Rinseless Washes - 2022

Hobbit said:
One of the DIY coatings. That was the day i finally made my mind up - another conman, with that stupid mustache and fake smile.

His "1-Step" process is a joke as well. DIY rinseless have rinseoff surfactants. If you coat over the rinseless i wouldn't expect much. And don't forget the palm sanders haha! How cool! He's a freakin joke but the joke is on the detailing community for supporting the snake.

His waterspot remover as also been shown to add its own protection. If that's the case i'm 100% correct. He's a snake. People believe they are declogging the coatings but they have been tricked.

"And don't forget buy my waffle pad because any other pad with cause too much heat! Money! MORE Money!".

And if it doesn't go as plan he will just blame the user or some other variable. "You messed up and have to re-install! More Money! I will support you all the way!..." lol man i might throw out my DIY rinseless frankly.
Click to expand...

I asked him to prove rinsing a vehicle with a power washer can cause swirls, and this was his lame reply. Smh.

d74dde806c8c610a28d5978d97232d6a.png


Btw, I think this recent video proves that Detail Co rinseless wash also uses rinseoff surfactants…


Edit: I just realized that vid. had been posted in this thread already. My bad if it’s already been discussed, I’m just now catching up.
 
Klasse Act said:
Lame is an understatement

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Seriously right? He left himself so wide open that I haven’t even decided how to respond to that.lol.

That’s beyond a weak excuse.. Put up, or shut up spreading that disinformation. There’s hoards of people that actually believe that crap. Lol.
 
Texchappy said:
In t

In The sun with rinseless wash, I’ve always done one panel at a time. Working my way around the car prespraying (if I do), contact wash, then drying that panel before doing the next.
Click to expand...

That’s what KC recommends. Eddie Colon in his video did it in direct sunlight and did about half a truck with no problems


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Setec Astronomy said:
He does talk like a chemist, but not one that's ever been in the real world. He says the Dawn ingredient needs to be rinsed because otherwise it will etch. The Nemesis SDS says it's in Nemesis at a rate of 1-5%, and that Nemesis is 40-55% water. So just in the bottle, that ingredient is already diluted at least 1:8, and then I'm going to dilute that again at 1:256...I'd argue that your "rinseless" wash already has plenty of water in it to "rinse" that ingredient off.
Click to expand...

I just want to clarify that I merely skimmed through that video long enough to hear him mention the part where he said that.. I’m not vouching for his word, I simply posted it because I heard someone else mention the topic in a previous post in this thread.
 
I love how many, many "experts" on YouTube will brow beat people who use 2 buckets and grit guards to do a RW...oh yeah, pre-treating a panel at a time as well. I'd never call myself an "expert" but I know this, I taught some guys how to do a RW over the weekend and we emptied THREE buckets of rinse water, couldn't even see the grit guard. .ind you, the car was dirty but not like mud flung up the sides and everywhere.

I wish I could release a single how to video on doing RW's properly or properly to logical thinking people

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
 
Eldorado2k said:
I asked him to prove rinsing a vehicle with a power washer can cause swirls, and this was his lame reply. Smh.

d74dde806c8c610a28d5978d97232d6a.png


Btw, I think this recent video proves that Detail Co rinseless wash also uses rinseoff surfactants…


Edit: I just realized that vid. had been posted in this thread already. My bad if it’s already been discussed, I’m just now catching up.
Click to expand...
Tell him to do it on a test panel then, problem solved.
 
Eldorado2k said:
That was my 1st thought, the other side of my brain wants to flame the hell out of him.. I haven’t decided which path to take. Lol.
Click to expand...
Like he'll listen, a narcissistic person like will only listen to themselves and others in his circle jerk. This is the same person who released a video years ago stating 2BM traditional washes were "so 20th century"

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
 
Klasse Act said:
. This is the same person who released a video years ago stating 2BM traditional washes were "so 20th century"
Click to expand...
I've seen a video where Yvan puts the kibosh on the two bucket method. A lot of other people do as well and most sight it as too time consuming or a waste of time.
Personally I find that reasoning a little skewed. The two bucket system via any wash method seems like very good dirt/contaminant control to me. So it takes maybe 5 minutes more. I'm not really concerned about how long my wash is taking. If I was I probably would be hand washing in the first place.
 
BLM said:
I've seen a video where Yvan puts the kibosh on the two bucket method. A lot of other people do as well and most sight it as too time consuming or a waste of time.
Personally I find that reasoning a little skewed. The two bucket system via any wash method seems like very good dirt/contaminant control to me. So it takes maybe 5 minutes more. I'm not really concerned about how long my wash is taking. If I was I probably would be hand washing in the first place.
Click to expand...


He's looking at from a business standpoint but even then, a safer, better wash benefits YOU and the customer, what do I know, I'm ab enthusiast

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
 
Klasse Act said:


He's looking at from a business standpoint but even then, a safer, better wash benefits YOU and the customer, what do I know, I'm ab enthusiast

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
So why don't they push the multiple wash pad/mitt method if looking at it from a business point? I personally have so many mitts and sponges I've lost count but that feels the safest to me. The only reason I have a second bucket is to discard each used mitt or RW sponge into once done and until laundry time. Mitts also have to be replaced over time.

Am I weird? Or just OCD?

Sent from my SM-S938U1 using Tapatalk
 
Uncbrs said:
So why don't they push the multiple wash pad/mitt method if looking at it from a business point? I personally have so many mitts and sponges I've lost count but that feels the safest to me. The only reason I have a second bucket is to discard each used mitt or RW sponge into once done and until laundry time. Mitts also have to be replaced over time.

Am I weird? Or just OCD?

Sent from my SM-S938U1 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
That method reminds me of the GD method and I see nothing wrong with doing that, do you still pre-treat before hand

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
 
Here is the way I look at the two bucket vs one bucket. With the two bucket the vast majority of the contaminants are left behind in the rinse bucket. With one bucket all that dirt is going back into the wash bucket.
Unless one uses the GD method and to be honest that may be the ultimate for dirt control but just a little involved for me.
The rinse bucket works for me. Maybe there are better ways but I'm content with two buckets.
 
BLM said:
Here is the way I look at the two bucket vs one bucket. With the two bucket the vast majority of the contaminants are left behind in the rinse bucket. With one bucket all that dirt is going back into the wash bucket.
Unless one uses the GD method and to be honest that may be the ultimate for dirt control but just a little involved for me.
The rinse bucket works for me. Maybe there are better ways but I'm content with two buckets.
Click to expand...


Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
 
BLM said:
I've seen a video where Yvan puts the kibosh on the two bucket method. A lot of other people do as well and most sight it as too time consuming or a waste of time.
Personally I find that reasoning a little skewed. The two bucket system via any wash method seems like very good dirt/contaminant control to me. So it takes maybe 5 minutes more. I'm not really concerned about how long my wash is taking. If I was I probably would be hand washing in the first place.
Click to expand...
When it comes to the number of buckets do what works for you. I can see the benefits of two buckets but I use one. I wash my car damn near weekly and if it was scratching the paint my car would be hammered. If I use a foam cannon my rinse off of the initial foaming takes away all of the grit and damn near all of the dirt. When I do a RW, I typically flood the panels using my Multi 12. Both of my cars are coated so the self cleaning aspect helps but when it comes to detailing do you and keep it moving.
 
Klasse Act said:
That method reminds me of the GD method and I see nothing wrong with doing that, do you still pre-treat before hand

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Only a hobby so keep that in mind.

For a full wash, I'm going to do a prewash and multiple mitts. It's overkill but better safe than sorry in my opinion. The second bucket is to discard the mitts until washed. And in this case, mitts is typically the Autofiber Flat Out pads and Block pads. Love these things.

For a RW, I'm going to pre-treat and still use multiple sponges. It's overkill again but the money was already invested and it is kind of interesting to see if different sponges REALLY matter. I mentioned I liked the Ethos sponge but still need to use it with another RW to see if it was the RW, or the sponge, or the combo. The second bucket is again to discard the sponge once used. Always with some water + RW in to start the soaking process a bit. I don't launder the sponges like I do the microfiber pads.

My methods were probably developed more as a way to justify my purchases than to get scientific... in fact, I've always hated science.

Sent from my SM-S938U1 using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top