P&S Beadmaker test – long post.
My small bottle of Beadmaker arrived and I wanted to have the same orgasmic experience as the detailers on YouTube. For the record, I am a big fan of Pan the Organizer and the guys at TRC, their videos and production qualities are first class. That said, I’ve watched Prosperity Televangelists who showed less excitement about the Almighty showering you with riches than detailers waxing on (pun intended) about Beadmaker.
So here was the test I did. I do not claim this to be definitive in any way, merely what I could devise without too much time or trouble on my part. My 2018 Ford Transit Connect has been polished and coated with Gyeon Can Coat some months ago. I apply Gyeon Cure about every 4 weeks. For this test, I used Optimum Power-Clean at 3 to 1 on my hood twice, to remove any remaining sealant. Optimum states that Power-Clean will remove sealants, and it does so in my experience as well.
I then sectioned off the hood into four quadrants. Panel A was the Can Coat only control panel, Panel B had Beadmaker applied, Panel C was Gyeon Cure, and Panel D was Optimum Hyper-Seal. I used new and washed micro-fiber towels (TRC Eagle Edgeless) for application and buffing. I have a lot of experience with applying Cure and Hyper-Seal but my first time with Beadmaker. I used one spray for Hyper-Seal, two sprays for Cure and 10 sprays for Beadmaker. Beadmaker was running off the car. These were all applied in my garage which was 63 degrees.
I waited 8 hours and then took a reading with a cheap gloss meter I bought off Amazon for this test. 60 degree meter. Remember the sealants are being applied over the CanCoat coating. Here are the results. By the way, I laboriously "space bared" all the charts below into even columns but the Forum software took all the spaces out. Sorry for the formatting.
View attachment 65457
Gloss Meter
Reading CanCoat Beadmaker Cure Hyper-Seal
1 92.3 92.4 90.7 96.0
2 93.8 90.7 90.7 94.7
3 92.9 92.1 92.6 93.0
Average 93.0 91.7 91.3 94.6
Median 93.0 91.9 91.0 94.6
All the panels looked equally glossy to both my wife and me.
I left the van in the garage and did not drive it after applying the sealants. On Monday morning I drove to work and got ten volunteers to complete a survey. The test was blind, they did not know the name of the products and the panels were labeled A-D. They were rating the panels from 1 to 4 (1 being best) and could give the same score to more than one panel. For example, one person scored them all a 1. All of the 10 people said they looked identical, so I handed out a Scan Grip light and they went way overboard examining each panel. I thought they took this way too seriously �� Here are the results of their survey. They were not allowed to share answers.
Gloss Survey
CanCoat Beadmaker Cure Hyper-Seal
1 1 2 4 3
2 3 1 2 4
3 2 1 3 4
4 3 2 1 4
5 2 1 3 4
6 2 1 3 4
7 4 1 2 3
8 3 1 4 2
9 1 1 1 1
10 3 2 1 4
Avg 2.4 1.3 2.4 3.3
Median 2.5 1.0 2.5 4.0
Slickness Survey
CanCoat Beadmaker Cure Hyper-Seal
1 4 2 1 3
2 3 1 2 4
3 3 1 2 4
4 3 2 1 4
5 3 1 2 4
6 2 1 3 4
7 4 1 2 3
8 3 1 2 4
9 3 1 2 4
10 3 2 1 4
Avg 3.1 1.3 1.8 3.8
Median 3.0 1.0 2.0 4.0
I did the obligatory water test after work, and my wife and I both selected Gyeon Cure and Beadmaker as the clear winners in water run off speed. They were identical in performance as best we could tell.
For ease of application, I would give the nod to Hyper-Seal because one spray and then a second pass to buff, and you’re done. Gyeon Cure came in second, because it takes a bit more buffing, and Beadmaker definitely required more buffing to eliminate streaking given all the product being used.
Some time ago, when I switched from Hyper-Seal and Opti-Seal to Gyeon Cure, I noticed the better water behavior immediately. Using my blower, I could push the water off the van much faster and easier with Cure. The obligatory beading picture below.
View attachment 65458
My final test is next week when I wash, because I applied Beadmaker to the roof of the van. Beadmaker did feel the slickest to me, but I don’t know whether that translates to better water behavior or not. Being a horizontal surface, it takes more work to blow the water off the roof. If Beadmaker makes that easier than Cure, that would be valuable to me. That said, blowing the hood dry after the water test, they both performed identically.
I haven't tested for durability which would be critical for many, but not me, because I find it easy to apply sealant every month or so.
Here are my final thoughts. Does Beadmaker provide the most gloss of any sealant? Arguable, but there was no practical difference between any of them. Is Beadmaker the slickest sealant? Of the ones I tested here, yes. Here’s where I see the benefit of slickness is: Suppose you were a famous YouTube personality and your work or home was constantly ringed by protestors upset at your latest video. With Beadmaker on your car, you could drive through the mass of protestors, and they would slide off the car without sticking. I don’t have that problem, but good to know there is a solution out there for it.
Is Beadmaker a great product. Yes. Is it life-changing? Not in my humble opinion. Will I switch from Cure? Probably not, we'll see what happens with the roof test. I'm going to spray it on my coated tires too, and see if it adds gloss. It's cheap enough that soaking a tire would be practical, whereas that would take a fortune in Hyper-Seal or Cure.