When watching "high end" detailing videos....

W

WRAPT C5Z06

New member
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Messages
12,615
Reaction score
0
I NEVER see a Flex 3401 being used; always a Rupes. Interesting. I just ordered a Rupes MK II 15, so I will have both.
 
WRAPT C5Z06 said:
I NEVER see a Flex 3401 being used; always a Rupes. Interesting. I just ordered a Rupes MK II 15, so I will have both.
Click to expand...

Because the Rupes MKII's:

finish better,
correct better,
are smoother,
quieter,
run cooler,
more comfortable,

And are seen as the more precision, scalpel like, passionate, finesse, making art, premium, professional tool. Its only when you own all the tools you realise how far Rupes have shifted the goal posts with the MKII's it makes everything else seem caveman and outdated in comparison. My Ferrari,Range Rover, Porsche customer themselves insist nothing touch their paint apart from Rupes, this just goes to show the justified perception the brand has carved out.
 
Zubair said:
Because the Rupes MKII's:

finish better,
correct better,
are smoother,
quieter,
run cooler,
more comfortable,

And are seen as the more precision, scalpel like, passionate, finesse, making art, premium, professional tool. Its only when you own all the tools you realise how far Rupes have shifted the goal posts with the MKII's it makes everything else seem caveman and outdated in comparison. My Ferrari,Range Rover, Porsche customer themselves insist nothing touch their paint apart from Rupes, this just goes to show the justified perception the brand has carved out.
Click to expand...
I think your points are solid.

Some refer to the 3401 as a BEAST. While it might be, the times I've used a MF pad on a long throw polisher, it will out cut any pad used on the 3401. Of course, good technique is needed, too.
 
Renny Doyle still uses a Flex I believe. Detail Boss in Arizona does high end work and uses a 3401.
Mike P does high end work and uses 3401.

But majority by far is large throw.
 
WRAPT C5Z06 said:
I think your points are solid.

Some refer to the 3401 as a BEAST. While it might be, the times I've used a MF pad on a long throw polisher, it will out cut any pad used on the 3401. Of course, good technique is needed, too.
Click to expand...

It was a Beast back in the day when only a PC was the other alternative as far as DA's are concerned. The Flex still has a place as it has almost indestructible build quality and is very entertaining to use. But after a panel you realise its carburetor technology while the rest of the world has moved to direct injection multivalve turbo.
 
Zubair said:
It was a Beast back in the day when only a PC was the other alternative as far as DA's are concerned. The Flex still has a place as it has almost indestructible build quality and is very entertaining to use. But after a panel you realise its carburetor technology while the rest of the world has moved to direct injection multivalve turbo.
Click to expand...
Good stuff. :xyxthumbs:
 
WRAPT C5Z06 said:
I think your points are solid.

Some refer to the 3401 as a BEAST.
Click to expand...

I'm the guy that coined that nickname. It started when I needed way to sign my FLEX how-to book.

I sign all my books differently. Wouldn't make sense to sign them all the same.

I have way of signing my boat book, which shows both the FLEX 3401 and the RUPES tools. And I have a way of signing my RUPES book.

I also signed my first book "The Art of Detailing" differently than I sign the second version "The Complete Guide to a Show Car Shine".

That's the part of where the nickname the BEAST came from. The other part is unlike free spinning orbital polishers, with a FLEX 3401 you can POWER through a detail faster than free spinning tools because the pad simply will not stop rotating or oscillating, that's two things by the way.

Fee spinning tools all work great on flat panels, but have a tendency to stall or lose pad rotation when you get into curves or close to edges. That's just the nature of the beast... or better said, the nature of free spinning tools.

The benefits Zubair listed are the trade off for zero stalling of pad rotating and pad oscillation.

Different strokes for different folks. (no pun intended)


:)



WRAPT C5Z06 said:
While it might be, the times I've used a MF pad on a long throw polisher, it will out cut any pad used on the 3401. Of course, good technique is needed, too.
Click to expand...

You mean out cut any pad used on the FLEX 3401 on a flat surface or ALL surfaces?


:dblthumb2:
 
Exactly,different strokes for different folks as Mike mentioned. I like having all the tools as it takes away from the monotony when you detail daily. What gets to me is Flex's masterpiece the PE-14 doesn't get much mention or credit around here. That is one ridiculously underrated polisher that needs more credit. I can't find good enough words to praise the PE-14 its really that good! Its the machine once you use it you will only then realise how did you ever live without it.

If you doing this professionally a PE-14 and a Rupes MKII is the best detailing combo on the planet currently, both made my life so much easier and have paid for themselves in speed of correction and smoothness.
 
Just for the recored...

Since Mark brought up the nickname of the FLEX 3401, here's how I sign each book....


300_1_book.jpg


Make it shine!




300_2_book.jpg


Keep on shining!




300_3_book.jpg


The FLEX 3401 is a BEAST

Master the Beast!




300_4_book.jpg


RUPES

The Ferrari of polishers!



300_5_book.jpg


Stay on the dry side and have fun on the water!



Everyone has an opinion on how to use these tools or detail cars and boats.... try writing your opinion down in a book and then put it out there on the market for world review sometime...


:laughing:
 
There are very few people, if any is more my thinking, that would be able to detect any difference in finish between the Flex (forced rotation), or any high end or popular DA. Fact is 99.9% of my customers could care less what products or equipment I am using. They just want their cars to look shiny and be protected from the elements.

Buy what you like. I came from DA's and now have a 3401. I would NEVER go back to a DA. I don't have time for stalling. Especially with Nanoskin pads...
 
Zubair said:
What gets to me is Flex's masterpiece the PE-14 doesn't get much mention or credit around here. That is one ridiculously underrated polisher that needs more credit.
Click to expand...

I disagree, Mike Phillips has heaped tons of praise on the PE-14.
 
Zubair said:
What gets to me is Flex's masterpiece the PE-14 doesn't get much mention or credit around here. That is one ridiculously underrated polisher that needs more credit. I can't find good enough words to praise the PE-14 its really that good!

Its the machine once you use it you will only then realize how did you ever live without it.
Click to expand...

Sounds like something I wrote...

The Flex PE14 Rotary Polisher - The rotary I grab first...



Zubair said:
If you doing this professionally a PE-14 and a Rupes MKII is the best detailing combo on the planet currently, both made my life so much easier and have paid for themselves in speed of correction and smoothness.
Click to expand...


I'd agree that if I could only choose 2 tools, then I would choose a rotary buffer, the FLEX PE14 and a dual action polisher.

If I were locked into just 2 tools then I would have to make the orbital polisher the Griot's Garage 6" DA because I not only use a DA for polishing paint but also for machine scrubbing and machine wet sanding.

In fact right now out in the garage I doing compounding and wet sanding testing and using the Griot's 6" DA to machine sand with and the FLEX PE14 to cut out my sanding marks.


But for the average person, that doesn't ever machine sand, they could choose a long orbit stroke polisher or any of the others to go with their rotary buffer of choice.


:)
 
Mike Phillips said:
You mean out cut any pad used on the FLEX 3401 on a flat surface or ALL surfaces?


:dblthumb2:
Click to expand...
Ha....great question. I'm referring to flat surfaces.

No doubt, the 3401 can power through non-flat surfaces better.
 
I just LOVE to use MF pads! I find them so efficient, but only on a free spinning DA, so that's why I added a long throw to my arsenal. If they worked as good on the 3401, I wouldn't bother with any other tool for correction.
 
WRAPT C5Z06 said:
I NEVER see a Flex 3401 being used;
always a Rupes. Interesting.
Click to expand...
•I've often wondered what the rewards
are for some of those "high-end detailers"...
that are chosen by companies, manufac-
turers, and the like...to, basically, become
their "Brand Influencers"


•IMO:
-It's a whale of a marketing strategy.



Bob
 
FUNX650 said:
•I've often wondered what the rewards
are for some of those "high-end detailers"...
that are chosen by companies, manufac-
turers, and the like...to, basically, become
their "Brand Influencers"


•IMO:
-It's a whale of a marketing strategy.



Bob
Click to expand...
I don't think so. Offline, I've talked with MANY pro detailers who prefer the Rupes 15 & 21 to the 3401.
 
I would say the other reason a lot of pro detailers prefer the Rupes is because it's less of a toll on their bodies compared to the 3401. The 3401 has its purpose but at the same time, long throw means the machine does the work not you. The 3401 is great for powering through defects but the Rupes is much smoother to hold and use.
 
I think part of it is trends, and fashion.

Long throw machines - which work exceptionally well - are the "in" thing right now. End users want to see what they're all about, and professionals are seeing the benefits of using them

The 3401 has been around for years. One can only imagine what's going to become available in the years ahead.

You never know, you might see the 3401 make a resurgence in coming years. It might become the "in" thing like it was when it was first introduced.

A good friend of mine here in Pontiac has one. I'm going to use it the next time I go over there. I actually miss having it around. I had it from 2012 - 2015. It was kind of a staple in my arsenal - even though I work better with a PC or a Duetto...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top