to employees. At work (military), we have to update MSDS's when recieving any HAZMAT and review them for currency annually. I've never seen a manufacturer deny access to the most updated MSDS when requested.

https://www.osha.gov/html/faq-hazcom.html#faq5

When is the chemical manufacturer required to distribute MSDSs?

Hazard information must be transmitted on Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs) that must be distributed to the customer at the time of first shipment of the product. The Hazard Communication Standard also requires that MSDSs be updated by the chemical manufacturer or importer within three months of learning of "new or significant information" regarding the chemical's hazard potential.

I called the CA numbers on the OSHA website and they've both been disconnected.
 
I don't understand what's the big deal anyway, the MSDS doesn't list the recipe of chemicals for the product, nobody is going to use that to steal the product..
I would be pissed too. Hopefully they will get back to you.
RE: MSDS (requirement) exemptions...(with my bolding)...per:

The OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (HCS): 29 CFR 1910.1200.

OSHA does not require that MSDS's be provided to purchasers of household consumer products when the products are used
in the workplace in the same manner that a consumer would use them, i.e.; where the duration and frequency
of use (and therefore exposure) is not greater than what the typical consumer would experience.

section (g)(7)
Requires retail distributors that sell hazardous chemicals to commercial customers
to provide MSDS to such commercial customers upon request.

NOTE:
Distributors obtain the MSDS, of course, from the chemical manufacturer: the preparer of the MSDS.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

MSDS's have 16 sections under the ANSI MSDS standard:

Section 1: Contains the substance/product identity and company contact information.

Here's an example:

SECTION 1: PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION
PRODUCT NAME: G62, Black Wax Tube (24-107A): G6207
MANUFACTURER: Meguiar's, Inc.
DIVISION: Meguiar's
ADDRESS: 17991 Mitchell South, Irvine, CA 92614
Telephone: 949-752-8000 (Fax: 949-752-5784)
EMERGENCY PHONE: CHEMTREC 1-800-424-9300 (24 hours)
Issue Date: 08/08/12
Supercedes Date: 07/31/12
Document Group: 30-9939-7
Product Use:
Intended Use: Automotive

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Knowing the above stipulations makes it easier for me to realize the hesitancy
of some automotive detailing-products' MSDS's being readily distributed.

:)

Bob

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Addendum:
Don't know what changes to the "OSHA MSDS System" will take place when
the "Globally Harmonized System" is instituted World-wide...including the USA.
 
Good info Bob! Would you say someone that owned a Commercial Detailing Business would then have the law on their side to obtain MSDS's upon request?
 
Good info Bob! Would you say someone that owned a Commercial Detailing Business

would then have the law on their side to obtain MSDS's upon request?
If...
To paraphrase "The OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (HCS)"

...household consumer products...where the duration and frequency of use
(and therefore exposure) is greater than what
the typical consumer would experience.


...I would say Yes.

Disclaimers:
1.) I'm not an Attorney...
(Although I do play one on TV; and, I have spent a night at an Holiday Inn Express)

2.) As to: have the law on their side...
Oftentimes it's just a matter of:
money-3.gif





Bob
 
Back
Top