Dr Oldz
New member
- Aug 31, 2010
- 4,462
- 0
Sorry, this isn't going to be an informative review on how to use a waterless wash or boring pictures of a panel that is half dirty and half clean that a camera angle may or may not show swirls. This is just intended to be my thoughts on how this product preformed for me. .
PBMG was kind enough to send me out a bottle of this prior to it's release for some testing. I have tried many WW's that are on the market and have settled with UWWP as my personal choice for WW due to it's overall great performance and amazing value when purchased in concentrate form. So I feel that what I expect a WW to do has some pretty high standards.
My choice of cleaning media is always a plush MF for WW such as the Chinchillas. I also do not expect a WW to safely remove heavy grime and mud after a full day of 4 wheeling. Very light dust, non baked on bug remains and smudges IS what I expect a WW to remove safely from my finish.
Enter BF WDWW. Pretty simple summary here....
-Cleans very well.
-Safely removes particles with out marring or scratching the surface.
-Wipes off with ease and finishes streak free even in temps down to 35F
-Has a subtile citrus(lemony) scent that is nice.
-Supplied sprayer in the RTU version does a great job at atomizing product.
-Overall just a great product that I really enjoyed using
-I feel that this and UWWP perform exactly the same and both are the finest WW's available.
I know UWWP has Poly Charger in it.
BF WDWW has polymers in that bond to the paint to add some protection while revitalizing the freshly waxed look.
UWWP concentrate cost $21 for 5.5 gallons of useable product while BF cost considerably more in terms of useable product. That being said, I have not noticed any real enhancement in the look department from BF but I have noticed that beading can be increased if you LSP is falling off, so obviously there the polymers are grabbing hold and doing something. In comparison, I notice UWWP does add some protection but not as much.
I personally treat a WW as a wash and don't expect gloss enhancement or protection from them but knowing that you get some is nice.
My conclusion: While the price may be more than my personal favorite, I feel you have to give this a shot. If you are using the BF system on your vehicle, perhaps the polymers can be a real benefit to the look or durability(perhaps Todd can step in here and maybe better explain how exactly the polymers in the WW really play with the other BF products).
For me to even say a product compares or is equal to UWWP makes it a winner in my book. Another great BF product for sure.
Thanks, Jim
PBMG was kind enough to send me out a bottle of this prior to it's release for some testing. I have tried many WW's that are on the market and have settled with UWWP as my personal choice for WW due to it's overall great performance and amazing value when purchased in concentrate form. So I feel that what I expect a WW to do has some pretty high standards.
My choice of cleaning media is always a plush MF for WW such as the Chinchillas. I also do not expect a WW to safely remove heavy grime and mud after a full day of 4 wheeling. Very light dust, non baked on bug remains and smudges IS what I expect a WW to remove safely from my finish.
Enter BF WDWW. Pretty simple summary here....
-Cleans very well.
-Safely removes particles with out marring or scratching the surface.
-Wipes off with ease and finishes streak free even in temps down to 35F
-Has a subtile citrus(lemony) scent that is nice.
-Supplied sprayer in the RTU version does a great job at atomizing product.
-Overall just a great product that I really enjoyed using
-I feel that this and UWWP perform exactly the same and both are the finest WW's available.
I know UWWP has Poly Charger in it.
BF WDWW has polymers in that bond to the paint to add some protection while revitalizing the freshly waxed look.
UWWP concentrate cost $21 for 5.5 gallons of useable product while BF cost considerably more in terms of useable product. That being said, I have not noticed any real enhancement in the look department from BF but I have noticed that beading can be increased if you LSP is falling off, so obviously there the polymers are grabbing hold and doing something. In comparison, I notice UWWP does add some protection but not as much.
I personally treat a WW as a wash and don't expect gloss enhancement or protection from them but knowing that you get some is nice.
My conclusion: While the price may be more than my personal favorite, I feel you have to give this a shot. If you are using the BF system on your vehicle, perhaps the polymers can be a real benefit to the look or durability(perhaps Todd can step in here and maybe better explain how exactly the polymers in the WW really play with the other BF products).
For me to even say a product compares or is equal to UWWP makes it a winner in my book. Another great BF product for sure.
Thanks, Jim
rops:
