4ord
New member
- Dec 11, 2012
- 224
- 0
Sorry guys, that's an urban legend
I know, but "no va" really means he/she/it does not go. I know a little spanish. lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry guys, that's an urban legend
Bill, I just love how we are all starting to tell our age in this thread.
I have a particular affinity towards that model/body style as my first car in 73 was a used 70~71 white Mercury Comet GT, 302 2-bolt, automatic. I learned to work on cars with that thing. It's the car that brought my wife and I together. We worked on it all the time, didn't need anything done to it, but I was constantly putting hot rod parts on it.
Finally wrapped it around a telephone pole doing about 35, SIDEWAYS off a dam about 8' in the air, DIRECTLY in the drivers door handle!Cut the pole in half, spun the car around and threw us (me and a racing buddy) down the dam into a swamp. My seat ended up on top of the passenger seat.
Then my 3rd car was yet another, black Comet GT. The interior was button tucked diamond pleated black naugahyde (had to kill a lot of little 'nauga's' to get all that hyde. :laughing: That one however had a 4-bolt 302, 12.7:1 Speed Pro pistons, 612° lift cam, Offenhauser racing intake with a NASCAR 1050cfm carb, and about everything else you could think of. Most of it was done when I bought it but I did change out the headers, dual point distributer, big ol' super coil, fat wires, and put a 4" short pipe exhaust on it, doing away with stupid glass packs, and some competition J style traction bars. The rear axle was pulled from a Torino 429 'shaker' car and was about 1½" too long on each end with a 4:10 gear.
That puppy would pull the front wheels about 8" up and freaking FLY!!!:hotrod2:
We had gas lines and I was driving around in a car that got about 7mpg (if I was lucky). Still like those Comets to this day, neat hood and that fastback kinda' styling with the black out rounded tail lights that stuck out a bit where the Maverick was a long flat style. I'd maybe buy one today if I found one I like.... (just don't tell my wife). :bolt:
Don't want to take this thread too sideways, but do you remember the Falcons/Comets from the early 60's that had a 289, 4 speed, super light weight interior? Those things were just plain RAPID!
One guy I knew (back then) had one and would just sucker some "cool car" into a '$5 a gear' street drag. Let's just say, he DID buy a lot hamburgers for his buddies (yum-Bob's Big Boy!).
Bill
Had several 'bad' ones, but some were my own fault, I beat the H - - - out of them.
64 Galaxie with a 289 that I drove like it was a 390. Best mpg was 12, no matter how it was driven.
64 Impala that was wrecked before I bought it used. 5 trannies in a year, 3 - three speeds and 2 Borg-Warner t-10 4 speeds. Spit on the hood and it wouldn't start. It ran like a raped ape when it ran, but it didn't run long, or often.
1981 Chevy Citation X-11. Poor mpg, as many miles on the back of a tow truck as on the road. Funny, the odometer ran backwards between the 2nd and 3rd owners, and they had problems with it too. Air filters were 10 - 12 bucks, available only from the dealer, couldn't find an after-market one. The only good thing about it was I hounded the dealer so much, he gave me a deal on a Chrysler New Yorker, I had other dealers tell me to run back and buy it, before that guy realized he was losing money.
There are lemons in every brand. I don't know why, but there seems to be a few that just don't work. I've just had the best luck with Fords and Chrysler products, although the wife had good luck with GM products.
.....
The power, or lack there of, made me fear for my life a couple of times. I'd merge into two lane traffic, with the pedal to the floor, and I wouldn't go anywhere. There was no power to this thing. I tried it on back roads. There were a lot of RPMs, but no HP or torque. The tires squealed at 20 MPH. Everything was cheap black plastic, sound system was awful, the cheapest headliner I've ever seen. It wasn't as bad as what some of you have said, but that car was probably close to $20k new. I couldn't imagine anyone buying one for that price, or even with $5k off. I'd rather get a five year old TL or Accord for that money.
A 2003 Toyota Carmy XLE
The car was bought new with less than 2 miles on it and never was in an accident or even bumped!
in 100,000 miles
Toyota prides themselves on 92% of the Toyota Camry's sold since 1988 are still on the road today but what they didn't tell you is it cost $60,000 to keep them there....
- 4 sets of brakes & rotors
- 2 sets of calipers
- 2 catalytic converters
- 2 exhaust system from the cats (forward)
- 1 Computer
- 6 sensors
- Door locks stopped working 1 at a time
- If the drivers door locked you couldn't open the door
- Drivers side rear window stopped working
- Passengers side front window stopped working
- Drivers door window fell out of it's track
86 ford mustang gt. Every part on that car broke 2 or 3 times. Because of that car I now refuse to buy ford or american cars.
I had a 1989 Hyundai Excel. Because of that car I now refuse to buy Hyundai or Korean cars.