Any Audiophiles Here?

I run lossless rips into a Schiit DAC into a NAD integrated amp into pioneer sp-bs22lr's via some bargain Kimber cables. also run a rega turntable, but my vinyl collecting grows slower than my cd's. prior to this system i listened to all my music through some cheap m-audio home studio monitors. I care much less about volume than quality. i have sensitive hearing, being 32 years old and still able to hear 20k+ frequencies (normally gone by your late teens) despite all the loud rock shows i've been to that left my ears ringing for 2 days. that doesn't make me have "golden ears", it just makes some sounds and systems almost painful for me to listen to.

as far as the cables go, i can't say. the ones i use definitely made a difference over the radio shack "premium" speaker wire i used before. as with so many hobbies, once you get into the real expensive stuff it is all just snake oil, imho.

i've got a budget system (practically non-existent compared to the guy above), and am done chasing the dragon, barring my winning the lottery, in which case its a pair of b&w 802's. that was what first gave me the itch, hearing them in a showroom while they played some jaco pastorius. i seriously thought they had wall mounted speakers in different spots behind the 802's because the imaging was so tight and defined- mind blowing..... and also the cost of a house.

you are never going to do any critical listening in a car, but quality speakers and a decent amp make a world of difference, even if you aren't into trunk rattling.
 
Some what yes......I'm currently collecting old school amps in great to mint condition to use in my truck or mustang (stang already has an Oz Audio 50.4 amp powering 4 Oz Audio 5x7's).
A/D/S circa 2000 amp I picked up in great condition
IMG_0189Medium_zpsd919b53e.jpg

But then I bid and won this gem I have wanted for a while
Precision Power A404 White Art amp from 1994 with original manual and box
IMG_0226_zps42b3dc7d.jpg

IMG_0228_zps2ddab186.jpg

IMG_0229_zpse6f35085.jpg

Both amps are considered by many in the car audio world as having thee best sound quality of their time and today.
Truth be told tho the PPI amp is so mint I actually don't want to use it :*(.
 
Some what yes......I'm currently collecting old school amps in great to mint condition to use in my truck or mustang (stang already has an Oz Audio 50.4 amp powering 4 Oz Audio 5x7's).
A/D/S circa 2000 amp I picked up in great condition
IMG_0189Medium_zpsd919b53e.jpg

But then I bid and won this gem I have wanted for a while
Precision Power A404 White Art amp from 1994 with original manual and box
IMG_0226_zps42b3dc7d.jpg

IMG_0228_zps2ddab186.jpg

IMG_0229_zpse6f35085.jpg

Both amps are considered by many in the car audio world as having thee best sound quality of their time and today.
Truth be told tho the PPI amp is so mint I actually don't want to use it :*(.
Your like the Wax collectors. Lol

Well not my thing, but congrats on your new gear.

You have to at least listen to it once. Unless it dramatically lowers the value of it and that's what you are collecting too, for the value I mean.

I think you beat a lot of us here. Props man! :props:
 
Your like the Wax collectors. Lol
Thinned out the M16 but my Pinnacle Paste Glaz you just don't see much these days
PictureorVideo100Medium.jpg








Well not my thing, but congrats on your new gear.
Thanks

You have to at least listen to it once. Unless it dramatically lowers the value of it and that's what you are collecting too, for the value I mean.

I think you beat a lot of us here. Props man! :props:
I want to listen to it but not until I get the right (to me) speakers. And it won't hurt the value any it's just I don't want to ruin the art work (or risk it) as you don't find many with the art work this intact.
 
I think the comparison is parallel for a slightly different reason.

Remember 10 years ago, when the OEM car stereos and the car waxes available.OTC were terrible?

Now the stock Bose system in my Denali is better than the aftermarket stuff I had before.

The quality of OTC waxes and other car care products has also evolved in leaps and bounds with Meguiar's Ultimate Paste Wax and others available OTC at very good prices.
 
Some what yes......I'm currently collecting old school amps in great to mint condition to use in my truck or mustang (stang already has an Oz Audio 50.4 amp powering 4 Oz Audio 5x7's).
A/D/S circa 2000 amp I picked up in great condition

But then I bid and won this gem I have wanted for a while
Precision Power A404 White Art amp from 1994 with original manual and box

Both amps are considered by many in the car audio world as having thee best sound quality of their time and today.
Truth be told tho the PPI amp is so mint I actually don't want to use it :*(.

Wow... where you been all my life???!?!?!!?!?!

I still have two old ADS amps in the basement! :D (Much older than those though. A 2x20 & 2x40 that I used for the mids and tweets.) Experienced the early days of Orion, even JBL. Used to think I'd some day grow up and get some Precision Power stuff but the ADS just kept kicking. ;)

Didn't even mention my vinyl collection as I've bought hardly any in the last 20 years. But it's up somewhere between 400~500. Never really upgraded from a well loved PF-800 turntable with a Dynavector 23RS. Come to think of it on the lesser end... nothing sounds as good, clean, and with a lack of rumble (especially on old warped vinyl) as my other favorite, the Shure VR15 line contact.

Saw the mention of a nice DAC. Might I suggest looking into MSB Technologies. We shared a room twice at THE Show (Tyler Acoustics that I mentioned in the other thread) with them, and various transport, amplifier and turntable manufacturers. The first time my wife heard even their cheapest DAC switched into and out of the loop she thought it was a 12 band EQ boosting the low end, clearing up the mid-bass, and bringing out the detail in the high end. But oh no it wasn't, just a nice DAC pulling the best from every day CD's via a digital out on (the first year) a Sony DVP-S7000. Of course the next year it all got nuts with esoteric CD transport guys wanting you to use their (small home priced) equipment to play your CD's with. :rolleyes:

The thing is, 15 years ago you could buy their DAC's for $495, $995, $1295 etc. and they sounded AWESOME. Today... pffffft..... OMG!!!!! :rolleyes: :eek: rolleyes: Their cheapest one is TEN GRAND :rolleyes: and of course if you want to spend SEVENTY FIVE GRAND Larry and the boys will hook a brother up. And of course you have to spend four to twelve grand for a transport! Seriously???!!?!?!!!!!?!!! WhoTF would do something so stupid? :laughing:

I'd still suggest anyone that wants extremely good imaging, ROCK SOLIDLY built cabinets with true furniture grade veneers, and the best drivers and crossovers money can buy.... to check out Tyler Acoustics. Just plan on a while to talk on the phone to Ty.... he's quite a salesman (and not a bad critical listener either). ;)
 
To expand on what i said before, i don't think the speaker placements suit critical listening in a car. Anything is possible with enough money though.

As good as oem systems are in cars, some of the ipod integration (such as my newer vw) has such a crappy DAC that it sounds better to use the analog input with my player than to use the interface and control it through the stereo. That is where most of the gains are made in sound quality these days, and if you have crappy DAC, then it is better to have less precise speakers, as it hides it and smooths it out a bit.

Pretty much every aftermarket stereo i hear, even the cheaper ones have much better DAC than oem. (The cars in my price range i should clarify)
 
Speaking of a connection between detailing and audio. I once Armor All'd a CD.
 
The only old car audio amp I had worth some money was the Orion HCCA cheater. You could bridge that thing at 1/4 ohm...I had it running a pair of HCCA 10's in my 97 GTP.
 
I find it quite hilarious that in one message the term "audiophile" was mentioned, then shortly afterwards a dialog of car stereo systems broke out. :laughing: I *whole heartedly* agree that car stereo and audiophile just don't go together.

That being said; you can surely, SURELY spend stupid amounts of hard earned money in car audio. And.... that audio can sound pretty darned good, or at least loud, but NOWHERE NEAR accurate, open, well imaged, articulate, and all the other "audiophilia" words that are tossed around. :rolleyes:
May I ask what kind of experience you have with sound quality installations in cars? I don't mean old school radio, eq, amps and speakers. I mean DSPs, custom speaker placement, time alignment, individual driver EQ, etc.

I agree that cars are virtually the worst environment for audio imaginable but I don't believe you give enough credit to how good they CAN sound.

I also kind of interpret the OP's post as a direct comparison between "audiophiles" and "wax fanatics". Those that claim they can hear the difference between 6ft RCA cable A and 6ft RCA cable B. Similarly, people believe there are drastic differences between the depth, gloss, warmth, etc between waxes. To me, in audio, speaker choice is the biggest factor in the overall characteristics of what we perceive(hear). I'm generalizing, I know, but just imagine all other things are equal. Speaker choice plays the biggest role.

As for the way a car looks, I believe the prep is the most important factor. There are minor differences in LSPs, sure... but how apparent are the differences on perfectly polished paint?
 
Which one would you guys go with Alpine type R or a Pioneer Champion? I do have an Alpine stereo though so could keep it in the family.

Alpine
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvOJGL37t6U]Single alpine type r 12" ripping car apart - YouTube[/video]

Pioneer Champion

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIzKqMgKVOo]12" Pioneer Champion Series Pro - YouTube[/video]

I haven't been as involved in car audio as I used to be. I started with a type r, which is a good sub, but I don't think I would go with it again given the choice of speakers I could buy now. Depends what you're looking for... Loud? Quality? What type of music? What type of box are you going to have? I know in my experience the type r just didn't sound that great until I built a ported box for it. Something like 2cuft tuned to 33 hz. Sounded great then. Now I have a much larger and more expensive speaker, but there are some really great options for not a ton of money.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using AG Online
 
I wouldn't say I'm a full out "audiophile" but I just appreciate music when its properly played. That said I have a clean install in my 350z setup and tuned for SQ thats pretty damn accurate.

Heres some pics for reference.
A little SQ 350z Install. :) - Car Audio | DiyMobileAudio.com | Car Stereo Forum
and
A little SQ 350z Install. :) - MY350Z.COM Forums

To each their own but at the end of the day I enjoy a nicely detailed car that sounds good as well.
Oooooh! Now we're talking!

Seas Reference looks gorgeous and SIS(I guess just Bing at the time) does great work! I had seas Excel in my old car. Bet yours sounds awesome. Really nice setup.
 
Oooooh! Now we're talking!

Seas Reference looks gorgeous and SIS(I guess just Bing at the time) does great work! I had seas Excel in my old car. Bet yours sounds awesome. Really nice setup.

Thanks! Yep it was just Bing at the time. I wanted a clean hidden install.
 
I wouldn't say I'm a full out "audiophile" but I just appreciate music when its properly played. That said I have a clean install in my 350z setup and tuned for SQ thats pretty damn accurate.

Heres some pics for reference.
A little SQ 350z Install. :) - Car Audio | DiyMobileAudio.com | Car Stereo Forum
and
A little SQ 350z Install. :) - MY350Z.COM Forums

To each their own but at the end of the day I enjoy a nicely detailed car that sounds good as well.
Wow man nice install :xyxthumbs:, I wish I could do or afford work like that.
 
May I ask what kind of experience you have with sound quality installations in cars? I don't mean old school radio, eq, amps and speakers. I mean DSPs, custom speaker placement, time alignment, individual driver EQ, etc.

I agree that cars are virtually the worst environment for audio imaginable but I don't believe you give enough credit to how good they CAN sound.

I also kind of interpret the OP's post as a direct comparison between "audiophiles" and "wax fanatics". Those that claim they can hear the difference between 6ft RCA cable A and 6ft RCA cable B. Similarly, people believe there are drastic differences between the depth, gloss, warmth, etc between waxes. To me, in audio, speaker choice is the biggest factor in the overall characteristics of what we perceive(hear). I'm generalizing, I know, but just imagine all other things are equal. Speaker choice plays the biggest role.

As for the way a car looks, I believe the prep is the most important factor. There are minor differences in LSPs, sure... but how apparent are the differences on perfectly polished paint?

Well, of course... as I mentioned... one can spend stupid amounts of money in car audio. I've had experience with custom tuning individual crossovers for speaker sets. Also have had (still do) several AudioControl components, most similar to their current EQL, EQS, EQX type components. Of course in addition to the Morel drivers I mentioned earlier I've had Altec, JVC, JBL, SEAS, Vifa, Scanspeak and may other drivers.

High end auto installs can (and do) sound quite well. But given the constraints, there just are too many physics going against any installation that you simply don't have when installing into a proper room. Dollar for dollar you can take the same expenditure in a rectangle shaped room and have exponentially better sound. ;)

The inherent problem that will always exist within the confines of an automobile/truck/van etc. is you just do not physically have the space to reproduce a given sound wave. For instance, low bass will never physically be able to be reproduced inside the confines of an automobile due to the wavelengths involved. (IE: 24Hz=28.25ft @ sea level @ 72°) And that is before it hits a wall and needs to reflect back, double that for a full sine wave inside the area. Move down to 20Hz and you need a full 56.5 feet! Then take synthesized/electronic bass from a lot of today's music where they'll mix it down to 14~16Hz and you're looking at a wavelength of 70~80 FEET! :eek:

Yet inside the vehicle you indeed have the impression that you are experiencing true, low, bass. How does that happen? Simple, you are pressurizing the internal area, and your entire body, eardrums and everything else is simply oscillating (more or less) in unison with the bass drivers. Open the hatch, all the doors, give the sound a place to go and WHAM the bass outside will truly reach "sub" levels. It's turning your body literally into a passive radiator. ;)

Which also goes to why the cops travelling around outside say the bass is so loud to them when inside all you're doing is just having a good time. :rolleyes:

I had a client one time that called me in to look at his room and help him get the bass from it that he really craved. The room was already well constructed, dual layer sheetrock with Isodamp between the layers, and the sheetrock mounted on hat channel screwed to staggered 4x6 studs. Not much sound was escaping from the room, which was a GREAT thing. Also the dimensions were pretty good as it was almost 3 times as long as wide.

The thing is he had is sofa located in the wrong place. When he called me he was a big fan of Jurassic Park (where the dinosaur stomps and the water vibrates) he wanted the ROOM TO SHAKE when the dinosaur STOMPED. So I pulled out my tape measure and started taking measurements. Front to back, side to side, speaker placement, sofa (prime listening placement)... the whole thing. Plugged that into a spreadsheet I had at the time and it gave me the more optimal measurements that we should be working with.

Then I played a few test tones while I went around the room with my spl meter taking measurements.

"Good news" I said, after spending half an hour doing all of the above. Then I asked him had he ever noticed when he was standing right behind his sofa (which was about in the middle of the room as it was a 32'+ long room) did he notice that the bass was MUCH better standing behind the sofa than when he was sitting on the sofa.

"Sure" he replied, "But I thought that was because I was just standing up and getting more bass off the ceiling".

The thing is, that wasn't true. The truth was where the sofa was sitting he was directly in a -8dB - 34Hz suck-out. I told him if he'd move the sofa back 3 feet that he would solve his bass problems. Because THERE was where the bass was! That I could save him THREE to FOUR thousand dollars, just move the sofa! :) He laughed and said that he wanted more than that. :laughing:

He said he wanted THE ROOM TO SHAKE. So I replied that we could do what the car stereo guys do, pressurize the room. ;) We could make it so, that with so many bass drivers that you had no choice to not only hear the bass (even if it wasn't accurate) but you would indeed FEEL THE BASS no matter where you were inside the room.

At that point he ordered a pair of custom built passive subs, with 4 NHT 12" drivers in two cabinets (two sealed boxes per cabinet) that stood 7'3" tall and weighed in at around 375 pounds each. We took those drivers and wired them in both parallel and series so that each side represented a 4 Ohm load to the amp. Then we drove each of those subs with 2000 watt class D amplifiers (4000 into 4 ohms, just over 6000 peak into 2 Ohms). They were crossed over at the THX specification of 80Hz with a steep 18dB slope so as not to get into the mains. Then he had Ty build him some mains with dual Eminence 12's, twin 6½'s and a horn loaded 1" dome tweeter. Those darned things would beat the living snot outta' ya'. :rolleyes: Not accurate, neither did they have a deep and wide soundstage, but for movies (especially action movies) they were most impressive. Of course there were custom sides and rears to match that came with the package.

About a year later he called and wanted to get rid of all those speakers EXCEPT the subs. Just got tired of the insane levels of bass, and being literally beat to death by a wall of sound in that room that was devoid of the openness and depth that he'd decided he would rather have. That was when we went to an all RBH setup. One that was VERY expensive because they have passive subs both on the bottom and the top of their largest speakers. Those speakers were well into $37K by the end of the day. And while they had bass drivers on top and bottom, plus 4 mids and 3 tweets each, the accuracy, timbre, depth and openness of the soundstage was magical.

Moved the crossover on the monster passive subs down to 45Hz with only a 12dB slope (bringing in the mains @ 60Hz with an 18dB slope) yet that still pressurized the snot out of the room.... with more low end bass than you could imagine. :D

And yes.... when the dinosaur stomped.... the GLASS OF WATER DID SHAKE! :dblthumb2:
(Along with the whole foundation of the home.)
 
Well, of course... as I mentioned... one can spend stupid amounts of money in car audio. I've had experience with custom tuning individual crossovers for speaker sets. Also have had (still do) several AudioControl components, most similar to their current EQL, EQS, EQX type components. Of course in addition to the Morel drivers I mentioned earlier I've had Altec, JVC, JBL, SEAS, Vifa, Scanspeak and may other drivers.

High end auto installs can (and do) sound quite well. But given the constraints, there just are too many physics going against any installation that you simply don't have when installing into a proper room. Dollar for dollar you can take the same expenditure in a rectangle shaped room and have exponentially better sound. ;)

The inherent problem that will always exist within the confines of an automobile/truck/van etc. is you just do not physically have the space to reproduce a given sound wave. For instance, low bass will never physically be able to be reproduced inside the confines of an automobile due to the wavelengths involved. (IE: 24Hz=28.25ft @ sea level @ 72°) And that is before it hits a wall and needs to reflect back, double that for a full sine wave inside the area. Move down to 20Hz and you need a full 56.5 feet! Then take synthesized/electronic bass from a lot of today's music where they'll mix it down to 14~16Hz and you're looking at a wavelength of 70~80 FEET! :eek:

Agreed 100%. The sound acoustics of any car is a poor environment but personally the ear fatigue from listening to crappy speakers is as unbearable as looking at a new black car with swirls and marring everywhere.
 
Long time Home Theater Audiophile newer to high end and machine detailing. Had my first Dolby prologic set up in 1992 as senior in high school and it has just been escalating ever since. Now I have a dedicated 9.2 channel home theater. The walls ceiling carpet trim work are all either dark grey or black all the paint is flat when a scene goes dark you cant see your hand infront your face. If I had to guess what I have in equipment probably 30k-40k but it's been spread out purchases over 15 years. Best upgrade was going from 73" rear projection to a 110" front projection screen set up just adds such a wow factor (now i want try 130"-150" screen). Love watching Blueray movies and NFL football in the room every thing else disappears and you just get lost in it. I don't think this detailing hobby will cost me near as much only about 1200$ so far. I never got in to car audio I usually listen to sports talk radio when I am in the car.
 
Long time Home Theater Audiophile newer to high end and machine detailing. Had my first Dolby prologic set up in 1992 as senior in high school and it has just been escalating ever since. Now I have a dedicated 9.2 channel home theater. The walls ceiling carpet trim work are all either dark grey or black all the paint is flat when a scene goes dark you cant see your hand infront your face. If I had to guess what I have in equipment probably 30k-40k but it's been spread out purchases over 15 years. Best upgrade was going from 73" rear projection to a 110" front projection screen set up just adds such a wow factor (now i want try 130"-150" screen). Love watching Blueray movies and NFL football in the room every thing else disappears and you just get lost in it. I don't think this detailing hobby will cost me near as much only about 1200$ so far. I never got in to car audio I usually listen to sports talk radio when I am in the car.

What 73" did you have? Newer DLP, or older (and MUCH BETTER) CRT tech? FWIW my main viewing set is a Mitsubishi WS-73615 which was their flagship from 2004~2005/06. Still a better set than any DLP technology, and honestly... in 1080i it's a better picture than most LED sets out there.

Our problem is, (in the main room upstairs) light control. (Like that's something new.) :rolleyes: Even so, I've threatened to mount a projector inside the kitchen cabinet (behind an optical glass pass-thru in the rear wall) and put a 120" screen in the family room. ;) As you can imagine.... that doesn't go over too well (no matter how many times I try). :laughing:

In the interim, the ol' Mits keeps on ticking. Weekend days it'll run 16~18 hours! I'd like to see a new set run 50,000 hours like the old CRT's did! :rolleyes:
 
Which one would you guys go with Alpine type R or a Pioneer Champion? I do have an Alpine stereo though so could keep it in the family.

Alpine
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvOJGL37t6U]Single alpine type r 12" ripping car apart - YouTube[/video]

Pioneer Champion

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIzKqMgKVOo]12" Pioneer Champion Series Pro - YouTube[/video]

The type r is going to sound a lot better than the pioneer. I have a ten inch type r and I love. Best sub I have owned.


Sent from my LG-D850 using AG Online
 
Back
Top