BuckeyeR/T
New member
- Oct 14, 2006
- 347
- 0
What a great review! While I would never choose this wax because of the cost, it was nice to see the results might be worth the $$$
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The wax is way too hard to use the bare hand method. For bare hand application, a softer style wax is preferred.
Thanks Jim, for the reply, and I appreciate your insight. I'm determined to find the 'code' to unlock the 'usefulness' of Primo!![]()
There could be a few reasons--as stated, a unique look. Or a nostalgic feel for a time when products that required that effort were all there was. Or the perception that a $99 product that is hard to use MUST be better than the alternatives.
In the end it doesn't matter, different strokes for different folks. I remember another forum where people were talking about a wax that cost $1800/jar. Some people thought it was ridiculous, and then there were people who had used it who said it was worth the $1800 and you wouldn't understand unless you tried it. I think it's pretty safe to say that the people who thought it was ridiculous were never going to try it, and the people who had were never going to say it wasn't worth it.
Another question, Jim.. how long after application did the product take to 'haze' before you removed it. I'm sorry if i missed that factoid in a previous post..
Thanks Again!
Thanks Jim, for the reply, and I appreciate your insight. I'm determined to find the 'code' to unlock the 'usefulness' of Primo!![]()
Remove after a panel or two. If u let it sit any longer removal isn't fun at all.